|
回复:回复:回复:回复:我没看出来Sedona错在哪里
最初由[冬雪canada]发布
回复:回复:回复:我没看出来Sedona错在哪里
看来你是纸上军事家,不了解情况乱放炮。
我在拘押期间没有人能与我说话,(我不懂英语)我怎么知道审理什么案子。
第二次上法庭不是因为我违法不接触令,是Amnda吴告我威胁她,我说了多少次,你总是错误的混绕,你也不想一想,在平权会没有发影片首映式之前,有谁看到我说过我家的事,是平权会已经伤害了孩子的隐私权,我才站出来揭露的
另外讲述事实还因为是有一位自称是老袁的知情人编造事实欺骗别人,我才被动的说明事实,这事情总有一个先后顺序吧。
打官司,我也是无奈之举,不得不走的一步,我早就声明不想与媒体过不去,是平权会的做法让为别无选择。
1. I did not see you understood English in your first court issue, but you knew why you were in the court. In the second court issue, you declared you did not know why you were in teh court since you did not understand English.
Does it make sense to anybody?
2. I did not see too many people on your side, the more you disclosed, the worse your situation would be.
3. I bet you are not able to get custody, probably only access after the restraining order is expired. However, you will probably start with supervised access some time later. Considering what you are doing online, I don't believe you are a great father, sensible, sensitive, or responsible. The more you are arguing, the more hurts you put on your daughter. This is a common sense for any parent. It seems to me revenge is more significant than your responsibility of parenting, in your eyes.
4. Restraining order is a restraining order which does tell us something, though not everything.
5. Everyone posting threads here is trying to clarify their understandings probably based on their common sense, logical thinking, life experiences, emotional preferences, work experiences, professional knowledge, and so on. There is not right or wrong in terms of each one's opinions, we are trying to clarify some ideas and Justice systems in Canada. IF you refuse to take any idea, nor to think about any one of them, it is your problem; however, the readers will have an idea and form their own judegement. |
|