• 实时天气:多伦多
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温哥华 10°
    温度感觉: 10°
  • 实时天气:卡加利 16°
    温度感觉: 14°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔
    温度感觉: -2°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 18°
    温度感觉: 16°
楼主: homer's fan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

华裔基督徒递请愿书反对同性婚姻法

16#
发表于 2005-3-14 00:13:23 | 只看该作者

READ THIS.

The law passed already. gay discrimination and intending/supporting anti-gay activities can be prosecuted. Sue you peasants and let you get deported.
17#
发表于 2005-3-14 01:58:31 | 只看该作者

回复:支持华裔基督徒!

最初由[黄老板]发布
支持华裔基督徒!

政府立法不可草率

支持.

什么恋都可以, 承认婚姻合法是另外一回事.

如果同性婚姻合法, 多夫多妻也应该合法, 共产共妻也应该合法. 只要当事人愿意. 否则, 就是歧视.
18#
发表于 2005-3-14 03:04:24 | 只看该作者
如果同性婚姻是合法的, 人畜婚姻也就有了合法的理由.
如果同性婚姻是合法的, 一夫多妻也应该是合法的, 一妻多夫也该是合法的. 如果自由大于常识和道德, 只要俩厢情愿就没有什么是不合法的.
如果你要移民加拿大, 请千万不要得肝炎或肺结核之类的病, 你会因此被拒之门外; 但你要是幸运地得到了艾滋病, 那你就没问题了, 因为你有" 人权", 不会被歧视.
What is fucking wrong with this country?
19#
发表于 2005-3-14 03:17:32 | 只看该作者

回复:READ THIS.

最初由[morning66]发布
READ THIS.

Chinese Christian Should not turn into Chinese suckers. Those stupidos even can not read/write English well, how come daring/bold enough to stand out and express their twisted view of the bible? Standing there looking like boorish/ill-educated peasants and trying to be considered as "religious". XX you little monsters pretending understand the scripture of bible. How come are those homophobics humiliating the good image of Chinese and how could those trashy figures be so bigoted and come to this minority-protected land to pollute the air and destroy the equality and rights.
You narrow/shallow-minded, low class, XXing "rats", go back your XXing holes to spend more time to figure out why you are so stupid and why you so much sucks. If you empty ugly creatures do not have better way to live your lives, go XX yourselves.
The law passed already. gay discrimination and intending/supporting anti-gay activities can be prosecuted. Sue you peasants and let you get deported.
如果51网是这种傻逼谩骂中国人的工具,那还不如关了的好.
20#
发表于 2005-3-14 05:48:48 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:支持华裔基督徒!

最初由[happy63]发布
回复:支持华裔基督徒!



支持.

什么恋都可以, 承认婚姻合法是另外一回事.

如果同性婚姻合法, 多夫多妻也应该合法, 共产共妻也应该合法. 只要当事人愿意. 否则, 就是歧视.

这些都是好事呀,我一点都不担心。 我担心的是,加拿大不让虐待宠物!据说把狗杀了吃还违法,不知是真是假?诺大一个多伦多,连家狗肉店都找不到!比中国落后太多了!
21#
发表于 2005-3-14 12:44:18 | 只看该作者

EDUCATED CHINESE MUST READ.

最初由[实在人]发布
如果同性婚姻是合法的, 人畜婚姻也就有了合法的理由.
如果同性婚姻是合法的, 一夫多妻也应该是合法的, 一妻多夫也该是合法的. 如果自由大于常识和道德, 只要俩厢情愿就没有什么是不合法的.
如果你要移民加拿大, 请千万不要得肝炎或肺结核之类的病, 你会因此被拒之门外; 但你要是幸运地得到了艾滋病, 那你就没问题了, 因为你有" 人权", 不会被歧视.
What is fucking wrong with this country?

