|
最初由[被封了]发布
Sedona,
I believe these two men were treated unfairly by the supervisor. The supervisor let them do more than others did. In your opinion, what is the best way to ask for a fair answer?
In their protest, the words “Canada is a civilization country?", "need a job to live” and "have right to work" are irrelevant, making no sense. The words "abusively treated at work" are the right issue for the protest. I think these two men should only focus on this matter- unfair treatment at work.
In workplace, for safety reason, you can say "no" to supervisor under law. Otherwise, if you said no, you could get trouble and the chance to get a justice is unlikely.
Whether they were treated unfairly is hard to say. They have worked there for like 3 days only. In law, given such a short period of time, they don't have a case to prove unfair treatment or anything.
I agree civilization, rights to work, Chinese and new immigrants are all irrelevant. I also agree except safety reasons, an employee cannot say no to instructions from a superior.
Regarding abusive treatment, that's even harder to prove. Such an allegation will become a lawsuit.
My advice is to argue the termination is departure from the normal termination process, which involves either a verbal or a written warning. On the spot termination occurs when the staff's behaviour will become "toxic" to the workplace. Unfortunately, these guys had a verbal altercation with their supervisor, which is toxic to the workplace.
In my humble opinion, they don't have a case. |
|