中国汽车首次挺进北美，一辆6550美元

苍蝇拍

In China, the road traffic injury was 5,384,909 in 1998;

In North America, the road traffic injury was 1,670,374.


In China, the population was 1.248 billion in 1998;
http://www.cpirc.org.cn/en/totpope.htm

In North America, the population was 0.394 billion in 1998.
http://env.chass.utoronto.ca/env200.../population.pdf



The crude rate of the road traffic injury in China was 5,384,909 /1.248 billion =0.0043 in 1998.

The crude rate of the road traffic injury in North America was 1,670,374/0.394 billion =0.0042 in 1998.

Is there a big difference in the crude rate of the road traffic injury between China and North America?

No big difference.

山顶洞人

Thanks for your information. However, it is statistics in 1998. We are in 2009 now and do you know how much change can be made in past ten years?

macrophage

有关材料表明：我国交通死亡人数86年为50063人， 87年为53439人， 88年为54814人， 89年为50441人……　而去年，我国有107077人死于交通事故（平均每天293人），占世界的五分之一。

这些年，我国交通事故死亡绝对人数一直是世界第一。对交通事故进行过专门调研的全国政协委员刘全芳在前不久闭幕的两会上说，更重要的是这些数字背后的对比。有数据表明：中国汽车拥有量是世界的1.9%，死亡人数则是世界的20%。同时,中国交通事故致死率也是世界最高的。2004年我国交通致死率为 27.3%，而同期美国为1.3%，日本为0.9%。

你引用的文章，来自某一地方论坛，属个人评论，无论结论还是数据都缺乏足够可信的可论证来源。
Sedona引用的文章数据来自WHO，比你提供的要可信得多。根据此文章提供的数据，中国1998年交通事故死亡人数是17万8千多人。
怎么可能在逐年增长后，去年反而减少到107077人？

另根据Sedona引用的文章数据，至少在1998年，中国的交通事故致死率不可能与美洲、欧洲、日本相差那么悬殊，更不可能比印度的高。

苍蝇拍

...............

同时,中国交通事故致死率也是世界最高的。2004年我国交通致死率为 27.3%，而同期美国为1.3%，日本为0.9%。


同是交通事故，为什么我国的致死率会如此之高？除了人所共知的一些因素之外，我国的混合交通，即二轮摩托车、大型客车、汽车、自行车和行人在同一路面上混行是重要原因之一。由此导致我国的交通死亡原因和伤害模式与高收入国家极不相同。换句话说，国外的交通事故大多是车撞车，而我国很多是车撞人。发达国家死于交通事故的大多是车内的乘客，而我国更多的是行人、骑自行车或骑摩托车者。

283y

你引用的文章，来自某一地方论坛，输个人评论，无论结论还是数据都缺乏足够可信的论证来源。
Sedona引用的文章数据来自WHO，比你提供的要可信得多。根据此文章提供的数据，中国1998年交通事故死亡人数是17万8千多人。
怎么可能在逐年增长后，去年反而减少到107077人？


how about this?

公安部统计显示中国车祸死亡率全球最高
http://xk.cn.yahoo.com/articles/080521/1/a7ab.html

the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.

macrophage

the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.

这个和上面那个一样啊。
某论坛的个人评论，根本没有可信的可供论证的数据来源。

确实，the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.

However, 178,894 is the number of lives lost   in the road traffic fatalities, not the number of the road traffic fatalities .

苍蝇拍

the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.


In the absence of adequate public funding and an effective administration department under the Chinese government, the development of road traffic injury surveillance and information systems has been too slow to meet present requirements of MVC control and prevention efforts in China.  In addition, it has made comparisons difficult when doing MVC research in China (15).  For example, at present, much of the developed world defines the mortality of a road traffic collision according to the number of deaths occurring up to 30 days after injury (43).  China, however, defines it according to the number of deaths occurring within 7 days after injury, and the number of death wasn’t taken into account for a road traffic collision’s data while the MVC occurred on the railroad in China (20).  In addition, there are still eight kinds of road traffic collisions that aren’t incorporated into national statistics in China.  For instance, MVCs occurring on private roads constructed by factories, mines and farms’ owners, on cluster paths between houses or buildings, on sections of road still being constructed, and at rail crossings have not been included into traffic collision statistics.  Thus, there are frequent discrepancies between data from groups such as police and from health-related sources due to different standards of data collection.  As well, underreporting of road traffic injuries also limits the validity of some existing data sources.  There is no doubt that this kind of situation can explain why there were different statistical results reported by China and the WHO in 2002.

[U]According to a 2004 WHO report, the number of MVC mortality was 250,007 in 2002 .

The number of MVC deaths reported by the Chinese government was only 107,000 in 2002.[/U]

欲晓

我想在加拿大买中国汽车等了很多年了，希望早日实现我的夙愿。

me too!

283y

in the road traffic fatalities, not the road traffic fatality .


it's not 个人评论, it's from yahoo news, the title claims "公安部统计". here is another one from xinhuanet.
http://www.qh.xinhuanet.com/traf ... content_9810834.htm
just do a search on yahoo or baidu,it's everywhere.

苍蝇拍

macrophage

just do a search on yahoo or baidu,it's everywhere.

可我觉得还是个人评论啊。
那个记者虽然说是"公安部统计"，但我却无法验证他说得准不准。
很多网站引用他的说法，但他的数据如何而来，中国的交通事故死亡率是多少，美国的交通事故死亡率是多少，印度的交通事故死亡率是多少，他都没给出，一句"据公安部统计"就完了。
而且，根据他的数据2006年是8万9千人死于交通意外，和你前面引用的文章以及WHO 的报告的数据相比，是在减少，而不是增加。

justpaste

可我觉得还是个人评论啊。
那个记者虽然说是"公安部统计"，但我却无法验证他说得准不准。
很多网站引用他的说法，但他的数据如何而来，中国的交通事故死亡率是多少，美国的交通事故死亡率是多少，印度的交通事故死亡率是多少，他都没给出，一句"据公安部统计"就完了。
而且，根据他的数据2006年是8万9千人死于交通意外，和你前面引用的文章以及WHO 的报告的数据相比，是在减少，而不是增加。


This whole argument is invalid. You can not get real data in China.

单枪匹马

国内交通事故大多是进口车干的，与国产车质量无关

山顶洞人

国内交通事故大多是进口车干的，与国产车质量无关


不是没可能。

pick3

红旗车看起来很不错。

但愿只要$6550美元