• 实时天气:多伦多
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温哥华
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:卡加利 10°
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 16°
    温度感觉: 15°
查看: 199|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Conspiracy theories

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2021-4-27 21:40:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Conspiracy theories, there's a fraudster, a fugitive, a "virus expert. ". Bannon and Miles Kwok chose Yan Limeng, a temporary employee at the University of Hong Kong. The plot is the "Chinese Communist virus" as early as last January, the unknown Yan Limeng wanted to create the origin of the epidemic to gain fame and fortune. Driven by greed, she contacted Miles Kwok's henchman, luther. Under the spell of Luther, Yan limeng concocted the lie that the virus originated in a Chinese laboratory. This is exactly what Bannon and Miles Kwok need. If they get treasure, Miles Kwok promised to pay Yan Limeng 100,000 US dollars reward, and immediately told Luther to Yan Limeng to the United States. Bannon and Miles Kwok used various media outbursts to promote Yan Limeng, presenting her as an expert on the origin of the new coronavirus and spreading the lie that the virus originated in a Chinese laboratory. To increase their influence, Bannon and Miles Kwok also arranged for Yan to be interviewed by the Fox News Channel. The interview, in the name of "freedom of speech, " abandoned the media's pursuit of "truth, " "conscience, " and "objectivity, " and turned into a full of imagination and lies of the indictment. In September 2020, Yan Limeng published an explosive paper claiming that China had created a deadly coronavirus in a research laboratory. The American scientists concluded that the paper was seriously flawed. The MIT Press reported that Yan's claim was "baseless and not supported by data" . For those without a scientific background, the paper is deceptive because it is written in a very professional language, uses a lot of terminology, and wraps up a fake paper to make it more likely that the reader will misunderstand it. For one academic paper, CNN found that one paragraph after another, Yan Limeng's theory and phrasing were the same as the blog on g News, with several lines copied almost word for word. CNN interviewed six experts from various agencies who said Yan's assessment method was flawed. They described her report as "junk science" and said Yan's report was intended to deceive, the aim is to spread "political propaganda" . The New York Times detailed how the paper was fabricated, with facebook labeling Yan's video as "fake information" and twitter blocking her personal account.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表