• 实时天气:多伦多
    温度感觉: -4°
  • 实时天气:温哥华
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:卡加利
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 -3°
    温度感觉: -7°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯
    温度感觉:
查看: 1012|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

美旧金山市长斥卡弗蒂CNN应公开道歉

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-4-25 10:35:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

相关文章内容摘要

为抗议美国有线新闻网络CNN及其节目主持人卡弗蒂的辱华言论,旧金山侨界将于本周六举行声讨CNN的集会,而一向支持言论自由的旧金山市长纽森,4月23日也首度开口评论事件,严斥卡弗蒂的言论失误,侮辱在美华人,虽然 ... [ 查看全文 ]

§ 发表于 2008-4-25
新闻自由是民主的第一步

中美两国报纸等媒体的不同,从技术上来说,像中国实行通讯员投稿制度,由於不对自由来稿进行严格的事先事实核查,导致出现很多假新闻(有专门制造假新闻的个体户)。而美国的新闻报刊,基本不接受外稿,新闻由自己的记者采写,以保持负责任的、真实度更强的专业化报道。中国报纸等媒体的很多骨干是从基层的党委宣传部干事提拔上来的,而美国媒体的编辑记者,几乎都受过专业新闻训练,从地方报纸一点点做起,以新闻工作能力升迁。

新闻自由和定期选举是民主化的两个重要标
沙发
发表于 2008-4-25 11:00:10 | 只看该作者

回复:[评论]美旧金山市长斥卡弗蒂CNN应公开道歉

最初由[TianSheng]发布
[评论]美旧金山市长斥卡弗蒂CNN应公开道歉

新闻自由是民主的第一步

中美两国报纸等媒体的不同,从技术上来说,像中国实行通讯员投稿制度,由於不对自由来稿进行严格的事先事实核查,导致出现很多假新闻(有专门制造假新闻的个体户)。而美国的新闻报刊,基本不接受外稿,新闻由自己的记者采写,以保持负责任的、真实度更强的专业化报道。中国报纸等媒体的很多骨干是从基层的党委宣传部干事提拔上来的,而美国媒体的编辑记者,几乎都受过专业新闻训练,从地方报纸一点点做起,以新闻工作能力升迁。

新闻自由和定期选举是民主化的两个重要标
板凳
发表于 2008-4-25 12:25:09 | 只看该作者

法轮民运脏独肯定不喜欢这条新闻

地板
发表于 2008-4-25 12:30:03 | 只看该作者
卡弗蒂 is so low.
5#
发表于 2008-4-25 14:25:15 | 只看该作者

言论自由和公开侮辱华人是两回事

第一帖大谈特谈新闻和言论自由, 实际是毫无新意的老生长谈. CNN公开侮辱华人与新闻言论自由无任何关系, 不能用新闻言论自由自由为借口逃避责任. 在新闻言论最自由的国家, 侮辱人格也是不允许的.
6#
发表于 2008-4-25 18:35:16 | 只看该作者

Hi, What did you really want to say?

Dear Sir or Madam,
I have a couple of simple questions for you:
What did you really want to say? Do you have feeling - humanbeing's feeling? Didn't you feel any hurt by that dirty words from CNN? Or, as long as it is under the name of "freedom", they can make slander on you, your sisters, your brothers,and actually your blood? It is nothing to do with media freedom, but a typical racial discremination to the blood of a whole great nation.  Have you considered the consequence of such dirty words?  If the same voice were repeated through media, all Chinese people will lose our esteem, our freedom to live in the society we contribute to, including yours, if you are a true chinese.
We all know that nothing is absolute including the so called freedom of speech, which must be legal and can not be a excuse to damage others intendedly.  The fact tells us that CNN intended to damage all Chinese people, which can never be allowed in a lawful and democratic country.  CNN must pay to clean up the dirt created by it. CNN must be enforced by law to do so.  We get a chance to test the justice in a so called democratic country.  Let's we do what we can to support the lawsuit.
7#
发表于 2008-4-25 18:37:28 | 只看该作者

this is a response to the first topic

8#
发表于 2008-4-25 18:39:22 | 只看该作者

回复:Hi, What did you really want to say?

最初由[sisou]发布
Hi, What did you really want to say?

