• 实时天气:多伦多 28°
    温度感觉: 27°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 21°
    温度感觉: 23°
  • 实时天气:卡加利 28°
    温度感觉: 26°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 24°
    温度感觉: 28°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 24°
    温度感觉: 24°
楼主: 加拿大老张
打印 上一主题 下一主题

调查显示:90%受访者反对Bill 13法案

 
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-16 09:44:17 | 只看该作者
社会应该允许同性恋人士的存在, 但绝不意味着同性恋人士可以通过某些政党立法强迫非同性恋人士必须学习同性恋课程, 这是欧洲黑暗中世纪教庭宗教审判所的做法.
回复

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2012-5-16 09:50:06 | 只看该作者
已经电邮 [email protected] [Subject Line: No Bill 13]
回复

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 2012-5-16 09:50:47 | 只看该作者
自由党下课!!
自由党下课!!
自由党下课!!
回复

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:12:25 | 只看该作者
回复 12# Kohan

强迫正常的孩子在完全不懂性事前洗脑灌输病态的伦理,不是文明,是堕落,是犯罪。可以同情,不歧视他们,但不能误导孩子有背天之伦理。
回复

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:23:17 | 只看该作者
Please send the following letter to your MPP.
You can look up your MPPs contact information here: http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/members/members_current.do?locale=en

It has come to my attention that Bill 13 – Accepting Schools Act is awaiting a vote after second reading in the legislature.

As a constituent in your riding, I wish to express my sincere concern to you about this bill, and request that you vote against it or to be absent for the vote. My concerns are as follows:

· Although the effort to combat bullying and inequality in schools is appreciated, there seems to be a strong bias in Bill 13 toward the promotion of LGBTTIQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, transsexual, two-spirited, intersexed, queer and questioning) lifestyles over other groups. The preamble of Bill 13 does not explicitly discuss promoting equity for heterosexuals, men, or women, nor does it make reference to protecting against bullying based on religious beliefs, political affiliation or any general association. Why should the government explicitly promote one group above another or to the exclusion of other groups?

· Bill 13 appears to enforce and enshrine fairly new policies and procedures at the school board level across Ontario , which seem to restrict or remove parental rights, the freedom of speech, religion, conscience and association, especially around gender and sexual education in the public education system. Tolerance is the respectful interaction of diverse viewpoints, and moving beyond it to broad-based acceptance will constrict both freedom and equality in schools.

· Pierre Trudeau stated that, “there’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation.” Why then is the state using the public education system, even the farthest arm of the state – the Kindergarten teachers, to metaphorically “go into the bedrooms of the children” and teach and legitimize a variety of gender orientations (some of which are sexual in nature). This is evident in the surveys that will take place to see where students are at and to change the teaching to modify the worldviews to legitimize the LGBTQ lifestyles. These surveys are given now in the Toronto District School Board from K-12.

· Bill 13, at a few points, defines bullying in a very broad subjective manner that leaves it open to wide interpretation, with the consequences for such behaviour being student expulsion. Examples of phrases left open to wide interpretation are, (Section 1:1a) “the pupil ought to know that the behaviour would be likely to cause” and “perceived power imbalance” (emphasis added).

· Bill 13 specifically hinders the freedom of speech, religion and association by only allowing groups to rent school space who will conform to the code of conduct within each school board. When a publicly funded Board of Education has a different code of conduct than a public group renting the space, the public group should still be able to meet and freely speak and associate. Each Board of Education should be tolerant and freely permit the variety of beliefs and values held by its public citizens.

· Bill 13 removes freedoms of speech, religion and association by forcing Catholic schools to explicitly promote values, lifestyles and beliefs they do not agree with, which they are entitled to under the Canadian Constitution. It furthermore has the potential to lead to these freedoms being removed from private schools.

· Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, every Canadian citizen has the following fundamental freedoms: the freedom of conscience and religion (Canada Act 1982, 2A), freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication (Canada Act 1982, 2B), and the freedom of association (Canada Act 1982, 2D). Can the government uphold these rights by permitting freedom for a variety of groups to believe what they want and not promote one group above another?

In light of these concerns, I request that you vote against Bill 13 or be absent for the vote so that this Bill does not become legislation. Instead, I would encourage you to support Bill 14 – Anti-Bullying Act, which seeks to protect all students from bullying (not just some groups), and it does not carry the same limitations on the freedom of speech, conscience, association and religion in the public arena.

Yours respectfully,
cz98aa 发表于 2012-5-10 11:14


这个帖子好.
回复

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:27:11 | 只看该作者
性欲和食欲,是人类天经地义的需求,进行理性早期性教育不好吗?我们不是都认同教育要从小做起吗?为什么对如此重要的性教育我们却认为是禁忌?

Bill 13 有助于帮助下一代建立正确的性观念,大多数家长们都认为性是羞耻禁忌(受传统错误观念引导), 以为禁止谈性就能让你们的孩子摆脱将来的性无知而自动取得性知识? 你肚子饿了要吃饭,当你有性需求时,你需要有性释放。

压制和禁止早期理性性教育,等同于压制和禁止食欲。 愚昧而羞羞答答的家长,该清醒了!!!

