• 实时天气:多伦多 28°
    温度感觉: 27°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 21°
    温度感觉: 23°
  • 实时天气:卡加利 28°
    温度感觉: 26°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 24°
    温度感觉: 28°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 24°
    温度感觉: 24°
楼主: canadafreeword
打印 上一主题 下一主题

多伦多市政工人罢工:我们不作人质

16#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:03:12 | 只看该作者

http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/

一帮子新移民 老大叔的,懂个屁阿,拿着你在国内的那套东西来分析北美形态。懂什么啊,装的


应该仔细研读加拿大自由和人权宪章 (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/cha ... �杀无辜。。。

我可爱的加拿大,我可憎的加拿大。

这就是现实。
回复

使用道具 举报

17#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:09:19 | 只看该作者
罢工也就罢了,但是阻断交通, 阻止市民自己把垃圾送到垃圾站就有点过了。
回复

使用道具 举报

18#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:15:05 | 只看该作者
全是一帮地痞流氓。
回复

使用道具 举报

19#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:18:27 | 只看该作者
Taylor Law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
        This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. (September 2008)

The Public Employees Fair Employment Act (more commonly known as the Taylor Law) refers to Article 14 of the New York State Civil Service Law, which defines the rights and limitations of unions for public employees in New York.

New York State statute named for labor researcher George W. Taylor authorizing a governor-appointed State Public Employment Relations Board to resolve contract disputes for public employees while curtailing their right to strike. Mediation and binding arbitration are intended to give voice to unions while work stoppages are made punishable with fines and jail time. The United Federation of Teachers and the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association challenged the Taylor Law at its 1967 inception. Following a 2005 strike, Transit Workers’ president Roger Toussaint was incarcerated for three days as per a Taylor Law ruling.
Contents
[hide]

    * 1 Details
    * 2 History
    * 3 Criticism and reform
    * 4 External links

[edit] Details

The Taylor Law grants public employees the right to organize and elect their union representatives. It defines the boundaries for public employers in negotiating and entering into agreements with these public unions. The law also defines the terms for the foundation of the Public Employment Relations Board, a state agency that administers the law in matters related to public strike negotiation. The board consists of three members appointed by the governor. Each member must be approved by the senate, and only two can be of the same political party.

One of the most controversial parts of the Taylor Law is Section 210, which prohibits New York state public employees from striking, compelling binding PERB arbitration in the event of an impasse in negotiations. The fine for striking is twice the employee's salary for each day the strike lasts.

[edit] History

    * The law was put into effect in 1967, following costly transit strikes the previous year.
    * Since its declaration, the law has been cited in averting several potential transit strikes. The fine was applied during the New York City Transit Authority 1980 transit strike and was applied again in the 2005 New York City transit strike.
    * During the 2005 transit strike, both the workers and the employers violated portions of the Taylor Law. Section 210 states that the workers are not allowed to strike; Section 201 Part 4 states that employers are not allowed to negotiate benefits provided by a public retirement fund or payment to a fund or insurer to provide an income for retirees.
    * As of December 20, 2005, the New York State Supreme Court in Kings County (Brooklyn), declared the Transport Workers Union Local 100 in violation of the Taylor Law, and issued a fine of $1,000,000 per day, pursuant with the guidelines set forth in the law.
    * The Taylor Law is named for George W. Taylor, chairman of the commission appointed by Nelson Rockefeller to propose amendments to the Condon-Wadlin Law. Taylor was a professor of industrial research at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton school for forty years before his death in 1972. He served as an advisor on labor relations issues to Presidents Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson. Taylor was a strong supporter of the strike in private sector bargaining.

[edit] Criticism and reform

While government officials support the Taylor Law as a way of preventing strikes by municipal unions in New York, the unions contend that the law is harsh on them. The labor unions also contend that the Taylor Law does not provide government agencies the incentive to negotiate contracts on a timely basis and negotiate the terms of the contract in good faith. There have been lobbying efforts by municipal unions to the New York state legislature to change the Taylor Law. There is some resistance or reluctance on reforming the law.

