奥巴马签署《孟山都保护法》 无论问题多大联邦法院都不得停播和停售

克 飞

http://www.awaker.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/monsanto.jpg

据报道，尽管有25万人联署反对，奥巴马上周二还是签署了这一埋藏在78页法律中的《孟山都保护法》。该法案有利于孟山都等转基因公司向民众兜售转基因作物，即使出现对人身体有害或者造成环境污染的情况下，也能避免联邦法院的制裁。许多食品安全的倡导者认为现在还没有对转基因种子和作物的潜在危害做足够的研究，若潜在危害显露时，法律是阻止转基因公司兜售和种植转基因作物的关键手段。然而《孟山都保护法案》的签署使得民众无法再用法律手段来维护自己的权利。

据IB Times 揭露，这个法案由孟山都支持的共和党议员Roy Blunt提出，由Blunt与孟山都共同撰写.

另据华盛顿时报指出，这个法案的通过被许多像先正达公司、美国嘉吉公司和孟山都视为胜利。这些公司自2009年以来就向国会捐助750万美元，以及向参议院拨款委员会捐助37.2万美元。（据今日俄罗斯，IB Times 等）

这个HR 933法案主要是为了避免政府倒闭，确保联邦政府在未来6个月内能够支付其账单。

但食品和公共安全的倡导者和有机农民对奥巴马总统签署该法案感到愤怒，他们认为这是送给孟山都公司和其他生产转基因生物公司的一份大礼。

示威者在过去几天在白宫前示威，首先打电话给奥巴马要他否决该法案，现在则批评他不该这样做。

示威者接着发起大规模的请愿活动，收集超过20万的签名希望奥巴马否决HR 933法案，以阻止第735条 – 所谓的“孟山都保护法“ – 被编入法律。

孟山都保护法：你该知道有关第933条法案的五件事情

1.孟山都保护法使得联邦法院不得停止销售、种植基改作物，无论这些作物出现什么问题
2.立法提案者与孟山都公司间有明显的利益关系
3.第933条法案是个支出法案，旨在迫使联邦政府持续补助
4.就算是美国总统也无能为力阻止这个法案
5.该法案虽然只有六个月有效期，但却成为了政府替财团背书的先例

有了这项由孟山都支持的参议员Roy Blunt提出的法案，孟山都与其他的基改食品企业往后都不需要标示基改食品，而且也不再受到联邦法院限制禁止种植／销售有安全疑虑的种子。

MONSANTO与其背后邪恶势力的计划是：令全球的土地都种基因改造食物，因为，种过基因改造食物的土地以后只能种基因改造食物，以后都不能种任何其他植物食物，种基因改造食物的一定要用MONSANTO的杀虫剂。

垄断了食物之后，他们在政治上就成了极权，大家都要听美国政府与其联盟的话! 所有天然药物全部消失，若你有病，只能被迫用他们西药厂的药。至于吃过基因改造食物之后，我们因身体所产生的变异、病变，他们不但不会理会，还会很高兴，因为这样他们的西药厂可以赚得更多。对大自然环境食物链所做成的不可逆转的祸害更不用说了。

简而言之，一收买到你国家的元首官员，准许他们开始输入他们的种子，你的国家便完了，你国家的未来也完了！

政治的游戏，金钱权力的游戏，他们是这样子玩的……当你国家内的左派跟右派在互骂，分裂，美国在背后推动着你国家的分裂、收买着你国家官员、把握着每个机会在媒体上强化其民主自由品牌形象的时候……。

