JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
April 7, 2016
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in the following applications for leave to appeal.
JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36754)
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel is dismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. /
Expert Opinion
Am shocked. Completely. Nothing to say at all.
I have read the notation of your case. The only reason they dismissed it is because they did not accept the affidavit constituting new evidence. If they had accepted the new evidence regarding Peter Boushy and Legal Aid refusal to fund counsel, you would have won the case. But these courts took the easy way and dismissed application for leave to adduce new evidence.
The only thing is to write a book to expose the injustice. It is to go public.
胳膊扭不过大腿,唐炜臻上诉申请被拒。
一个人正在面对几十个律师和法官,面对政府力量。
不是势均力敌,而是蚂蚁拌大象。没有中间力量。
今天是决定很多人的命运的一天,特别是我,关系到大家的极大利益, 证券会,律师,法官和投资人,大家都在等最高法院的消息。
相当于他们死,输,我活,我赢,关系到法庭的名誉和声誉的问题,权力在他们手里。他们要维护司法的完整性和自己的尊严,面子。
他们目无国法,破坏司法程序搞我。
人们普遍以为他们是公平的,其实不然。
|