TABLE OF CONTENTS
Open letter to the honorable Christopher Portner 5
The Commission, in making its decision, 6
1. failed to observe a principle of fundamental justice: 6
2. made an error of law: 6
3. breached or failed to apply an commission policy: 6
4. based its decision on erroneous or incomplete information and wrongful conviction: 6
5. acted without jurisdiction or beyond its jurisdiction, or failed to exercise its jurisdiction: 6
OSC failed to observe the principles of fundamental justice, made me lost name, business and house and money borrowed from TD bank and freedom and life and those of investors before trial and due process. 6
Many issues would be raised including whether 7
(4) the Court should weigh the evidence and draw its own conclusions because the OSC failed to properly assess credibility and came to conclusions which were not supported by the evidence. 7
(5) The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “ 7
(6) Staff use malicious conviction to get advantage for new allegation 7
OSC conducted an unusual search and seizure and malicious Prosecution 7
OSC also breached the constitution act and privacy act of my investors 7
OSC hearings lacked due process not only in my case, but also in many other cases, which need serious consideration and investigation, judicial competent review. 8
The court conduct and trial judge 8
Charter Enforcement and Remedies 8
Notice of Motion to Revoke Cease Trade Order 13
Background Introduction 18
Over 100 of investors signed a petition to OSC for Mr. Weizhen Tang to trade 19
Minutes of the OCF Investors’ Meeting of October 25, 2009 26
Weizhen Tang 25 reasons to stop the extension of OSC cease order admitted as trial evidence 30
Institutional Investors after my Public Real Time Demonstration 33
唐炜臻的投资人主动为唐炜臻找资金做交易和司法辩护 56
Investors were looking for fund for Mr. Weizhen Tang to trade and defence 56
Previous Letters from Investors after OSC charges 60
Letter One 61
Letter Two 63
Letter Three 64
Letter Four 65
Letter Six 66
Letter Eight 66
Letter Nine 67
投资人纷纷来信 68
投资人来信照登 1 69
投资人来信 2 69
投资人来信 3 70
投资人的信 4 70
唐炜臻回投资人来信 71
投资人来信（8）：如果你人出了问题一切雄心壮志都成空 71
投资人年来信照登 9 72
投资人来信照登 10 72
投资人来信 12 73
投资人来信 13 73
投资人来信 14 74
投资人来信 15 75
早期投资人见证书 76
Hong Xiao, the Victim Impacts of OSC and Crown in the article of Chinese News Group 86
“Weizhen Tang: my wife suffers because of OSC” 86
Issue with OSC and its Staff 88
ISSUES WITH OSC 91
Many issues were raised including whether: 91
1. OSC unreasonably freeze my trading account and cease my trading and stop my legal business and destroyed my defence in no time since march 18, 2009. 91
2. The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “ 91
3. There was a reasonable perception of bias and competent concerning the expert and incorrectly applied his own expertise to enhance the evidence; 91
4. The so-called senior investigator, Mr. Jeff Thomson, the questions are who is him and what background and expertise he has and what he believe or not believe cause me and damages to the case and investors. 91
5. Withholding evidence, there were 44 investors and interviews, only used those few witnesses against the accused, ignored the majority of supportive and positive evidence 91
6. Failed to apply proper standards in determining what constitute its quash-criminal charges and charge criminally 91
7. OSC abused my motion to lift Cease Trade order transcript from OSC Nov 13 2009 to find evidence against me, not to properly consider and make decision for my investors and business. 91
AN UNPLEASANT O.S.C. HEARING FOR WEIZHEN TANG and his clients 91
Court looks to release OSC frozen $200,000 personal funds to retain counsel on July 12, 2011 96
Transcript of Court proceedings to argue before Justice Nordheimer to release personal funds frozen by OSC to retain counsel August 15 , 2011 114
And when my (the judge) first inquiry at the pretrial of Mr. Tang is, “ do you intend to continue to represent yourself in these proceedings?” I am told immediately that he is desirous of having counsel with respect to this matter, 115
Transcript of Court proceedings of August 15, 2011 p. 13 116
Nordheimer J. Noticed that Mr. Tang’s right to use those funds to fulfill his constitutional rights to counsel and to make full answer and defence? 116
Body of law: Mareva injunctions 117
Transcript of Court proceedings to argue Rowbotham Application before Justice Nordheimer on September 23, 2011 118
Mr. Hutchison: one might ask that with respect to every single fraudster who walks in here and has legal aid. 118
Justice Nordheimer: They might. 118
Merits of the proposed appeal based on the supplemental record or supplemental arguments not before Rosenberg J.A. 119
Nordheimer J. erred in refusing to appoint counsel for the applicant pursuant to my R. v. Tang Rowbotham application; 119
The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “ 119
The trial judge erred in finding that this was an appropriate case for a fine in lieu of forfeiture given the purpose of such an Order (i.e. to deprive fraudster of their unlawful person gain). 119
My Ideas, Theory and Practice and Experience and Recount My Injustice: The Truth, Evidences and History, Fascinating Story and Recount Index 120
The Collapse of Lehman Brothers and induced 2008 global financial crisis and erosion of $10 trillion in market capitalization in Oct, 2008 121
OSC Massive Investigation and Gross Violation of Investors’ Right and Privacy and Attacking Chinese Investors by OSC Staff for months 124
OSC lead SEC to investigated Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership 124
SEC appointed Receivership and Seize and Stolen Fund from My Investors and Business 124
My Intention to have massive lawsuits against Media and OSC , the police and the crown for Defamation, Slander and Libel to stop them 124
SEC Interlocutory Judgment: “NO ADMISSION AND NO DENY”, SEC asked AND RUN AWAY 124
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership Meeting Minutes , dated October 25, 2009. 124
IMPORTANT COURT PROCEEDING AND TIMELINE INDEX 125
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2015-11-1 16:48:35
收藏
顶
踩
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
楼主