克 飞

美国政府悄悄通过《孟山都保护法》，让谁羞愧？　

据报道，尽管有25万人联署反对，奥巴马上周二还是签署了这一埋藏在78页法律中的《孟山都保护法》。该法案有利于孟山都等转基因公司向民众兜售转基因作物，即使出现对人身体有害或者造成环境污染的情况下，也能避免联邦法院的制裁。许多食品安全的倡导者认为现在还没有对转基因种子和作物的潜在危害做足够的研究，若潜在危害显露时，法律是阻止转基因公司兜售和种植转基因作物的关键手段。然而《孟山都保护法案》的签署使得民众无法再用法律手段来维护自己的权利。
　　据美国著名财经媒体国际财经日报IB Times 揭露，这个法案由孟山都支持的共和党议员Roy Blunt提出，由Blunt与孟山都共同撰写.
　　另据华盛顿时报指出，这个法案的通过被许多像先正达公司、美国嘉吉公司和孟山都视为胜利。这些公司自2009年以来就向国会捐助750万美元，以及向参议院拨款委员会捐助37.2万美元。（据今日俄罗斯，IB Times 等）
　　Furor Growing Against Obama Over 'Monsanto Protection Act'
　　原文链接：http://www.ibtimes.com/furor-gro ... ection-act-1156459#
　　Anger is growing against President Barack Obama the day after he signed into law a spending bill that included a provision opponents have dubbed the "Monsanto Protection Act."
　　food and public safety advocates and independent farmers are furious that Obama signed it despite its inclusion of language that they consider to be a gift to Monsanto Company (NYSE:MON) and other firms that produce genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or genetically engineered (GE) seeds and crops.
　　And protesters have spent the past couple of days demonstrating in front of the White House, first calling on Obama to veto the bill, and now criticizing him for his failure to do so.
　　The protests come on the heels of a massive petition campaign organized by the advocacy group Food Democracy Now, which gathered the signatures of more than 200,000 people who wanted Obama to veto HR 933 in order to stop Section 735 -- the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act" -- from being codified into law.
　　But Obama ignored it, instead choosing to sign a bill that effectively bars federal courts from being able to halt the sale or planting of GMO or GE crops and seeds, no matter what health consequences from the consumption of these products may come to light in the future.
　　"This provision is simply an industry ploy to continue to sell genetically engineered seeds even when a court of law has found they were approved by USDA illegally," the petition stated. "It is unnecessary and an unprecedented attack on U.S. judicial review. Congress should not be meddling with the judicial review process based solely on the special interest of a handful of companies."
　　Many food safety advocates maintain that there have not been enough studies into the potential health risks of GMO and GE seeds and crops, and the judicial power to stop companies from selling or planting them was one key recourse they were relying on to stop them from being sold if health risks come to light.
　　But the "Monsanto Protection Act" -- referred to as the "Farmer Assurance Provision" by its supporters -- removes that course of action, and those who are angry at Obama for signing the bill are also incensed with Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D- Md., who is accused of failing to give the amendment that inserted the language a proper hearing.
　　附文：
　　Monsanto Wrote Monsanto Protection Act
　　原文链接：http://readersupportednews.org/o ... anto-protection-act
　　'Monsanto Protection Act' slips silently through US Congress
　　http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-congress-silently-slips-830/
　　So, just how much of a victory is this for biotech companies like Monsanto? Critics are thus far alarmed by the very way in which the provision made it through Congress -- the rider was introduced anonymously as the larger bill progressed through the Senate Appropriations Committee. Now, groups like the Center for Food Safety are holding Senator Mikulski (D-MD), chairman of that committee, to task and lobbing accusations of a “backroom deal” with the biotech industry.
　　As the Washington Times points out, the provision’s success is viewed by many as a victory by companies like Syngenta Corp, Cargill, Monsanto and affiliated PACs that have donated $7.5 million to members of Congress since 2009, and $372,000 to members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

克 飞

很多投票的人居然不知道有上面红字这一条。。。这种实质上是政府部门在陈述法案时的Error & Omission ，象这种情况，在一个还有法制概念的国家，陈述法案的人应该被开除并罚款，这个法案也应该从新投票。

当然美国如果是一个无法无天的国家，就另当别论了。

克 飞

这个世界还有这样的法律，转基因产品就是有害也不能阻止。。。也是现代法制的奇耻大辱。
美国必将被钉在人类历史的耻辱柱上。