新冠肺炎最早于2019年9月在意大利发现，而不是12月在中国

Walson_Lei

Published 2 days ago on November 18, 2020
By Eric Zuesse
From://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/11/18/covid-19-started-in-italy-in-september-2019-not-in-china-in-december/
正如迄今为止广泛报道的那样，covid-19或冠状病毒-19病毒疫情并不是于2019年12月在中国武汉开始。据意大利癌症研究协会的研究人员称，这种新病毒或“新”病毒最早在2019年9月之前感染了意大利人，并于11月11日由意大利国家肿瘤研究所作为最新研究发表。

这项研究的标题是“意大利大流行前期意外检测出SARS-CoV-2抗体”。它报告：

“在2019年9月至10月确定了首例阳性病例激增。对抗SARS-CoV-2功能性NAb的评估已在2019年10月收集的基于CPE的微中和测试中鉴定出阳性样品。由于感染和抗体合成之间存在时间延迟，这些结果表明，该病毒早在2020年2月检测到已申报的索引患者之前就已在意大利传播。此外，大多数首批抗体阳性的人大多生活在大流行开始的地区。”

换句话说：尽管第一个正式发现感染covid-19的意大利人是在2020年2月，但直到2019年9月，意大利已出现了感染covid-19的公民。因此，这是意大利成为疫情最早爆发三个国家之一的原因之一，最早在2020年2月1日确诊了covid-19病毒的国家（紧随中国和韩国之后），可能是中国和韩国是最早注意到这种新病毒的两个国家。 2020年1月31日，意大利暂停了往返中国的所有航班，并宣布进入紧急状态，但是2020年2月26日是意大利首次报告covid-19案的日期，而该日意大利已经有147起。意大利政府解释说，它突然停止了航班，说一对来自武汉的中国夫妇于1月23日抵达意大利，并于1月30日被确诊为新疾病。中国已经在一个月前（即2020年1月23日）开始报告案件：其中259起。此后两周内，中国领导人确立了全面封锁，并在全国范围内进行了深入搜查，以寻找他们先前未曾发现的病例；因此，在2月12日，中国的已知病例激增，当天有14108例报告。该数字在2月29日下降到每天573例新病例。在该日期之后，中国没有报告甚至接近该数字的病例数。

到2020年3月15日，即3月1日之后的两周，意大利的冠状病毒感染强度是当时世界上最高的，每百万居民中409.3例，中国每百万居民中56.2例。 （美国每百万人口中有11.1个。）然而，这个小国圣马力诺（San Marino）被意大利所包围，总共有109例，只有34,232人口（对于那个国家来说，这个国家太小了，无法被包括在内）正在计算）；因此，这就是百万分之三的百万分之三的感染率，实际上（当时）是当时（迄今为止）世界上最高的共生感染率。因此：第一个被该病毒感染的人很可能是圣玛丽娜，而不是意大利人。

随着有关该病毒的更多研究完成，该病毒的实际地理来源可能会变成任何国家/地区，因为国际旅行和旅游业现在很平常，而以前并非如此。也许2019年9月的意大利案件是外国游客而不是意大利人造成的。未来，全球大流行的可能性可能会比以前的历史要高得多，但是技术（例如疫苗）和世界都在调整，因此死于瘟疫的全球人口百分比可能不会比过去高。过去。根据最新的先前大流行（即1918-1920年的西班牙流感）做出预测可能并不完全合适。西班牙的流感很可能始于美国，而不是西班牙，但据维基百科说：“为保持士气，第一次世界大战的审查员将这些早期报道减至最少。报纸可以自由报道该流行病在西班牙中性地区的影响，例如阿方索十三世国王的严重病，这些故事给西班牙造成了一种错误的印象，认为西班牙受到的打击尤其严重。这引起了“西班牙”流感的名称。历史和流行病学数据不足以确定大流行的地理来源，并且对其位置也有不同看法。”换句话说，在任何时候，公众的信仰可以由政府及其报纸和广播机构来塑造，只要掩盖实际控制国家的人们不希望公众知道的事实即可。审查制度是专政的核心，几乎所有国家实际上都是专政，但是那里的新闻媒体审查了这一事实，而不是发表这一事实。因此，审查制度本身是对公众隐藏的.
Covid-19 Started in Italy, in September 2019, Not in China in December
The covid-19, or coronavirus-19, virus didn’t start in Wuhan China in December 2019, as has been widely reported till now. This new or “novel” virus was first infecting people in Italy, by no later than September 2019, according to researchers at the Italian Association for Cancer Research, and published on November 11th, as Current Research, by the National Tumors Institute of the Italian Ministry of Health.