Dear Sir or Madam of the first topic,
I have a couple of simple questions for you:
What did you really want to say? Do you have feeling - humanbeing's feeling? Didn't you feel any hurt by that dirty words from CNN? Or, as long as it is under the name of "freedom", they can make slander on you, your sisters, your brothers,and actually your blood? It is nothing to do with media freedom, but a typical racial discremination to the blood of a whole great nation.  Have you considered the consequence of such dirty words?  If the same voice were repeated through media, all Chinese people will lose our esteem, our freedom to live in the society we contribute to, including yours, if you are a true chinese.
We all know that nothing is absolute including the so called freedom of speech, which must be legal and can not be a excuse to damage others intendedly.  The fact tells us that CNN intended to damage all Chinese people, which can never be allowed in a lawful and democratic country.  CNN must pay to clean up the dirt created by it. CNN must be enforced by law to do so.  We get a chance to test the justice in a so called democratic country.  Let's we do what we can to support the lawsuit.  This is to the first one.
9#
发表于 2008-4-26 00:05:58 | 只看该作者

回复:Hi, What did you really want to say?

最初由[sisou]发布
Hi, What did you really want to say?

Dear Sir or Madam,
I have a couple of simple questions for you:
What did you really want to say? Do you have feeling - humanbeing's feeling? Didn't you feel any hurt by that dirty words from CNN? Or, as long as it is under the name of "freedom", they can make slander on you, your sisters, your brothers,and actually your blood? It is nothing to do with media freedom, but a typical racial discremination to the blood of a whole great nation.  Have you considered the consequence of such dirty words?  If the same voice were repeated through media, all Chinese people will lose our esteem, our freedom to live in the society we contribute to, including yours, if you are a true chinese.
We all know that nothing is absolute including the so called freedom of speech, which must be legal and can not be a excuse to damage others intendedly.  The fact tells us that CNN intended to damage all Chinese people, which can never be allowed in a lawful and democratic country.  CNN must pay to clean up the dirt created by it. CNN must be enforced by law to do so.  We get a chance to test the justice in a so called democratic country.  Let's we do what we can to support the lawsuit.
他们早就不把自己当中国人看了,怎么会觉得受到伤害?
他们只有攻击中国的时候和被中国人痛骂的时候,才会冒充一下中国人。
中国人会在谈到自己的祖国的时候,用野蛮、不开化、没有廉耻来形容吗?
中国人会说自己的祖国对世界的文明没有任何贡献,中国人只是一群寄生虫吗 ?
可笑的是,一旦被中国人骂,他们反倒想起“本是同根生”来了。
10#
发表于 2008-4-26 00:13:59 | 只看该作者

回复:回复:Hi, What did you really want to say?

最初由[hhxxttxs]发布
回复:Hi, What did you really want to say?


他们早就不把自己当中国人看了,怎么会觉得受到伤害?
他们只有攻击中国的时候和被中国人痛骂的时候,才会冒充一下中国人。
中国人会在谈到自己的祖国的时候,用野蛮、不开化、没有廉耻来形容吗?
中国人会说自己的祖国对世界的文明没有任何贡献,中国人只是一群寄生虫吗 ?
可笑的是,一旦被中国人骂,他们反倒想起“本是同根生”来了。
他们不仅不是中国人了,连人都不是了。
11#
发表于 2008-4-26 00:24:53 | 只看该作者

要CNN道歉?就跟要美国对共产主义道歉一样,

滑稽可笑。

也跟要中国向旧中国的资本主义道歉一样可笑。
12#
发表于 2008-5-8 20:11:28 | 只看该作者

回复:法轮民运脏独肯定不喜欢这条新闻

最初由[steelecase]发布
法轮民运脏独肯定不喜欢这条新闻




他们在给大家设制一个思想误区,既新闻自由就是可以胡说八道,不别遵守新闻工作者的操守了! 要不然胡说八道的人必须道歉和私营公营怎么扯上关系呢?!
13#
发表于 2008-5-8 20:17:31 | 只看该作者

回复:言论自由和公开侮辱华人是两回事

最初由[倪先生]发布
言论自由和公开侮辱华人是两回事

第一帖大谈特谈新闻和言论自由, 实际是毫无新意的老生长谈. CNN公开侮辱华人与新闻言论自由无任何关系, 不能用新闻言论自由自由为借口逃避责任. 在新闻言论最自由的国家, 侮辱人格也是不允许的.


:thumbu:
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表