News Releases Title: | Judgments in Leave Applications | Collection: | News Releases | Date: | 2016-04-07 |
SupremeCourt of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada (le fran?ais suit) JUDGMENTSIN LEAVE APPLICATIONS April 7, 2016 For immediate release OTTAWA – The SupremeCourt of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in thefollowing applications for leave to appeal. JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDESD’AUTORISATION Le 7 avril 2016 Pour diffusion immédiate Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty theQueen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) ( 36754) (The motion for an extension of time to serve and file theapplication for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel isdismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The applicationfor leave to appeal is dismissed. / La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et dedép?t de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La requête en nominationd’un procureur est rejetée. La requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments depreuve est rejetée. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.) Coram: Cromwell / Wagner / C?té
A expert react
Am shocked. Completely. Nothing to say at all.
I have read the notation of yourcase. The only reason they dismissed it is because they did not accept theaffidavit constituting new evidence. If they had accepted the new evidenceregarding Peter Boushy and Legal Aid refusal to fund counsel, you would havewon the case. But these course took the easy way and dismissed application forleave to adduce new evidence. The only thing is to write a book to expose the injustice.It is to go public. ****
|