So sad you chose the "wrong place" to continue your MISERABLE life. Sad you appreciate the rights you have been granted for being part of a minority group by attacking/humiliating other minority groups. Sad you put the festish behavior such as human-animal sex or polygomy as comparison with the bond between two persons who have genuin relationship and contribute to the social welfare and progress. Surprised you have all those odd/dirty thoughts in your mind and fear your evil nature would go wild if your intolerance is denied and try to find the psychological balance by saying "no" to things you are thinking all the time.
Again, Canada is a country where people are governed by law. Your angering message could/will result a legal action for your discrimination/humiliation against minority groups. Your IP address has been recorded and your message has been transfered to gay rights groups.
22#
发表于 2005-3-14 12:58:42 | 只看该作者

回复:EDUCATED CHINESE MUST READ.

最初由[morning66]发布
EDUCATED CHINESE MUST READ.
So sad you chose the "wrong place" to continue your MISERABLE life. Sad you appreciate the rights you have been granted for being part of a minority group by attacking/humiliating other minority groups. Sad you put the festish behavior such as human-animal sex or polygomy as comparison with the bond between two persons who have genuin relationship and contribute to the social welfare and progress. Surprised you have all those odd/dirty thoughts in your mind and fear your evil nature would go wild if your intolerance is denied and try to find the psychological balance by saying "no" to things you are thinking all the time.
Again, Canada is a country where people are governed by law. Your angering message could/will result a legal action for your discrimination/humiliation against minority groups. Your IP address has been recorded and your message has been transfered to gay rights groups.

支持同性婚姻享有同等权利,讨厌/反感你的说法!这跟受不受教育无关,跟是不是中国人无关!这是宗教信仰的问题,美国也因为宗教团体势力太大,不承认同性婚姻。
23#
发表于 2005-3-14 13:50:07 | 只看该作者

回复:[评论]华裔基督徒递请愿书反对同性婚姻法

最初由[不要太认真]发布
[评论]华裔基督徒递请愿书反对同性婚姻法

同性恋又不影响别人,为什么要反对?恐怕主要是因为宗教信仰的缘故吧?

不反对就是赞成,或持中间立场? 先把同性恋影响别人与否放到一边,你是赞成还是反对?
24#
发表于 2005-3-14 14:04:48 | 只看该作者
很多其他的抗议什么都很少看到中国人的身影,唯独这个,每次都有很多中国基督徒跳出来。反正没有牵涉到自己的利益,只是为了拒绝给别人提供权利。身为少数群体,却更喜欢歧视更小的少数群体,有点悲哀。 当然,每个人都有表达自己想法的权利,但为什么在这件事情上华人要当出头鸟? 让主流觉得好像中国人人人都是homophobics?希望不是给人利用了。

很多省1年前都已经允许同性婚姻了,天也没有塌下来,犯罪率也没有因此提高。还是多多参加像3。11游行这样有的游行更有意义!
25#
发表于 2005-3-14 14:51:51 | 只看该作者
请大家先把主题搞清楚了,现在加拿大讨论的重新定义婚姻的问题,同性婚姻如果也包括在修改后的婚姻定义中,你不觉得这是对婚姻的亵渎吗?说到歧视,没有人因为你是同性恋而会歧视你,这和婚姻的定义是两码事。
26#
发表于 2005-3-14 15:28:15 | 只看该作者

What??!!

最初由[说不过去不行]发布
请大家先把主题搞清楚了,现在加拿大讨论的重新定义婚姻的问题,同性婚姻如果也包括在修改后的婚姻定义中,你不觉得这是对婚姻的亵渎吗?说到歧视,没有人因为你是同性恋而会歧视你,这和婚姻的定义是两码事。

What are you talking about?! Letting two people loving each other get married (monogomy with all bound responsibilities) is immoral?! What is your moral code? What does your moral code come from? Same sex marriage is not only about the defination of a civil marriage, but also the fundamental human rights. You think depriving of committed gay couples many basic rights affiliated with the defination of "spouse" and "dependent" is moral? Be rational and logical. Same sex couples have not interfered with the rights and marriage benefits entitled to any heterosexual couple; heterosexual marriage has never been threatened; change of the legal defination can not and will not alter any existing/potential heterosexual relationship unless there is something weird/secretive going on there; change of the legal defination of civil marriage can not and will not transform a heterosexual into a homosexual unless the very heterosexual is a long "closeted" homosexual; change of the legal defination of civil marriage will grant equality and many long-waited basic rights to the two PEOPLE who are in love and genuine relationship. Wake up!! Stop bullying/attacking other minority groups. You are from a minority too. Wake up and use your brain to think rationally! It is a civil marriage. Your religious rights are protected (assuming you really understand what your faith is).
27#
发表于 2005-3-14 15:54:42 | 只看该作者

CONFUSION TO BE CLARIFIED.

