• 实时天气:多伦多 18°
    温度感觉: 17°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 15°
    温度感觉: 14°
  • 实时天气:卡加利
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 21°
    温度感觉: 20°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 14°
    温度感觉: 14°
楼主: seaweed
打印 上一主题 下一主题

假如你是外长,你会如何抨击那个记者?欢迎大家踊跃参加

楼主
发表于 2016-6-16 07:22:52 | 显示全部楼层
这种暗埋偏见假设的问题,必须介入反驳。我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dion, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?
回复

使用道具 举报

沙发
发表于 2016-6-17 12:55:49 | 显示全部楼层
seaweed 发表于 2016-6-17 00:36
她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the  ...

暗埋假设的问题,是西方法律界常用于撕破谎言的暗器。美国之所以在外交事务上启用很多法律出身的人,看中的就是法律人说话的严谨以及锋芒毕露。加拿大记者提问内容对中国极尽贬损诋毁(自己去找原文看),却又不是对中方发问,目的是想让中方吃个哑巴亏,用心险恶。从法律角度分析,如果王毅按照一般的外交流程不介入,肯定会被外界解读为默认,更会掀起外交波澜。所以,王毅介入并驳斥绝对是对的,只是措辞和态度上有商榷的余地。重贴律政混混的回答:我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" 至于陈先生,在这个人云亦云的浮华时代,为功利可以乔装打扮的时代,我对他表示尊敬: Salute, Mr. Chen!  -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
回复

使用道具 举报

板凳
发表于 2016-6-17 23:31:20 | 显示全部楼层
原来是找认同来了,008的发言不但是中文,而且是如假包换的新华社体,这样的文风如果能得到国际社会认同的话,今日中国的外交处境也不会是这样举步维艰了。 Anyway, who cares? 除了周总理对知识分子有由衷的尊敬和赏识,谁又不是唯我是用呢? 屠呦呦在获得诺贝尔奖认可之前,国内当权派谁不是把她往脚下踩呢? 我只管直抒心意。
-律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!


回复

使用道具 举报

地板
发表于 2016-6-18 08:20:53 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 justiceQC 于 2016-6-18 10:06 编辑

就算是宣传,也要有得可宣传,我愿意抛砖引玉,寻求新华社体外一种更好改变华人形象的外交新思维,干嘛不问问网友都什么意见呢?再有,个人攻击和幽人一默是有明显的区别的,而幽默是如何能在外交场合化干戈为玉帛并赢得更多尊重的道理不用赘述吧?其实问题的关键在于:周总理之后,有外交智慧、或者有伯乐胸襟的将才少之又少。 重贴我的回答:我要是王毅,我就要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
回复

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2016-6-18 11:00:11 | 显示全部楼层
装开明办一言堂的气量就不要拉虎皮、扛大旗, ok? 扣帽子也是一贯的伎俩,so what?!
还贴律政混混的回答:我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" 至于陈先生,在这个人云亦云的浮华时代,为功利可以乔装打扮的时代,我对他表示尊敬: Salute, Mr. Chen!  -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
回复

使用道具 举报

6#
发表于 2016-6-18 14:41:09 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 justiceQC 于 2016-6-18 14:43 编辑

外交部的修养作为,某些人是真诚还是伪善,老百姓心中自有一把尺,这件事就是一个很好的证明。 我不跟帖了,你们自嗨吧!
律政混混的回答:王毅遭遇到的是暗埋偏见假设的提问,必须介入反驳。我要是王毅,我还要抛一个问题给旁边的加拿大官员:“她妈妈知道她这么二吗?”He did the right thing! Question like that has to be objected because the presumption given therein is very biased. If I were him, I would have asked Mr. Dior, "Do you think her mother should question her IQ for being so incompetent?" 至于陈先生,在这个人云亦云的浮华时代,为功利可以乔装打扮的时代,我对他表示尊敬: Salute, Mr. Chen! -律政混混, IForYou, Tumblr blogger (English/Chinese) and 新浪博客博主?,《魁北克新公司法》中法英三语对照及麻辣诠释第一人!不依附于任何权贵的中国臭老九一名。吾心自有光明月,千古团圆水无缺!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表