网友热议入籍准戴面纱：法官缺心眼吗？

blueskyshining

伊教妇女蒙面，不仅对其他人造成心理上的恐慌，而且真犯罪时，受害人连她的长相都无法说明白，只能吃亏了。
再说一说，伊教为何要求妇女蒙面蒙身？因为伊教认为，女人的头发、脸部和身体会让男人产生不好的性冲动甚至犯罪，所以为了减少男人的冲动，女人必把自己包起来，否则女人被强奸就是自找的，就是活该。

这就象是：如果你家的房屋比别人好、你买的车比别人贵，别人就可以合法地抢劫你，因为你用财富诱惑别人了，你被抢被杀，都是你罪有应得。
伊教的逻辑真是令人发指啊。
卡尔加里因为是石油城，而且西方首位民选的信奉伊斯兰教的市长，所以许多中东移民和其他国家的伊教移民都过来了。他们建立了伊教的学校，而且是高墙包围，与外界分开。卡城其他所有的学校都是开放式的，只有伊教的学校才是封闭的。伊教信徒走到哪里，哪里就会渐渐出现这种封闭、落后、令人恐慌的现象。

blueskyshining

在社会中，一个人蒙面与否，是关系着每一个人的安全。除了个别人脸上长了难看的东西蒙脸外，现实中蒙面蒙身的人有几个不是恐怖份子？好好的人为何要蒙面？

我坚持反对这种令人恐慌、落后的对妇女强迫洗脑的宗教行为。它不仅违犯了人类自由平等的人权，而且给社会带来的是恐慌。我到现在还记得，五年前，有一天晚上下班后买了菜，坐轻轨回家，车上人不多，我也昏昏欲睡，突然旁边有一声音向我说话，我一睁眼，却只看一张黑布蒙面蒙脸只剩眼睛的人，吓得我当时都没有说出话来。那种恐慌至今记忆犹新，历历在目。

我希望此生在加拿大，再不要有这种遭遇。

blueskyshining

克 飞 发表于 2015-10-7 12:31
那你到是说说女人为什么非得穿裤子或裙子呢?

你想怎么穿都可以，不穿衣服也可以，那是你的自由，但别妨碍公众。

blueskyshining

冬临城堡 发表于 2015-10-7 14:24
又开始满嘴扯蛋了。哈珀说的就是niqab，niqab就是罩袍！！
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politic ...

A niqab (/n??kɑ?b/; Arabic: ?????? niqāb?, "veil" also called a ruband) is a cloth that covers the face as a part of sartorial hijab. It is worn by some Muslim women in public areas and in front of non-mahram adult males。

这是wiki上的解释。它是覆盖脸部的罩袍。在加国，常见一些女性穿罩袍，但脸是露在外面的，除了一些伊教女人穿外，还有一些印度女性也可能这样穿，那是真正的传统，没有人会反对这种穿着。但要求盖住脸部的罩袍，只有伊教中的极端份子的传统中才有的。

看看下面一位伊教妇女写的文章：
As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in Public

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/raheel-raza/niqab-burka-ban-canada_b_8189112.html
As a Muslim mother who never saw a niqab when I was growing up in Karachi, Pakistan, I am astonished to see Canada's judiciary caving in to Islamists who have nothing but contempt for Canada's values of gender equality.

blueskyshining

看看下面一位伊教妇女写的文章：
As a Muslim, I Think Canada Should Ban the Niqab and Burka in Public

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/raheel-raza/niqab-burka-ban-canada_b_8189112.html
As a Muslim mother who never saw a niqab when I was growing up in Karachi, Pakistan, I am astonished to see Canada's judiciary caving in to Islamists who have nothing but contempt for Canada's values of gender equality.

I write this as a Muslim Canadian who does not have any specific political leanings.

But in the 25 years I have called Canada home, I have seen a steady rise of Muslim women being strangled in the pernicious black tent that is passed off to na?ve and guilt-ridden white, mainstream Canadians as an essential Islamic practice.

