• 实时天气:多伦多 10°
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温哥华 10°
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:卡加利 17°
    温度感觉: 16°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 19°
    温度感觉: 18°
楼主: kanada
打印 上一主题 下一主题

星报“大战”福特市长:到底谁是谁非?

 
31#
发表于 2011-12-23 16:05:19 | 只看该作者
Kanada有点"舌战群儒"的味道.很搞笑.看来是有闲阶级.很高兴从网上看到还是明白人多呀. kanada你就不要"瞎子摸大象"啦.
回复

使用道具 举报

32#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-24 21:24:11 | 只看该作者
看来你对苗大为颇为不满,如果你觉得福特不好,你要是当上了市长,应该怎么做?
福特是做生意出身,而且看的长远,全面。不要眼中只盯着这几个钱,而且垃圾工外包,这是个正确的选择,垃圾工在私营企业就是盈利,而在政府就是包袱。不能把这两件事相提并论。
Transit city也是正确的选择,轻轨影响市容市貌,而且防止噪声需要大量的钱,如果建成,将来再拆,将会损失更大。
市长作必要的财务检查是应该的,这叫做审计。
学着点。
大忽悠 发表于 2011-12-23 13:33

嗬嗬,我对苗大为当然不满了,苗大为得问题是太能花钱了。
福特是做生意出身不错,你要说他看的长远,全面,实在是太抬举他了。他的问题,脑子不够用,且心胸狭隘!他唯一的作用是给苗大为擦屁股!擦完屁股,四年后走人。当然,能擦好屁股也不错呦!
如果我当上了市长,应该怎么做?你问得好,可是我不敢说呀!就网友们的口水就能把人淹死!
回复

使用道具 举报

33#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-24 21:29:38 | 只看该作者
Kanada有点"舌战群儒"的味道.很搞笑.看来是有闲阶级.很高兴从网上看到还是明白人多呀. kanada你就不要"瞎子摸大象"啦.
heleng 发表于 2011-12-23 16:05


"舌战群儒"?你是在是太抬举他们和你自己了,这有"儒"吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

34#
发表于 2011-12-26 02:21:26 | 只看该作者
真能钻牛角尖,连比喻都不懂。还自以为是呢。
回复

使用道具 举报

35#
发表于 2011-12-26 10:28:04 | 只看该作者
AN OPEN LETTER

A Call to Eliminate Anti-Asian Racism

November 23, 2010



We, the undersigned, believe that the “Too Asian”? article in the Maclean’smagazine and the “Asian students suffering for success” article in the Toronto Star newspaper, published on November 10, 2010, worked to racially profile and stereotype Asian Canadians as perpetual foreigners in Canada. These articles served to reinforce anti-Asian resentment and antagonism by raising anxieties over Canada’s changing demographics and the emergence of China and India as global powers. Both media outlets generated binary “us” versus “them” distinctions between white and Asian Canadians, consequently inciting racial antipathy and division, instead of fostering a constructive dialogue on diversity and integration.

The articles symbolize the failure of Maclean’s and the Toronto Starto uphold their journalistic and corporate social responsibility. The damaging impact of racial stereotyping and antagonism is far-reaching, not just in the realms of media, business, education, workplace, and the society at large, but also to the targeted ethno-cultural individuals and communities.

Maclean’s and the Toronto Star recycled historical and ongoing depictions of Asians as “yellow and brown perils” that threaten the Canadian social order. These media depictions remind us of past anti-Asian government legislation, programs, and public thinking. The Head Tax and Immigration Exclusion laws, the Continuous Journey regulations, and the World War II Internment targeted the Chinese, South Asian, and Japanese Canadian communities, respectively. In 1979 the CTV television news series W5portrayed Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Asian descent as “foreigners,” allegedly taking over Canadian educational institutions. We see Maclean’sand the Toronto Staras reinforcing a long and deeply ingrained history of anti-Asian racial anxiety that has led to bigoted profiling and discrimination of Asian Canadians.

The media’s racial distinction of “us” versus “them” works within a troubling understanding of Canada in which white people or those of European descent are considered the sole rightful citizens and beneficiaries of the nation. Such an understanding makes it difficult to conceive of Canadian universities as educational institutions where Asians as well as Aboriginal peoples and other communities of colour, such as African, Caribbean, Latin American, and Middle Eastern peoples, can also belong. Racialized individuals and communities face challenges to their claims of belonging when certain institutions and entitlements are already deemed as not for them.