With the creation and assistance of the Taylor Law, members of many organizations including the Albany Fire Department were able to unionize, becoming one of the strongest political organizations. The year 1970 saw the birth of Union Local 2007, which was also responsible in paving the way for all other public sector unions in the City of Albany, New York.

The Taylor Law has been a frequent target for upstate New York activists, as it severely limits the ability of governments to limit spending on unionized labor, with minimal recourse in the event the unions illegally strike.[citation needed]The Buffalo Teachers Federation, for instance, illegally struck in September 2000, delaying the start of the school year, with the only consequences being a fine for every work day the teachers were on strike.[citation needed] High labor expenses, fueled mostly by above-inflation pay increases to the teachers, firefighters, and police officers, eventually led to massive layoffs and the institution of a wage freeze and an appointed control board in the city of Buffalo.[citation needed] After several years of the wage freeze, the city's budget went from deficit to surplus; after the freeze was lifted, Buffalo Public Schools once again fell back to a huge deficit.[citation needed]

Buffalo developer Carl Paladino has cited the Taylor Law as one of the major problems facing New York State and a reason for calling for a constitutional convention to wholly reform the current state government.
回复

使用道具 举报

20#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:20:35 | 只看该作者
作者看来是苗大为的支持者,市民不做工会的人质,就做了苗大为的人质!你以为他这次强硬是为了市民的利益吗?只是为了多加税找一个借口而已!这个万税市长上台后挟持市民的事做得还少吗?为了给他们自己加工资,每辆在多伦多注册的车要多付60刀登记税一年,为了他的选票,缩小Downtown一条车道为不见踪影的骑车人开辟自行车道,他知道吗,车辆被堵所多排放的废气远远比那几个骑车人放弃汽车而少排放的废气要多的多。要拆掉Gardina高速进一步堵塞Downtown交通的也是这个人,所以民主制度其实也就是如此。普通市民无论在哪个制度下面,都是任人宰割的。
回复

使用道具 举报

21#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:26:25 | 只看该作者

最后的结果是纳税人买单

回复

使用道具 举报

22#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:35:04 | 只看该作者
华人都不投票,让老苗上台,活该啊!下次要坚决把他赶下台.40万华人,只要我们都不投NDP(庙过去是NDP的)的票,他就得下台,


有道理, 自由党和NDP都和大工会关系密切, 看看自由党省府对百姓要求发布复工令的观望态度就知道了, 只有在大工会罢工的关键时刻, 才能充分表现左翼政党对大工会的密切关系, 百姓的利益被放在了第二位.

华人应该出来投票, 并与大工会关系密切的自由党和NDP这样的左翼政党保持一定的距离, 他们首先保护大工会的利益.
回复

使用道具 举报

23#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:37:17 | 只看该作者
你的态度错的很离谱:
1,社会基础服务的工人,不能像企业工人那样享有普遍的罢工权利,因为罢工的后果是不同的。你不能光强调每个人都有点火的权利,因为点炮仗和点核弹是不同的概念。
2,罢工发生后,市民们不应该坐在家里哑忍和愤怒,应该组织一起来,积极充当垃圾清理义工,既保证了市容的清洁,又打击了不义的工会。
回复

使用道具 举报

24#
发表于 2009-6-26 09:37:18 | 只看该作者
作者看来是苗大为的支持者,市民不做工会的人质,就做了苗大为的人质!你以为他这次强硬是为了市民的利益吗?只是为了多加税找一个借口而已!这个万税市长上台后挟持市民的事做得还少吗?为了给他们自己加工资,每辆在多伦多注册的车要多付60刀登记税一年,为了他的选票,缩小Downtown一条车道为不见踪影的骑车人开辟自行车道,他知道吗,车辆被堵所多排放的废气远远比那几个骑车人放弃汽车而少排放的废气要多的多。要拆掉Gardina高速进一步堵塞Downtown交通的也是这个人,所以民主制度其实也就是如此。普通市民无论在哪个制度下面,都是任人宰割的。



苗大为在台上就是多敛钱, 再瞎折腾把钱都花光.
回复

使用道具 举报

25#
发表于 2009-6-26 10:25:18 | 只看该作者
有道理, 自由党和NDP都和大工会关系密切, 看看自由党省府对百姓要求发布复工令的观望态度就知道了, 只有在大工会罢工的关键时刻, 才能充分表现左翼政党对大工会的密切关系, 百姓的利益被放在了第二位.

