[转帖]加拿大新新婚姻

落矶山人

我表弟一直想移民加拿大但分不够. 我想我只好牺牲这一次了.:-)

希望加拿大进一步通过多配偶婚姻,我可以帮我舅舅,舅妈全家了.

By LESLEY WRIGHT, TORONTO SUN

WHAT'S LOVE got to do with it?

Bill Dalrymple, 56, and best friend Bryan Pinn, 65, have decided to take the plunge and try out the new same-sex marriage legislation with a twist -- they're straight men.

"I think it's a hoot," Pinn said.

The proposal came last Monday on the patio of a Toronto bar amid shock and laughter from their friends. But the two -- both of whom were previously married and both of whom are still looking for a good woman to love -- insist that after the humour subsided, a real issue lies at the heart of it all.

"There are significant tax implications that we don't think the government has thought through," Pinn said.


Dalrymple has been to see a lawyer already and there are no laws in marriage that define sexual preference.

"We heteros haven't done a great job with marriage as it is," Pinn said.

They want to shed light on the widespread financial implications of the new legislation and are willing to take it all the way.

There are obvious tax benefits to marriage, they said, but insisted they don't want their nuptials to insult gays and lesbians.

"I disagree with the government getting involved with what people should and shouldn't do," Dalrymple said. "Stay out of the bedrooms."

Words of warning came from Toronto lawyer Bruce Walker, a gay and lesbian rights activist.

"Generally speaking, marriage should be for love," he said. "eople who don't marry for love will find themselves in trouble."

Since the introduction of Bill C-38, Walker considers himself retired in the fight for same-sex recognition.

Walker isn't personally insulted by the planned Pinn-Dalrymple union because he believes in personal freedoms and rights.

"If someone wants to do something foolish, let them do it," he said.

As for wedding plan, Pinn and Dalrymple haven't set a date.

http://www.torontosun.com/News/T ... 06/1161667-sun.html

feixiang2002

对于那些道德低下，没有诚信的人，的确多了一天可走的路。但请不要把这种现象归咎同性恋婚姻，而忽视这种现象的根本原因——这种非同性恋人没有诚信。

好比防盗，无论的法律多么完备，铁门多厚，要碰到没有公德的小偷强盗，他还是会进来的。而在加拿大，虽然木门、不设防盗网，入屋盗窃还是少很多。铁门也只是可以防君子不防小人。

想过来假结婚的人，他会有很多路。同性结婚是相对复杂的一条。因为你无法在国内找到结婚证，还有相对更困难的找证据你的伴侣关系。我们同性恋都难。何况这些人？

这篇所谓新新文章，如果换作一个女的，表妹，表姐，一样的移民。鄙视这种为反同而忽视人权而多方面对同性恋婚姻法攻击的人。该遭到谴责的是该当事人的没有诚信，而不是同性恋婚姻。发贴人居然以幸灾乐祸的心态，暗表对文中人的赞许，居心叵测。更可笑的是可以以道德高者自居。

落矶山人

最初由[feixiang2002]发布
对于那些道德低下，没有诚信的人，的确多了一天可走的路。但请不要把这种现象归咎同性恋婚姻，而忽视这种现象的根本原因——这种非同性恋人没有诚信。

好比防盗，无论的法律多么完备，铁门多厚，要碰到没有公德的小偷强盗，他还是会进来的。而在加拿大，虽然木门、不设防盗网，入屋盗窃还是少很多。铁门也只是可以防君子不防小人。

想过来假结婚的人，他会有很多路。同性结婚是相对复杂的一条。因为你无法在国内找到结婚证，还有相对更困难的找证据你的伴侣关系。我们同性恋都难。何况这些人？

这篇所谓新新文章，如果换作一个女的，表妹，表姐，一样的移民。鄙视这种为反同而忽视人权而多方面对同性恋婚姻法攻击的人。该遭到谴责的是该当事人的没有诚信，而不是同性恋婚姻。发贴人居然以幸灾乐祸的心态，暗表对文中人的赞许，居心叵测。更可笑的是可以以道德高者自居。

当婚姻从以家庭为中心,以孩子为重点被倒退成俩人同意的结合时,文中二位的行为就是合理合法的.

别但心, 我真正结婚时会是宗教婚姻.修改后的民事婚姻不配我们相互的承诺.

feixiang2002

最初由[落矶山人]发布


当婚姻从以家庭为中心,以孩子为重点被倒退成俩人同意的结合时,文中二位的行为就是合理合法的.

别但心, 我真正结婚时会是宗教婚姻.修改后的民事婚姻不配我们相互的承诺.

你的婚姻是你的事，我不会担心的。
当宗教教导导人向善的时候，某些人却利用这些所谓漏洞对弱势群体大肆打击。利用这种帖子混淆视听，不知道居心和在。

你觉得我们的民事婚姻法不可接受，大可不必在枫叶旗下。伊朗妇女蒙面，同性恋死刑，宗教横行，最符合你神圣的标准。

对于这个事情，落矶山人居然还包庇文中人的诚信，毫不谴责，却怪罪同性恋婚姻合法，又有什么资格站道德高位去指责别人？此贴表现其幸灾乐祸的态度，还以为自己神圣。任何圣经教导人的基本做人准则——真诚，面对主的时候，你怎么可以对得起自己的良心？