The media often portray Asian Canadians in homogeneous ways and fail to account for diversity within the group. They do not distinguish among Asians who are Canadian-born, naturalized citizens, newcomer immigrants, or international students. They neglect to consider the varying educational circumstances of Asian Canadians based on income, class, gender, religion, and language. They lump all Asian Canadians together regardless of their ancestral background, whether they are from China, India, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam, or Sri Lanka. Since Maclean’sand the Toronto Stardepicted Asian Canadians as a homogeneous model minority, they failed to acknowledge the various structural roots of the academic and social struggles that many Asian Canadian students experience. They also missed seeing how community groups are addressing barriers that hinder their goals and pathways for genuine settlement, integration, and well-being in this country.

Although Asian Canadians have been and continue to be discriminated against by racist media portrayals, government policies, and some public opinion, they also have been actively recruited for their labour and capital. Their labour has been crucial to the development of this nation, ranging from the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway 125 years ago to the recruitment of temporary workers and live-in caregivers of children and the elderly over the last 25 years. Their financial resources have been keenly sought after, as they are considered economic migrants who could bring investment and entrepreneurial capital, and as international students whose high tuition fees augment the inadequate funding of public education. Many Canadian universities aggressively reach out to and recruit students from Asia.

As such, Asian Canadians are trapped in a perpetual racist contradiction: they are both wanted and unwanted in this country. So long as they provide labour, capital, and expertise to the Canadian economy, they are wanted. However, when they assert their entitlement to human rights, genuine integration, and even education in Canada, their sense of belonging is challenged.

Since the media – as well as educational institutions – have perpetrated racial stereotyping, oppression, and antagonism, they need to change their policies and practices in order to help realize the promise of a truly multicultural Canada.

Therefore, we demand that Maclean’s and the Toronto Star:

·      must issue a comprehensive and unqualified public apology to Asian Canadians;

·      must engage in public consultations to address racial profiling and stereotyping via their media outlets;

·      must implement measurable corporate and editorial anti-racism policies in consultation with relevant community constituents, and must publish the results of their policies annually;

·      and, must implement employment equity programs to diversify their corporate and editorial boards and frontline personnel.

We also demand that Canadian institutions of higher education:

·      must develop academic programs and courses that explicitly address racism in Canada and the historical and contemporary experiences, representations, and contributions of Asian Canadians;

·      must undertake and publish campus climate surveys of racialized students, staff, and faculty;

·      and, must establish advocacy and support offices for racialized students, staff, and faculty.


We sign this open letter in solidarity with principles and struggles to eliminate anti-Asian racism.


Sincerely,

Canadian coalition of community partners to eliminate anti-Asian racism


National Anti-Racism Council of Canada

Estella Muyinda,
中 加 关 系 发表于 2011-12-5 12:41


多伦多星报就是那个2010年发表歧视亚裔的头版头条社论"asian students suffering for success", 遭到大批亚裔抗议却一直拒绝道歉的种族主义媒体. 看看上面的抗议信. 有点血性的亚裔, 都不应该直接或间接的维护这样的媒体.
回复

使用道具 举报

36#
发表于 2011-12-26 10:31:25 | 只看该作者
这个Kanana也许很高兴进入维护种族主义媒体多伦多星报的猪流了.
回复

使用道具 举报

37#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-26 11:06:41 | 只看该作者
真能钻牛角尖,连比喻都不懂。还自以为是呢。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 02:21


不是不懂你的比喻,而是有些人实在太..., 配不上"舌战群儒"这个词!
回复

使用道具 举报

38#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-26 11:09:38 | 只看该作者
这个Kanana也许很高兴进入维护种族主义媒体多伦多星报的猪流了.
加拿大老张 发表于 2011-12-26 10:31


今天他封杀星报,明天他就可以明报,globe mail,后天可能就轮到你
批评福特就等于维护星报吗?
拜托把基本的逻辑搞清楚再发言!
回复

使用道具 举报

39#
发表于 2011-12-26 15:07:51 | 只看该作者

星报“大战”福特市长:到底谁是谁非?

本帖最后由 加拿大老张 于 2011-12-26 15:12 编辑
今天他封杀星报,明天他就可以明报,globe mail,后天可能就轮到你
kanada 发表于 2011-12-26 11:09


你在偷换概念, 什么时候加拿大的市长能封杀当地的报纸? 福特那是抵制星报. 你还是先回去搞清楚汉语里封杀和抵制的区别吧, 太小儿科了. 顺便说一句, global mail发表过批评福特的文章, 可是福特并没有抵制global mail, 大概福特还没有你那么小鸡肚肠. 你们贵族工会的对福特的市府裁员节支很不满, 我知道.