华人应该出来投票, 并与大工会关系密切的自由党和NDP这样的左翼政党保持一定的距离, 他们首先保护大工会的利益.

Mel Lastman 和 Mike Harris 在台上时是不是没有罢工,没有工会啊!政客就是政客,党棍就是党棍。选谁上去都是一球样。建设,维护好这个国家,城市,社区靠的是你我他。大家尽量减少垃圾,不乱到垃圾,义务清理垃圾,保护环境,没什么大不了的。
回复

使用道具 举报

26#
发表于 2009-6-26 10:41:17 | 只看该作者
人家罢工发挥的是团队精神。市民如果也都团结起来,对付这场罢工力量一定会超过工会。关键是如何组织市民维护城市的良好秩序。
回复

使用道具 举报

27#
发表于 2009-6-26 10:51:32 | 只看该作者
你的态度错的很离谱:
1,社会基础服务的工人,不能像企业工人那样享有普遍的罢工权利,因为罢工的后果是不同的。你不能光强调每个人都有点火的权利,因为点炮仗和点核弹是不同的概念。
2,罢工发生后,市民们不应该坐在家里哑忍和愤怒,应该组织一起来,积极充当垃圾清理义工,既保证了市容的清洁,又打击了不义的工会。
赞成。
任何社会都不会是完美的,都需要发现问题解决问题,逐步完善,当然还是不会至善至美。工会同工会不一样,尤其当某种工会势力太大,严重影响了民众,就要有一个能管束它的机构,让民众有地方去申诉,去游行示威,前提是理性的合法的。不知省议会是不是这种机构,如果是,民众就应该到那里去。政府不要把事情拖得太久,会让民众很失望,而且有样学样。  再有,如何控制有关政府各类人员工资不合理的增长,减少民众的负担也是需要探讨的,尤其是现阶段。
回复

使用道具 举报

28#
发表于 2009-6-26 10:58:20 | 只看该作者
Mel Lastman 和 Mike Harris 在台上时是不是没有罢工,没有工会啊!政客就是政客,党棍就是党棍。选谁上去都是一球样。建设,维护好这个国家,城市,社区靠的是你我他。大家尽量减少垃圾,不乱到垃圾,义务清理垃圾,保护环境,没什么大不了的。


Mel Lastman在台上时也有罢工, 可是没怎么加税,市府还有几亿的储备金. 到左翼的苗大伟上台, 罢工照样有, 第一个任期内先花光了市府的几亿元储备金, 第二个任期就加了好几种税. 没有绝对好的市长, 右翼的Mel Lastman和左翼的苗大伟哪个对市民搜刮的轻一点?

市民都象你这样被大工会罢工害了就骂几句完了, 不出来投票, 下次还是得到大工会支持的左翼政客上台, 各种税接着加, 罢工政府不管.

至于你说的"建设,维护好这个国家,城市,社区靠的是你我他。大家尽量减少垃圾,不乱到垃圾,义务清理垃圾,保护环境", 恐怕是没太多人这么干, 还是想点实在的事吧.
回复

使用道具 举报

29#
发表于 2009-6-26 11:09:21 | 只看该作者
We should find a way to sue the city and the Union.......


Did you find out it?
I do figure out a way for you: eat your ****!!!
回复

使用道具 举报

30#
发表于 2009-6-26 11:17:00 | 只看该作者

回复:让罢工者退休。

好啊,很多各行各业被累的工人顶上,培训几天就可以干了吧,尤其是收垃圾这种活
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表