奥巴马：克里米亚全民公决违反国际法

爱国侨胞

奥巴马：克里米亚全民公决违反国际法

---

奥巴马总统3月6日在白宫就乌克兰局势发表声明

相关文章

• 奥巴马签署行政命令 抵制促成乌克兰不稳局势个人与实体
• 克里米亚投票入俄 危机加剧

字体大小- +
美国之音

03.06.2014

美国总统奥巴马说，对俄罗斯的新制裁将使俄罗斯为出兵克里米亚付出代价，而且，计划中的有关克里米亚是否加入俄罗斯的全民公决违反国际法与乌克兰宪法。

奥巴马在白宫对记者说，他星期六签署了一项行政令授权制裁，制裁包括对破坏乌克兰领土完整或盗窃乌克兰人民资产的人实行签证限制。

奥巴马说，这些措施是在与欧洲盟国进行紧密协调的情况下采取的。他还说，他很高兴看到在这个关键的时刻表现出的国际团结。

奥巴马总统说，乌克兰克里米亚地区在3月16日就是否成为俄罗斯一部分举行全民公决违反国际法。他说，任何有关乌克兰未来的讨论都必须有乌克兰合法政府的参与。

俄罗斯总统普京称，占领乌克兰克里米亚基础设施和军事基地的是当地公民的自卫组织，而不是俄罗斯军队。美国国务院对此作出回应说，有充分的证据显示，在克里米亚组织严密的反乌克兰武装力量中，俄罗斯安全部队发挥着核心作用。

多羡鱼少结网

在利比亚设禁飞区是根据那条《国际法》？

weinberger

I agree with you. Invading Iraq is the biggest mistake made by the US in modern history. It undermined international law and seriously damaged US reputation and credibility.
But the question is: just because US made this mistake, does it give all other countries the right to invade each other at will? Remember there is a key difference here, the US never intended to keep Irap as its colony permanently and have almost completed a total troop withdrawl from Iraq now. But Russians never intend to leave, once they grab your territory, it will never be given back to you. Don't forget the large chunk of Chinese territories that were taken by Russia, China can never dream to take any of them back.

美国入侵伊拉克的时候，想到过《国际法》了吗？
讨厌汉奸 发表于 2014-3-7 11:44

讨厌汉奸

美国入侵伊拉克的时候，想到过《国际法》了吗？

weinberger

南联盟 was already seperated, and hundreds of thousands people have already been killed by the Serbian before the West intervened.
Yes, you can say above are all lies from the West media, and 南联盟 was a happy, rich country before the West dropped bombs, then there is no need to talk further.

当初南联盟分裂的时候怎么没有人说违反国际法？
漂流的沙 发表于 2014-3-7 11:24

漂流的沙

当初南联盟分裂的时候怎么没有人说违反国际法？
:thinking::thinking::thinking:

打一地名

Every thing that goes wrong in this world can somehow be blamed on the US, no proof needed. Something goes wrong in certain country, wow, that country never had this problem, must be the American did something that caused its trouble, bad American. If the US support people who want democracy in a country, it intervenes in foreign affair, bad American.  If the US does't support them, then it protects dictator in that country, bad American, and on and on.  
Eventually, the US will be shamed by you people into doing nothing outside its border. Then, let's see how our new cop in town - Mother Russia, or maybe China handles countries like Canada, and anybody who dares to criticize them. Must be 1000 times better than the Americans do.

回复  onceninerfan
weinberger 发表于 2014-3-7 00:59

你胡说八道的时候讲究啥证据了？！

加拿大老张

回到几年前，如果克里米亚全民公决加入北约就一定不违反国际法了！
慧眼识妖孽 发表于 2014-3-6 18:06

克里米亚全民公决违反国际法? 这时候奥巴马就不讲民主了. 人家克里米亚选民一人一票决定克里米亚前途, 跟国际法有P关系?!

满 江 红

一点幽默感都没有的人啊。

vvsp

Why you use translation software to ruin what I wrote. Can't you read English?

回复  C罗
weinberger 发表于 2014-3-7 10:20

     这就要问你自己了.

weinberger

Why you use translation software to ruin what I wrote. Can't you read English?

回复 26# C罗

weinberger

Every thing that goes wrong in this world can somehow be blamed on the US, no proof needed. Something goes wrong in certain country, wow, that country never had this problem, must be the American did something that caused its trouble, bad American. If the US support people who want democracy in a country, it intervenes in foreign affair, bad American.  If the US does't support them, then it protects dictator in that country, bad American, and on and on.  
Eventually, the US will be shamed by you people into doing nothing outside its border. Then, let's see how our new cop in town - Mother Russia, or maybe China handles countries like Canada, and anybody who dares to criticize them. Must be 1000 times better than the Americans do.

回复 24# onceninerfan

onceninerfan

......如果他们有力量把中国军队赶走，用自己的军队控制新疆，建立有效的政府，得到国际的承认，就是另一回事。但是这样做，第一没有军事实力上的可能，第二对他们自己的民族利益并没有好处，因为这样的内陆“国家”很难和外界联系，发展受到极大限制，不如作为中国的一部分.....酒中仙 发表于 2014-3-6 19:48

像美国这样的国际政治流氓讲什么“国际法”，这已经不再是可笑的事。
fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
只要符合美国和西方利益，没有军队，美国为首的西方可以鼓动带路党打头阵，拼凑雇佣军捣乱；就是搞不成大事，也可以造成足够动乱，伤及无辜百姓，然后再站出来装出济世安邦的伪善面目，把自己造的孽推到所在国的政府身上，通过宣传工具把该国的政府丑化成“独裁”、屠戮自己百姓的恶棍，而其实美国为首的西方手上沾满鲜血却栽赃他人。
请问前南斯拉夫是怎么解体的？利比亚、叙利亚和今天的乌克兰都是怎么回事？既然奥巴马讲克里米亚的前途不能绕开乌克兰政府，为什么美国和西方在这些国家的所作所为却反其道而行之？为什么乌克兰的前“民选政府”可以“绕开”，现在的所谓“代理内阁”却不能“绕开”？

多羡鱼少结网

如果中央政府不同意，你自己的公投没有法律效力，只能叫民意测验。
酒中仙 发表于 2014-3-6 19:34

啥中央政府，啥法律效力，笑S人。

民选的政府理应按法律效力存在，可是说推翻就随便推翻，连个弹劾程序都不走一下，这个世界还有什么公理和正义可言？

进击的猪头

反正接下来就看老美和老毛子的角力了，欧盟天朝神马的最多就是各自充当啦啦队，欧盟离得近，美国要派兵还能跟着凑点观光团出来，而天朝基本上围着看看热闹就行了