就算是宣传,也要有得可宣传,我愿意抛砖引玉,寻求新华社体外一种更好改变华人形象的外交新思维,干嘛不问问网友都什么意见呢?再有,个人攻击和幽人一默是有明显的区别的,而幽默是如何能在外交场合化干戈为玉帛并赢得更多尊重的道理不用赘述吧?其实问题的关键在于:周总理之后,有外交智慧、或者有伯乐胸襟的将才少之又少。 重贴我的回答:我要是王毅,我就要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
装开明办一言堂的气量就不要拉虎皮、扛大旗, ok? 扣帽子也是一贯的伎俩,so what?!
还贴律政混混的回答:我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" 至于陈先生,在这个人云亦云的浮华时代,为功利可以乔装打扮的时代,我对他表示尊敬: Salute, Mr. Chen! -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
外交部的修养作为,某些人是真诚还是伪善,老百姓心中自有一把尺,这件事就是一个很好的证明。 我不跟帖了,你们自嗨吧!
律政混混的回答:王毅遭遇到的是暗埋偏见假设的提问,必须介入反驳。我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" 至于陈先生,在这个人云亦云的浮华时代,为功利可以乔装打扮的时代,我对他表示尊敬: Salute, Mr. Chen! -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!不依附于任何权贵的中国臭老九一名。吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!