酒糟之歌
幡帖要常顶，呵呵，让又是卖成功学，又是谈话的缸现现原形。
念来过倒就猪是 发表于 2015-3-6 12:24
幡帖要常顶，呵呵，让又是卖成功学，又是谈话的缸现现原形。
:victory:
美国人说：美国在伊拉克的战争所带来的几十万人的死亡，社会动荡，是ISIS兴起的原因。
酒糟啊，你美国爹刚拉了一坨。你快来舔干净。
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/why-isis-exists/ar-AA9taNR?ocid=LENDHP
In the U.S. war on Iraq, hundreds of thousands died the sort of deaths that, if broadcast in an ISIS video, would have inflamed international opinion.
The Middle East is suffering the blowback from rotten U.S. policies, disastrous wars, and cultural turmoil. ISIS and its ilk are one result.
ISIS -- or the so-called "Islamic State" -- is the latest and most horrifying iteration of the modern terror groups that have plagued the region in recent years. With 20,000 to 30,000 combatants and recruits streaming in from all over the globe, the group is unlikely to be significantly degraded by U.S. air strikes -- not when political conditions in the Middle East continue to favor it.
The media often depicts ISIS recruits as lost souls in search of a cause or suffering from mental illness. That may be true in some cases. But these explanations are not sufficient to explain ISIS's resilience and recruitment capabilities.
No organization, especially a terrorist one, can survive without support. That can range from passive acceptance to active assistance, and it comes from individuals who may view ISIS as either the lesser of many evils or else a righteous group waging a holy war.
Both views are fueled not only by decades of Western colonialism, but also by recent U.S. invasions, drone strikes, and the installation and support of corrupt and brutal puppet governments. When Washington holds hands with dictators, or strikes oil deals that benefit only the hyper-wealthy, hatreds are remembered and passed down over the generations.
Yes, ISIS has committed unspeakable atrocities. But it's too easy to forget that the U.S. invasion of Iraq killed some half a million Iraqis by one estimate -- most of them civilians -- and wounded another million. Looking at the numbers, we can only imagine the thousands of Iraqi children killed by bombs who may have actually been burned alive or smashed by rubble. They died the sort of deaths that inflame Arabs and Muslims around the world. No mother, father, sister, or brother will ever forget.
The invasion also brought torture and sexual abuse of Iraqi prisoners, in blatant violation of international law and the most rudimentary elements of humanity. And the pictures of torture we saw are only a small part of what happened.
The aftermath of the war only fueled the outrage felt by Iraqis and the rest of the Muslim and Arab world. The puppet government installed by Washington made corruption a reality at every level of daily life, and it badly neglected and abused the country's non-Shiite populations. Daily life continued to be miserable, if not fatal.
As a nation, the United States likes to tout its moral superiority. Yet the bleak contrast between what Iraqis experienced and America's self-proclaimed exceptionalism led many Iraqis to join a group that made its own set of promises -- ISIS -- and the results have been terrifying.
Meanwhile, America's allies in the Middle East aren't much better.
Saudi Arabia beheads over 100 people per year, and its fellow Gulf States defy any semblance of respect for basic human rights. Even Jordan's King Hussein, touted as a hero for his newfound resolve to fight ISIS, oversees a government that has no freedom of the press and freely tortures dissidents. America's support for these countries motivates a large number of disillusioned locals to join groups like ISIS that promise a different world order under the banner of religion.
Beyond the basic elements that pull supporters into their orbit, ISIS has shown considerable political savvy in advancing its aspirations. It brilliantly made an alliance with the secular Iraqi Baathists (including former soldiers, civil servants, and ordinary civilians) that were thrown out of their jobs in the early stages of the U.S. invasion. These Baathists provide ready-made organizational skills, military prowess, and knowledge of the Arab world.
There is no sound-bite solution to the Middle East. The issues are too complex, with far too many moving parts. President Obama's remarks at the closing session of a recent summit against extremism hinted at the reality of the situation: "If we're going to prevent people from being susceptible to the false promises of extremism," he said, "then the international community has to offer something better." But bombing Iraq and Syria will not solve the problem of ISIS. Neither will putting tens of thousands of American boots on the ground. On the contrary, these actions could potentially add fuel to the fire.
Working with Muslim communities in Western nations to identify issues that could lead some disillusioned members to join terrorist groups would be a worthwhile start. But what are we going to do with the simmering resentment in the Middle East over colonialism, invasions, bombing, and torture?
This anger isn't going away anytime soon. But unless we begin an honest effort to address it, ISIS -- and movements we cannot yet foresee -- will continue to use these issues as ammunition. Sadly, the hostile political environment in Washington doesn't give the president much space to honestly discuss these issues without being labeled as anti-American or some other nonsense.
The muscular arms of ISIS are pulling thousands into its fold and the results are horrific. We need to acknowledge that this nihilistic movement has appeal for a reason and begin to address these issues before the blowback blows us farther than we could imagine.
_________________Adil E. Shamoo is an associate fellow of the Institute for Policy Studies, a senior analyst for Foreign Policy in Focus, and the author of Equal Worth - When Humanity Will Have Peace. He can be reached at [email protected]. Bonnie Bricker is a freelance writer and a contributor to Foreign Policy in Focus.
