• 实时天气:多伦多 11°
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温哥华 13°
    温度感觉: 13°
  • 实时天气:卡加利
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 14°
    温度感觉: 12°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯
    温度感觉:
楼主: 轻轻地飘
打印 上一主题 下一主题

谢尔多伦多发表演说 着重吸引年轻选民

16#
发表于 2019-1-20 21:14:50 | 只看该作者
oopz 发表于 2019-1-20 20:27
有一个侮辱猪的,他能和猪比吗?

土豆比习近平草包假博士强多了,用猪跟习近平比真的是侮辱猪,你说的很好。
回复

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2019-1-20 22:06:43 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
发评论的几位,请别侮辱猪的智慧,怎么跟土豆比呢?!
回复

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 2019-1-20 22:38:55 来自触屏版 | 只看该作者
Happy_Rogers 发表于 2019-1-20 22:06
发评论的几位,请别侮辱猪的智慧,怎么跟土豆比呢?!

猪是土豆的忌讳。
回复

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2019-1-20 22:58:39 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
加拿大选谁都好不了 这个国家就是慵懒没有上进心 福利国家一般都这个德行 不遇到什么危机可以很舒服的活着 遇到危机就傻逼了没办法解决
回复

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2019-1-20 23:27:51 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
曾经加拿大国会最年轻的Skeaker,国会墙上就有人家的画像....当选保守党党领时 只有37岁。
说人家做过保险经纪的、想一想 谁刚走入社会实践就 当了CEO.....(当然 红二代 赵家人例外)
回复

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 2019-1-20 23:41:28 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
这个保守党党魁是特意针对特鲁多而挑选的年轻人,结果他的优点到现在还是“年轻”,其它实在是差强人意。

另外,估计到选举前也拿不出竞选纲领,多半也是为抢权而采取的策略……少说少错,大权在握后再随心所欲。
回复

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 2019-1-21 00:07:52 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 星洲炒米 于 2019-1-21 08:47 编辑

演讲演讲,上台后有啥打算和实际行动说说?

你要赶走非法难民吗?

你说为年轻人提供可负担住房,你能禁止一切外国人在加拿大买房和洗钱吗?

现在健康的难民来了几年根本不工作,养一堆孩子吃福利,你能让他们在一二年还不工作就停止他们的福利金吗?

另外住豪宅的报假低收入把政府福利占全,你能调查这些房产几百万收入只报二三万甚至零收入却拿加拿大低收入的各种福利的骗子吗?

...
回复

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 2019-1-21 00:15:05 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/canadian-wealth-fall-highest-g7-195300187.html

lots of readers' comments.


Top Reactions
Ron
Ron 4 days ago
This article only looks at half of the picture. It does not look a household debt as a percentage of "wealth". If you did that, Canada would be last among G7 nations since our cumulative unsecured household debt lat year was over $2.8 trillion, last among developed nations which were studied.

We have to add to this the number of bankruptcies and consumer proposals which have been made during the past eight to ten years and you have a sad picture of declining wealth and prosperity outside of the top 15% of income earners.

Something will break and it will not be foreign investors who have purchased tens of thousands of houses as investments.

What I find interesting is that the analyst has this to say:

"We're putting a lot of eggs into a few economic baskets, and if those baskets go south we could find ourselves in trouble more quickly than we think,"

Proponents for sustainable economic policies have been saying for years, decades, even, that we must diversify the economy and stop selling resources to other countries and buy them back again as manufactured products at ten or more times the price we sell them. But tell that to conservative politicians who for decades have been relying on oil and gas sector, timber, mining, water and other primary industries for provincial and federal revenue.

If you want to prepare for the future, you must balance primary, secondary and tertiary industries and diversify to the point where you are not relying on taking stuff from the ground, selling it cheaply then importing it back as manufactured goods at many times the price. That is basic economics which nearly all ministers of economy have never grasped since the days of Sir John A. MacDonald.

We need to rethink everything or face not just declining wealth and prosperity, but a near future more poor than many developing countries are now.
回复

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 2019-1-21 00:19:00 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 星洲炒米 于 2019-1-21 08:45 编辑

zvi
zvi5 days ago
According to this article the stagnant France is growing in wealth more than booming USA, and it tells you everything you need to know about all these kinds of indices. It is a fictitious assessment of potential the country has. Beyond that if you bring 350 thousand people from the Third World every year , how quality of your Labour Force can grow. If most University students studying everything else but not science and engineering how inflax of MBA and teachers can increase the quality of your Labour force? For at least 30 years everybody including economists explain to Canadians that future for them in temporarily, part time jobs in small companies, but small companies are small exactly because they don't have capital to invest in new technologies and skilled highly paid workforce and concentrated in the Service Industries which by definition have very low productivity of Labour. Money are going to houses, not Stock Exchange, oh yea money going into houses because people need to live somewhere, and houses are expensive because of set of policies executed by ruling elites. Stock exchange it is great, but any RRSP holder will tell you that at best on long term his investment on average shows no more than 3-4% growth, and with deducted inflation it is even less.
More

ReplyReplies (11)10615
bill
bill4 days ago
That's the conclusion of a research paper from the International Institute for Sustainable Development, which pointed to "the depletion of many of Canada's natural resources" as a major source of the problem...
We are giving away our resources for next to nothing...DUHHH!... Also, we have a "Branch Plant" economy. Canada is own by Foreign Corporations...
More

ReplyReplies (10)1509
ST
ST4 days ago
Our loss of wealth is due to the inability of our governments to approve things in an efficient and timely manner. Too much concern for the few over the good of the many. The various pipelines that were not built is a very good example. Our cost of housing is also attributable to the costly and lengthy approval process. As governments grow our wealth is diminished. Have a look at Greece.

ReplyReplies (5)1058
Mike
Mike4 days ago
Canada does not have a diversified economy, and it is foreign money that is buying up all our real estate, largely due to our policy of mass immigration and lax rules on foreign ownership.

ReplyReplies (8)1378
Abe
Abe4 days ago
Too much tax on small business to drive them out of the market and push them to collect welfare

ReplyReplies (2)631
oxanacanada
oxanacanada4 days ago
"Canada's current economic model "a recipe for impoverishment." If you were a money manager and you grew a client's income by eating into their wealth, "you wouldn't be in business very long," Smith quipped." - could not agree more. We are bringing half a million new people every year and we are being told it's good for the economy. "Despite increasing investments in higher education and retraining, "we are still not getting an increased return on those investments," he said. Smith suggested the problem could be partly "structural." The disappearance of manufacturing jobs, replaced by lower-paying service jobs, reduces the earnings potential of those workers." Does that mean that we simply don't need that many new people who drive our wages and salaries down?

Reply214
James
James4 days ago
Canada needs stronger leadership, who wants to invest in a country where the PM is not going to back businesses because he is far out of touch with reality (it just a drama class for him). Trudeau failed with the NAFTA agreement selling out the dairy farm, hasn't been able to get a pipeline build (getting away our natural resources) and made some apologies (weakness). There is more division in this country than even because everybody lives by different rules, especially indigenous people and people from Quebec ($13 billion equalization). And JT's solution is to continue widening these gaps.

ReplyReplies (3)485
Queen Theresa
Queen Theresa5 days ago
Too much tax that drives business away to the friendlier for business and warmer climate right next door. Add all the money we’re wasting on refugees and funding all the native real housechiefs of Canada’s lavish lifestyles it’s not surprising were heading for broke.
回复

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 2019-1-21 19:02:25 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
这个也很帅气 也靠谱
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表