This study is titled “Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the pre-pandemic period in Italy”. It reports that:

“The first surge of positive cases was identified in September-October 2019. Evaluation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 functional NAbs identified positive samples in CPE-based microneutralization tests already collected in October 2019. Given the temporal delay between infection and antibody synthesis, these results indicate that the virus circulated in Italy well before the detection of the declared index patient in February 2020. In addition, most of the first antibody-positive individuals lived in regions where the pandemic started.”

In other words: though the first officially noticed covid-19-infected Italians were in February 2020, there had been covid-19-infected people in Italy starting by no later than September 2019. Consequently, one reason why Italy was one of the three most covid-19-infected nations as early as 1 March 2020 (right behind China and South Korea), might be that China and South Korea were the first two countries that noticed this new virus. On 31 January 2020, Italy suspended all flights to and from China and declared a state of emergency, but 26 February 2020 was the first date when Italy reported covid-19 cases, and there were already 147 in Italy on that date. The Italian Government explained its sudden cessation of air-flights by saying that a Chinese couple from Wuhan had arrived in Italy on January 23rd and became diagnosed with the new disease on January 30th. China had started reporting cases already a month earlier, on 23 January 2020: 259 of them. Within two weeks thereafter, China’s leaders established total  lockdown and intensive nationwide searches to find possible cases that they had previously missed; so, on February 12th, there was an enormous spike in China’s known cases, 14,108 of them, reported on that date. That number declined down to 573 new daily cases on February 29th. No number even close to that number (573) has been reported after that date in China.

Two weeks after 1 March, on 15 March 2020, Italy had by far the world’s highest intensity of coronavirus infections as calculated at that time, at the rate of 409.3 cases per million residents, and China had 56.2 cases per million. (U.S. had 11.1 per million.) However, the tiny nation of San Marino, which is surrounded within Italy, had 109 total cases, and only 34,232 population (which was too small for that nation to have been included among the ones which were then being calculated); so, that’s a per-million rate of 3,184 infections per million, which was actually (and by far) the world’s highest rate of covid-infections, at that time. Consequently: the first person who became infected by this virus could well have been a San Marinan, instead of an Italian.

As more research is done, regarding this virus, the actual geographical source of it could turn out to be any country, because international travel and tourism are now commonplace, which was not formerly so. Maybe the Italian cases in September 2019 had resulted from a foreign visitor, instead of from an Italian. In the future, global pandemics will likely be far more frequent than in earlier history, but technology (such as vaccines) and the world adjusts so that there might not be a higher percentage of the global population dying from plagues than has been so in the past. Making predictions on the basis of the latest prior mega-pandemic, which was the Spanish flu of 1918-1920, might not be entirely appropriate. The Spanish flu most likely started in America, not in Spain, but, according to Wikipedia, “To maintain morale, World War I censors minimized these early reports. Newspapers were free to report the epidemic’s effects in neutral Spain, such as the grave illness of King Alfonso XIII, and these stories created a false impression of Spain as especially hard hit. This gave rise to the name ‘Spanish’ flu. Historical and epidemiological data are inadequate to identify with certainty the pandemic’s geographic origin, with varying views as to its location.” In other words, what the masses of the public believe at any given time can be shaped by the government and by its newspapers and broadcasters, simply by hiding facts that the people who actually control the country don’t want the public to know. Censorship is the core of dictatorship, and almost all countries are actually dictatorships, but the news-media there censor-out that fact, instead of publishing it. So, the reality of censorship is, itself, hidden from the public, in order for the people who control the government to control the masses so that the nation can be called a “democracy.” That’s important for them to do in order to minimize the percentage of the population they’ll need to imprison. However, the United States already has a higher percentage of its residents in prison than does any other country; and, so, its news-media are especially highly censored, in order to be able to prevent an outright revolution. Forcing both the body and the mind could turn out to be too much, but apparently the individuals who are in control feel they need to go that far, in order to remain in control.

But, regardless, any politician who calls covid-19 “the Wuhan virus” or “the China virus” is expressing that person’s agenda, instead of anything about reality, since the actual first case of this disease could have appeared anywhere.

(NOTE: The “gain-of-function” hypotheses, and evidence of Chinese bio-warfare research being funded by the Pentagon and participated in by Canada, do raise questions, which should be answered; but more basic than whether this virus was natural or instead man-made, is precisely where and how it first got released out into the public. We don’t yet really know the answer even to that extremely important question — a question which must be answered BEFORE one can even begin to address the question of whether that event was natural or instead military. This is the basic question, and its answer is still unknown. It’s the first question that must be answered before anything else can become known about how the global pandemic started.)