自己拉滴屎，敢来理论“谈话”一次么？
念来过倒就猪是 发表于 2015-3-10 22:44
自己拉滴屎，敢来理论“谈话”一次么？
转贴机器，自己都没搞清伊拉克在何方位。:lol
把缸滴帖顶在一起集中展览
Orientspear 发表于 2015-3-11 08:16
转贴机器，自己都没搞清伊拉克在何方位。
:lol;P:victory:
酒糟显然把伊拉克，当成其极端崇拜的民主公厕大国印度的邻居了
:thumbup:
C罗 发表于 2015-3-4 12:47
酒糟之歌
站住！西罗，酒糟不值得你如此兴奋、恭维，
没完没了的，你烦不烦那？？？
干点正经事去，去投票：:mad:
http://bbs.51.ca/thread-624588-1-1.html
纸纱窗. 发表于 2015-3-12 21:33
站住！西罗，酒糟不值得你如此兴奋、恭维，
没完没了的，你烦不烦那？？？
酒糟当然不值得大家如此兴奋， 但酒中仙自我糟践，自我虐待， 免费谁不看呐，能不兴奋吗。
成，既然小窗姐发话，哪有不听的， 投票去喽
台湾“发愣大法学会”一地鸡毛的换届
2014年11月23日，台湾发愣功举行“法轮大法学会”换届会议，决定“学院派”骨干张锦华出任新一届理事长。此次貌似风平浪静的人事换届，不会是台湾发愣功“学院派”和“练功派”之间矛盾的结束，实在是二者之间新一轮勾心斗角的开始，本次换届幕后隐情早就为此埋下了深深的伏笔。
一、“练功派”不甘败于“学院派”裙下。此次换届，深层原因是“土城基地”事件爆发后，以洪吉弘为代表的“练功派”与以张清溪为代表的“学院派”矛盾进一步加剧，李洪志不得不派出心腹杨森赴台协调，意欲通过换届中和矛盾。换届结果是“发愣大法学会”理事长从同为“学院派”骨干的张清溪手中交到张锦华掌上。此种结果“练功派”焉能服膺？“练功派”骨干洪月秀更是愤愤不平，私下放风换届是换汤不换药，“练功派”绝不妥协，正在为“练功派”代表人物洪吉弘东山再起厉兵秣马。
二、“练功派”与“学院派”宿怨根深蒂固。早在“学院派”代表人物张清溪担任前“发愣大法学会”负责人期间，其利用理事长的地位、名望和便利，采用各种手段排斥异己，通过不断集权整合，将“练功派”骨干挤出台湾发愣功组织高层，其中洪吉弘甚至落败远走美国他乡。自此，以张清溪为代表的“学院派”与洪吉弘、洪月秀、聂淑文等“练功派”元老始终在思想、行动、利益等方面矛盾不断扩大。
三、“练功派”与“学院派”斗争日趋白热化。“练功派”骨干洪月秀认为台湾发愣功组织由其兄洪吉弘发展壮大，但“学院派”张清溪却独自把持台湾发愣功、瓜分组织利益，心理极不平衡，于是想方设法组织与张清溪对抗。一是怂恿分化。2013年洪月秀与具有“学院派”背景的黄春梅接触时，称洪吉弘曾向李哄猪荐言，黄春梅是台湾发愣功组织负责人合适人选。黄虽心有所动，但不敢造次，表示如果此事是李哄猪的意见，则请求李哄猪亲自出函发布。二是公布丑闻。洪月秀等认为朱婉琪有取代张清溪的潜质，希望与其合作，遭朱婉拒后，遂散布朱婉其与张清溪的情人关系。三是经济发难。洪月秀等多次在发愣功内部高层会议上，要求张清溪公布台湾政党捐资账目明细，意欲以经济问题发难。
四、“学院派”内部貌合神离矛盾必将日益凸显。虽然此次换届“学院派”战胜了“元老派”，但“学院派”内部已是星火点点。一是张清溪下台实非个人本意。虽然发愣功台湾“分舵”新任掌门张锦华是张清溪推荐的，但并非是真心实意的力荐，实在是张清溪委曲求全，顺应李洪志调和两派斗争不得已而为之的结果。二是“学院派”面临一山二虎困局。洪月秀等早就看出并私下放风，张锦华现在是台湾“发愣大法学会” 名义上理事长，实际仍是张清溪在幕后指挥。但张锦华能够胜出，足可见其绝不是一盏省油的灯，怎肯长期甘居人后？看来“二虎一山”局势必将让“学院派”一方面要与“练功派”继续斗争，另一方面还要下好内部倾轧这盘棋。
以上种种显示：此次台湾“发愣大法学会”的换届，“元老派”和“学院派”虽然好歹都暂时鸣了金收了兵，但一地鸡毛的幕后隐情预示着台湾发愣功组织高层新一轮更龌龊更露骨的相互倾轧正悄悄开始。
千古帖乍能沉呢
伊拉克是一面镜子，能找出酒糟的黑心狗吠证据。
今日伊拉克，傻大木入土后都不得安宁，坟墓都被炸毁了。