加拿大拟立法出售遭制裁的俄罗斯资产

APP用户__Q3flg7

呵呵呵，这就是所谓的西方民主国家。抢别人的东西还要说出一副冠冕堂皇的理由。无语

Frankie Xu

制裁的是支持普京侵略乌克兰的富人的财产。这是伸张正义呀。

Zhenzhon Lee

我摸了摸荷包，还好刚刚取的20刀票子还在，估计20分钟剪个发没问题了。

Zhenzhon Lee

怪不得瑞士银行二战后不久就将在犹太人存在里面金钱金银珠宝名画古董没收名曰无人认领！
tmd世界上有多少脏钱存在那里？！到时都是瑞士的。

看谁笑到最后

WuQingKe 发表于 2022-5-2 07:10
关键这"认定"不是单方面的吗？!被认定的一方有辩解的机会吗？不要告诉我不需要，那是法西斯行为! ...

你怎么确定没有申辩的机会了？ 看着吧， 会有很多人申辩滴。。。

看谁笑到最后

Wenge3.0 发表于 2022-5-2 08:17
支持加拿大！顺便提一下：鹅爹的野儿子好多啊！在这里疯狂吐槽，哈哈哈哈 ...

继承不到一毛钱的野儿子们， 哈哈哈哈。。。

WuQingKe

看谁笑到最后 发表于 2022-5-2 21:23
你怎么确定没有申辩的机会了？ 看着吧， 会有很多人申辩滴。。。

哦，拭目以待！程序正义是法制社会的基础！杀人犯都有辩护律师不是。

hsdfl4169861231

看来全世界都是打土豪，分田地。分完地主然后就是资本家，再然后是地富反坏右，三反五反，来个西方文化大革命，打到一切牛鬼神蛇，看谁能笑到最后？

harknesswoo

围剿俄罗斯政客人人都该支持

香日德

赶尽杀绝这不是逼俄罗斯仍原子弹吗？

唐炜臻

Should Gowlings Account be taxed given that they have drained my , (Weizhen Tang) account over the years purporting to represent the investors whom they don't know and whose investments accounts they don't know. Even the investors don't know that Gowlings represents them. Gowlings does not have any retainer letters from any investors. They cannot show in the dockets if they even have dockets, what if any work they have done. They cannot show any interview notes with any investor. Yet they have seized illegally to hundreds of thousands of my money. They ought to be taxed. They ought to be reported to the Law Society of Upper Canada, they ought to account to somebody. Most important they ought to return my money. Please write to them about this.

唐炜臻

加拿大的律师，律师行和法庭将借乌克兰的名义抢劫一大笔被冻结的资金，最后剩下的给乌克兰的寥寥无几。

唐炜臻

Mr. Tang,

First and foremost, as I have told you repeatedly, please do not contact any of the lawyers for the other parties directly. It is inappropriate and they will not respond to you. Adam has asked that I remind you not to correspond to him.

I want to address the points you raise in your email:

Gowling's accounts have been passed, so a court has approved their fees and disbursement. If the investors have an issue with the accounts, that is a matter for them. You already challenged their accounts.

You have to appreciate that much of the monies tGowling has used from the account was used to defend themselves from litigation you brought against them. This is perfectly reasonable, as they are entitled to reasonable costs incurred as a result of defending themselves in their position as Representative Counsel. You can't really argue that they wasted your money on litigation when you were responsible for the litigation in which your claims against them were found to be meritless.

The investors should have known that Gowling represents them. They could have easily found this out from the OSC if they wanted to know. There is nothing that requires Gowling to have retainer letters from the investors, as Gowling was appointed by the Court.

Gowling does have dockets and those dockets do show what work they have done. Gowling has not illegally seized your money, as the Court has approved their accounts and has permitted them to take the money to pay their accounts.  I assure you that reporting Gowling to the Law Society of Upper Canada will be a waste of time, as your complaint will be denied.

Please understand that, while I am trying to represent your legal interests as best I can, I still owe you a duty to "tell it like it is" and not to give you false hope or unrealistic expectations.

包豪斯

强盗销赃……