|
地板
楼主 |
发表于 2007-4-28 08:49:37
|
只看该作者
最初由[Sedona]发布
Helen's article is quite good. Her analysis explains her position from a legal perspective.
Like Helen, I have been "pure legal" thus far in 51. I always toss out my opinion only based on law and government administration, and almost nothing else.
I have been reading 清新小溪. I think this time she is right:
1. Zhang never did anything harmful to Canada.
2. We know Zhang's case will open a flood gate. Till now, we don't know the impact of such a precedence on Canada. If there are too many of them, Canada can close the door again.
3. Canada in the past has done something similar: after 64 in China, Somali in 90s and Albania in 94.
4. The child has a right to a loving family.
清新小溪 has a heart. Perhaps we can learn from her this time.
你也是个好人,你也有颗心。 (直译的,不好)
法律已经判定张女不能作为难民留下来,这一点我非常清楚。但作为一个还有“心”的人,不能不考虑人道的因素。这里已经超越张女案的范围了,而是在讨论“心”的问题,甚至更远一点。 |
|