那些抗议星报种族主义社论"asian students suffering for sucess"又不道歉的亚裔也在抵制星报.抵制种族主义媒体是每个人的权利, 作为亚裔你不想抵制种族主义的星报,是你的选择.
回复

使用道具 举报

40#
发表于 2011-12-26 15:59:22 | 只看该作者

星报“大战”福特市长:到底谁是谁非?

本帖最后由 heleng 于 2011-12-26 21:35 编辑

看来你还是没懂。“比喻”是用相似或类似的事物做说明,不存在“配不上”的问题。在这里的相似点是你“舌战”,噢,更正一下,是“网战” (免得你又叫真儿,挑字眼儿)来自四面八方的反对意见。可是,你那么针尖对麦芒的昂扬斗志,实际的立足点是“瞎子摸大象”。根本就是片面的,有点“攻其一点(请不要在”一点“这个词上叫真儿)不及其余”。
回复

使用道具 举报

41#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-26 21:29:19 | 只看该作者
你在偷换概念, 什么时候加拿大的市长能封杀当地的报纸? 福特那是抵制星报. 你还是先回去搞清楚汉语里封杀和抵制的区别吧, 太小儿科了. 顺便说一句, global mail发表过批评福特的文章, 可是福特并没有抵制global mail, 大概福特还没有你那么小鸡肚肠. 你们贵族工会的对福特的市府裁员节支很不满, 我知道.

那些抗议星报种族主义社论"asian students suffering for sucess"又不道歉的亚裔也在抵制星报.抵制种族主义媒体是每个人的权利, 作为亚裔你不想抵制种族主义的星报,是你的选择.
加拿大老张 发表于 2011-12-26 15:07

说星报有偏见就转一篇 globe mail 的
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/toronto/mayor-fords-freeze-out-of-toronto-star-has-little-precedent/article2259036/

Since taking office a year ago, his office has given the Star the silent treatment, leaving its reporters off the distribution list of communiqués, invitations to press conferences, and other announcements of official business.
请解释一下,这叫什么?
福特个人拒绝接受星报采访,没问题,这是你个人的喜好。
但是在市长的位子上,在有关市政的公务,对媒体采取这种手段,封杀也好,抵制也好,怎么看都是公报私仇。这恰恰证明了福特的小鸡肚肠
回复

使用道具 举报

42#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-26 21:37:26 | 只看该作者
看来你还是没懂。“比喻”是用相似或类似的事物做说明,不存在“配不上”的问题。在这里的相似点是你“舌战”,噢,更正一下,是“网战” (免得你又叫真儿,挑字眼儿)来自四面八方的反对意见。可是,你那么针尖对麦芒的昂扬斗志,实际的立足点是“瞎子摸大象。根本就是片面的,有点“攻其一点(请不要在”一点“这个词上叫真儿)不及其余”。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 15:59

说来说去,你的意思不就是说我没有说福特的好话吗?对吧。
溜须拍马,歌功颂德,盲听盲从的事留给福卫兵们和广大需要被领导的人民群众去做就行了。多我一个不多,少我一个不少。我喜欢干点别人不爱干或者干不了的事。
回复

使用道具 举报

43#
发表于 2011-12-26 21:52:11 | 只看该作者
“溜须拍马,歌功颂德,盲听盲从的事留给福卫兵们和广大需要被领导的人民群众去做就行了”
------话说得有些胡搅蛮缠了。
“我喜欢干点别人......干不了的事”。
------很自恋。
回复

使用道具 举报

44#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-26 22:00:46 | 只看该作者
“溜须拍马,歌功颂德,盲听盲从的事留给福卫兵们和广大需要被领导的人民群众去做就行了”
------话说得有些胡搅蛮缠了。
“我喜欢干点别人......干不了的事”。
------很自恋。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 21:52


我自恋不自恋不重要,因为我不是市长!
觉得我胡搅蛮缠的话,你可以赶紧升任版主,这样就可以封杀我喽!
回复

使用道具 举报

45#
发表于 2011-12-27 01:49:27 | 只看该作者

星报“大战”福特市长:到底谁是谁非?

本帖最后由 heleng 于 2011-12-27 01:51 编辑

?????????????????????????????????????? & !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表