The niqab and burka have nothing to do with Islam.

They're the political flags of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, the Taliban, al-Qaida and Saudi Arabia.

Now I learn I have not only to fight the medieval, theocratic adherents of my faith for a safe space for myself, I have to battle the Federal Court of Canada as well, which has come out on the side of these face masks.

The ruling concerns the case of Zunera Ishaq, a 29-year-old woman who emigrated to Canada from Pakistan in 2008.

After previously showing her face to an immigration official in 2013 when taking her citizenship test, she refused to take part in the citizenship ceremony because she would have to show her face while taking the oath of citizenship.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government rightly banned face masks at such ceremonies, but this was found to be unlawful by the Federal Court.

With all due respect, let me introduce our Canadian judges to their Pakistani colleagues in the jihadi badlands of Peshawar.

In November 2004, the Chief Justice of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), Tariq Pervaiz Khan, ordered female lawyers not to wear face veils in courtrooms, saying they couldn't be identified, nor assist the court properly while wearing veils.

He scolded the niqabi women saying,"You are professionals."

Covering the face is not a religious requirement for Muslim women.

The injunction in the Qur'an is for modesty (for men and women).

Some Muslim women interpret this as covering their head with a scarf or chador.

A scholar of Islamic history, Prof. Mohammad Qadeer of Queen's University, Kingston, wrote in the Globe and Mail in March 2006:

"The argument about concealing one's face as a religious obligation, is contentious and is not backed by the evidence."

He added, "in Western societies, the niqab also is a symbol of distrust for fellow citizens and a statement of self-segregation. The wearer of a face veil is conveying: 'I am violated if you look at me.'"

It is a barrier in civic discourse. It also subverts public trust."

The federal Liberals and NDP are treating Canada's niqabis as latter-day Rosa Parks, fighting for justice.

This is vote-bank politics that is, as my friend and secular activist Tarek Fatah calls it, "sharia Bolshevism."

There is just one way forward: The next government must legislate the complete ban on wearing face masks in public, not just to expose the hypocrisy of the Islamists but for the sake of our security as well.

blueskyshining

在加国，常见一些女性穿罩袍，头部也是有围巾的，但脸是露在外面的，除了一些伊教女人穿外，还有一些印度女性也可能这样穿，那是真正的传统，没有人会反对这种穿着。

但要求盖住脸部的罩袍，只有伊教中的极端份子的传统中才有的，目的当然是他们认为女人不样穿就会诱惑男人。这种变态要求，和中国过去女小裹小脚是一样的，都是认为女人天生比男人差，不能和男人一样平等。

不过和中国过去的传统不同的是，伊教极端者认为女人的脸、身体和头发都可能诱惑男人犯罪，所以女人必须要遮住全身（若不是走路需要眼睛，恐怕眼也不能漏在外面了吧）；

而过去中国的男人认为女人裹了小脚后，不仅不能到处乱跑，只能待在家里伺候男人，而且因小脚无法稳定支撑身体，走路时会不停地摆动腰身会给男人带来视觉上的所谓享受，才会在中国历史上出现以摧残女性为快感的变态文化。

blueskyshining

所以，就算是根据伊教真正的传统，也没有要求女性只能穿着遮面只露眼的衣服，这只是一些伊教极端组织统治的地区才会出现的。

blueskyshining

somanysb 发表于 2015-11-12 12:55
宗教信仰习俗值得尊重，但是宗教绝对不应该政治化。
中东国家多疯狂就不多说了，有兴趣的人可以看看东正教 ...

是的。信仰应该只是个体的选择，它决不能凌驾于政治或者说法律之上。

blueskyshining

信仰应该只能是个体的选择，它决不能凌驾于政治或者说法律之上。

即使是基督教，在政教合一时，也是黑暗得可怕。任何民主自由的国家，都会将政治和宗教分离，让宗教只起安慰的作用。不管什么宗教，如果和政治捆绑在一起，对人民都是一种灾难。