Weizhen Tang 17 Silk Court Richmond Hill , ON L4B 4A4 March 18, 2018 Counsel Department of Justice Canada Criminal Conviction Review Group
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada K1A 0H8 Dear Mr./Ms. Green, the counsel I am very glad to receive yourletter dated March 9, 2018. I applied for wrongful conviction review andsupported with one big box of documents long time ago by UPS, a registeredmail. I did not get response from you forlong time and I do not know if there are any reasons for it, I am verysurprised that you did reply to me now. In your letter, you indicated that Idid not provide you with my entire trial transcript. The reason I did notprovide you with entire transcript is that I do not have the entire transcript,I only have those important transcript that the Ontario appeal court judgeordered the crown attorney office and the issues related tomy wrongful criminal conviction. You can ask the crown office in Toronto for the entire transcript because they disable me to have the ability andresource to produce all the transcript, I could not afford to produce theentire transcript. I am seeking Justice fromCourt of Ontario, Superior Court of Justice, Court of Appeal for Ontario andSupreme Court of Canada, in Canada, there is no justice in Canada, onlyinterest and business of justice industry. One judge made a wrongfulpremeditated decision, every judge must have to follow the original decisionsand keep going and going until it could hit the wall and exposed, they used so-called rules and statutes to abuse the judicial process tomake process last as long as it could and exhaust my energy and destroymy defense and force me to quit seeking justice. Since I did not have a lawyer orcounsel work for me and do not understand their corporate statutes, rules, andregulations, the judges never listen to me and my defense was useless andineffective in all kind of courts and tribunals. If you see the entire court processand court documents and transcripts, it is waste resources and exhaust and harmand you will see how much the crown attorney office spent and wasted taxpayers’money and resources. It was a nightmare for me, for my family, for my investorsand for taxpayers in order to benefit the justice industry and law firms, I wish you could stop all thesehappened to the people of Ontario and people of Canada. Especially the superiorcourt of justice, the commercial court destroy many business and businesspeople and make them unrepresented and defendless, it is miscarriage of justicefor their own economic business and industry. My case is very simple in terms offraud, all you need to know is where is the money come and go. All my financialtransactions and trade were in the banks and brokerage firms, all the money istracked and transparent and every penny is counted. In terms of my wrongful conviction,Everything I did is in the highly regulated legal financial industry, all mytransaction and trades are transparent and on the record those are government promotes businesses, nothing illegal. I registered and intended to fullyregistered with OSC and work with the government, I made great effort tocompliance with regulation and government, OSC should set me as a good example,but targeted me instead and racially profiled me and maliciously prosecuted mebecause I am a Chinese and do not know the criminal law, they took advantage ofme. They maliciously froze all mytrading accounts, gave all our money to their friends and former colleagues inOSC, ceased all my legitimate, legal trades and business so we do not haveincome and business, power which make people believe that I am not abusinessman, but a fraudster and made me have no money to retain counsel anddefendless. Isolation is an effective weapon for law enforcementofficers, they also isolated me from my partners and my investors and contactswho have interest and trust in me so I could not get help from my friends. OSC and the crown violated me and myCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section seven and took everything awayfrom me since beginning, intent to harm us even before a dueprocess and forced me and my company unrepresented and self-represented. I neverwant my company unrepresented and myself self-represented as you can see fromthe transcripts in June, 29, July 12, August 15 and Sept, 23, 2011 beforeJustice Nordheimer. My wrongful conviction isintentional by the law enforcement officers because I was a high profileprominent Chinese community leader. I believe that lawyers and judges donot want see people like Chinese united and have effective leader andleadership, they are scared of community have good leaders, especially Chinesecommunity leaders to rule, they are even more scared that I came frommainland China and have good relationship with Chinese government and Iwork for investors, for the Oversea Chinese people and protect theChinese new immigrants, the court does not like me and try every ways and meansto destroy me and my power. If you read the trial transcript,you will find that nothing I did wrong and I win the trial and the trial judgekilled my case in his jury charge, you will have enough evidence to convict thecounsels from OSC, commissioners of OSC, many jurists and crown attorney andjudges from appeal court for Ontario, nobody wanted to give me a lawyer incourt. If I do not have lawyer, they do nothave to listen. Everything I said they would always say no merit. Once I couldhave a lawyer, the pro bono duty counsel, Michael Lacy, appointed by thecourt of appeal, he found three major merits, . It is respectfully submittedthat the Applicant’s appeal against conviction and sentence is notfrivolous. Although the appeal will be a difficult one for the Applicant,the following grounds of appeal have some merit1: (a) Nordheimer J. erred in refusing to appointcounsel for the Applicant pursuant to his R. v. Rowbotham application; (b) Theevidence of the Crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have beenadmitted as he was an investigator as opposed to an “independent”;(c) The trial judge erredin finding that this was an appropriate case for a fine in lieu of forfeituregiven the purpose of such an Order (i.e. to deprive fraudsters of theirunlawful personal gain); The jury charge of the trial judgedestroy my good character and strong defenses and mislead the jury, there aremany fundamental errors in his charge such as good character is notdefense, bias is not a defense and investment loss to investors are crime. I later found that bias could deprive the jurisdiction of the courtin the extreme remedy in criminal defense THEJURY CHARGE HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES AND REVERSABLE ERRORS Reversable Errors in the Trial Judges’ Charge to the Jury If you’ve read any ofthe jury charge, it’s important to keep the words of King Solomon in mind:” Thefirst speak sound right – until the cross- examination begins” ( Proverbs18:17). In other words, when only one side of a case is heard, the evidenceoften seems convincing, yet when the whole story is in, the initial case oftencrumble. But the trial judge and judges from appeal court stop me to tellmy story. 1: Central Issue – Was the investors’ money put at risk?
|