最初由[不要太认真]发布
回复:EDUCATED CHINESE MUST READ.



支持同性婚姻享有同等权利,讨厌/反感你的说法!这跟受不受教育无关,跟是不是中国人无关!这是宗教信仰的问题,美国也因为宗教团体势力太大,不承认同性婚姻。

Thanks for the rational thinking and tolerating opinion about the progressive defination of civil marriage. Sorry for having to link this news with "ill-educated" and "Chinese" because this is the very fact presented in many media too. Based on the culture charisteristcs and hundreds of years of history of the civilized Chinese, it is not difficult to take the perspective and form a judgement that what the "Chinese Christian" group's behavior is not only about religion. Think deeper about the what they have done after all. Have you ever heard this group campaigned to preserve the greenland? Have you ever heard this group campaigned to stop child sexual abuse? Have you ever heard this group campaigned to promote social welfare? What are they doing now?! It is very ugly, very bigoted, very intolerating. What happened in USA(the amendent of constitution in some states) have to be considered in a political view. It is not only about religion either. After all, Canada is Canada, USA is USA. The debates about a similar issue in two nations can not be mixed up. Even though you like to make a comparison, when you look into the situation, you won't be surprised how significantly the level of edcuation can influence people's thinking. No offence. It is just fact and statistic figures. Bottom line: Being a Chinese, having the privilege to settle in Canada, it is crucial to respect other minority and be willing to share the equality and fundermental human rights with other groups, especially when the rights being given already is not threatened/damaged at all. The civil marriage is not only about a defination, it is about rights. It is freedom but it is not promiscuous. Same sex marriage never encourages promiscuous behaviour. It is a defination based on the desire for a stable bond under the sky with maple leaves which are the same red in every corner.
28#
发表于 2005-3-14 15:56:10 | 只看该作者

回复:What??!!

最初由[morning66]发布
What??!!



What are you talking about?! Letting two people loving each other get married (monogomy with all bound responsibilities) is immoral?! What is your moral code? What does your moral code come from? Same sex marriage is not only about the defination of a civil marriage, but also the fundamental human rights. You think depriving of committed gay couples many basic rights affiliated with the defination of "spouse" and "dependent" is moral? Be rational and logical. Same sex couples have not interfered with the rights and marriage benefits entitled to any heterosexual couple; heterosexual marriage has never been threatened; change of the legal defination can not and will not alter any existing/potential heterosexual relationship unless there is something weird/secretive going on there; change of the legal defination of civil marriage can not and will not transform a heterosexual into a homosexual unless the very heterosexual is a long "closeted" homosexual; change of the legal defination of civil marriage will grant equality and many long-waited basic rights to the two PEOPLE who are in love and genuine relationship. Wake up!! Stop bullying/attacking other minority groups. You are from a minority too. Wake up and use your brain to think rationally! It is a civil marriage. Your religious rights are protected (assuming you really understand what your faith is).

Come on, you do not have to be so excited! I love to discuss with people quietly, argument is normal and necessary in a free country like Canada, but please support your idea with evidences! not only slogans!
May I extend your idea a little bit? suppose a person love his/her pet so much, and they want to get married legally, do you agree or not?
29#
发表于 2005-3-14 16:23:05 | 只看该作者
The same qestion can be extened like this as well. Since a man can marry a woman, why can't a man marry a female pet?

It's nothing about same sex marriage.
30#
发表于 2005-3-14 16:35:48 | 只看该作者

回复:CONFUSION TO BE CLARIFIED.

最初由[morning66]发布
CONFUSION TO BE CLARIFIED.



Bottom line:?.  you still have bottom line about the definition of marriage? Do you respect that person's right to marry his/her pet?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表