让我们大大方方地来谈性教育吧!
BL666 发表于 2012-5-16 09:48

热泪支持, 你们夫妻可以在家里当面给孩子做示范. 一定要早啊! 大大方方地啊!
回复

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:30:07 | 只看该作者
选择哪种性交方式,是个人的决定,作为家长,没有权力去决定孩子应该采用哪种性交方式。

至于同性恋,不是学来的,是家长们生出来的,就如你生男或生女,谁都没有过错,大大方方接受你孩子的性倾向吧。 认识和接受人类不同的性倾向非常重要。
BL666 发表于 2012-5-16 10:00

性取向和后期的教育,环境有关. 把你弄到同性恋人群中, 你也会变的, 你懂的.
回复

使用道具 举报

23#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-16 10:34:33 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:46:45 | 只看该作者
选择哪种性交方式,是个人的决定,作为家长,没有权力去决定孩子应该采用哪种性交方式。

至于同性恋,不是学来的,是家长们生出来的,就如你生男或生女,谁都没有过错,大大方方接受你孩子的性倾向吧。 认识和接受人类不同的性倾向非常重要。
BL666 发表于 2012-5-16 10:00

”是家长们生出来的“,你学过生物学和社会心理学吗?

任何社会现象的产生,包括躯体疾病和精神疾病,都由基因和环境造成。你只说其一,不说其二,是科学和客观的态度吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 2012-5-16 10:51:10 | 只看该作者
退一步说,即便是天生基因造成的,为什么一定要强迫大家接受他们的做法. 喜欢乱伦的,兽交的都可以说自己是天生基因造成的.是不是也要大家接受,认同他们的做法?
异性夫妻组成家庭,生儿育女是人类社会繁衍生存的根本, 此乃天意.逆天意而行是会受惩罚的.
weinberger 发表于 2012-5-16 10:33 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif


在这个问题上,你觉得中共是不是做得好些?中国社会在这点上是不是不如西方国家畸形?
回复

使用道具 举报

26#
发表于 2012-5-16 11:53:50 | 只看该作者

调查显示:90%受访者反对Bill 13法案

本帖最后由 弄舟 于 2012-5-16 14:10 编辑
选择哪种性交方式,是个人的决定,作为家长,没有权力去决定孩子应该采用哪种性交方式。

至于同性恋,不是学来的,是家长们生出来的,就如你生男或生女,谁都没有过错,大大方方接受你孩子的性倾向吧。 认识和接受人类不同的性倾向非常重要。
BL666 发表于 2012-5-16 10:00


既然是个人的决定,政府掺和什么?稍稍讲点逻辑好不好?
回复

使用道具 举报

27#
发表于 2012-5-16 11:59:02 | 只看该作者
关于这个问题可以打个比方:一般人们都认为1+1=2,可有些人非得说1+1=3,并且试图给出各种论证1+1可以=3,如今说得人多了,大家也就算了,随便你说吧,结果它们又不干了说必须立法教育下一代1+1可以=2也可以=3。
回复

使用道具 举报

28#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-16 12:07:43 | 只看该作者

调查显示:90%受访者反对Bill 13法案

本帖最后由 加拿大老张 于 2012-5-16 13:17 编辑
既然是个人的决定,政府参和什么?稍稍讲点逻辑好不好?
弄舟 发表于 2012-5-16 12:53


既然搞同性恋或异性恋是个人的决定, 安省政府为什么要立法强迫异性恋的小学生必须学习同性恋课程,家长反对就是违法? 这算什么法案? 难道安省自由党想以政府的名义干涉个人自由?
回复

使用道具 举报

29#
发表于 2012-5-16 12:14:45 | 只看该作者
性欲和食欲,是人类天经地义的需求,进行理性早期性教育不好吗?我们不是都认同教育要从小做起吗?为什么对如此重要的性教育我们却认为是禁忌?

Bill 13 有助于帮助下一代建立正确的性观念,大多数家长们都认为性是羞耻禁忌(受传统错误观念引导), 以为禁止谈性就能让你们的孩子摆脱将来的性无知而自动取得性知识? 你肚子饿了要吃饭,当你有性需求时,你需要有性释放。

压制和禁止早期理性性教育,等同于压制和禁止食欲。 愚昧而羞羞答答的家长,该清醒了!!!

让我们大大方方地来谈性教育吧!
BL666 发表于 2012-5-16 09:48 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif


真是毒害青少年。叫你的孩子去搞GAY吧,有了艾滋病你再去忏悔吧!
回复

使用道具 举报

30#
发表于 2012-5-16 12:16:12 | 只看该作者

调查显示:90%受访者反对Bill 13法案

本帖最后由 东方顺 于 2012-5-16 13:18 编辑
在这个问题上,你觉得中共是不是做得好些?中国社会在这点上是不是不如西方国家畸形?
aaazzz 发表于 2012-5-16 11:51

但是在这个问题上,也有做得不好的。比如,不能叫某某同志(同性恋的别称)。

更不能让胡同志与奥同志干这事::laugh:

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表