Sorry my Chinese input tools does not work any more, I will write in English to finish it:
Communism is better for the poor and week, but the poor and week won’t work hard in that system because they don’t have to. Capitalism is better for the rich and strong people, but the poor and week will be defeated. We need to seek a balance between the two, so everyone can have a good life.作者: 游夫 时间: 2005-11-17 08:04
该知足了.
人无完人,社会也一样.作者: 俺是来看戏的 时间: 2005-11-17 10:27 标题: 回复：人类的悲哀 最初由[spyspx]发布 人类的悲哀
看病不要钱，大家（病人和医生）就乱来。看病要钱，大家就抱怨不管穷人死活。
这个世界的问题是 – 在认识到弱者的毛病下，如何帮助弱者。
Sorry my Chinese input tools does not work any more, I will write in English to finish it:
Communism is better for the poor and week, but the poor and week won’t work hard in that system because they don’t have to. Capitalism is better for the rich and strong people, but the poor and week will be defeated. We need to seek a balance between the two, so everyone can have a good life. 说到点儿上了。作者: 宇宙洪荒 时间: 2005-11-17 12:14 标题: 谁能回答我？ 谁知道入籍以后再回国看病有什么说法吗？
多谢指教。作者: Horizon 时间: 2005-11-17 12:45 标题: 回复：人类的悲哀 最初由[spyspx]发布 人类的悲哀
看病不要钱，大家（病人和医生）就乱来。看病要钱，大家就抱怨不管穷人死活。
这个世界的问题是 – 在认识到弱者的毛病下，如何帮助弱者。
Sorry my Chinese input tools does not work any more, I will write in English to finish it:
Communism is better for the poor and week, but the poor and week won’t work hard in that system because they don’t have to. Capitalism is better for the rich and strong people, but the poor and week will be defeated. We need to seek a balance between the two, so everyone can have a good life.
Sorry my Chinese input tools does not work any more, I will write in English to finish it:
Communism is better for the poor and week, but the poor and week won’t work hard in that system because they don’t have to. Capitalism is better for the rich and strong people, but the poor and week will be defeated. We need to seek a balance between the two, so everyone can have a good life.作者: duoduo2003 时间: 2005-11-17 18:39 标题: 中国误诊的可能多一千倍. 只是没有新闻自由, 我们不知道罢了.作者: 爱小米粥的包子 时间: 2005-11-17 18:52
加拿大的医疗体系确实效率低下，可是，以下在中国发生的事情有没有可能在加拿大发生？
The comparative evidence is that the Canadian health care
model is inferior to others in place in the OECD. It produces
inferior access to physicians and technology, produces
longer waiting times, is less successful in preventing death
from preventable causes, and costs more than any of the
other systems that have comparable objectives, save the
programs in Iceland and Switzerland. The models that produce
superior results and cost less than Canada’s monopolistic,
single-insurer, single-provider system have user fees;
alternative, comprehensive, private insurance; and private
hospitals. Canada should follow the example of these superior
health care models.作者: 高楼林立 时间: 2005-11-17 21:17 标题: 好坏都是相对的 和中国比，加拿大医疗确实很好。没钱没权，在中国就别治病。西欧和美国的医疗可能更好，我们去不了，讨论也没什么意义。作者: Horizon 时间: 2005-11-17 22:01 标题: 你真不知足． 我们正享有加拿大富人同等的权利去享受这个免费的医疗系统，那些百万富翁， 亿万富翁完全有能力享受更好的服务，但在加拿大却与你一样在等待， 请问你抱怨啥？？？
难道你在中国的权力比这好么？ 你有能力与官员比么？你有能力与富人比么？之所以你在这的感觉不如中国好， 那是因为你在这的相对地位不如在中国．相对那八亿多的农民， 你是城里人， 你是上等人．但这一切均为你自己的选择来加拿大．如果担心这里医疗不够好， ＪＵＳＴ ＤＯ ＩＴ． 多工作， 多交税，多参与去改进．作者: 落矶山人 时间: 2005-11-17 23:12 标题: 回复：好坏都是相对的 最初由[高楼林立]发布 好坏都是相对的
