本帖最后由 唐炜臻 于 2016-1-6 09:07 编辑
1月8号个个要东西，最高法院要检控官，证券会要我给名单，民事法庭要我交文件。我一个人要做很多人做的事，面对几十个律师。看看你有什么兴趣，能做什么
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership et al. v. Tom Tong et al. (Court File No. CV-14-495752) - 30-day status update
Hello Ms. Chen,
This is a 30-day status update for motions in three actions that are scheduled to be heard together on January 19 and 20, 2016. The three actions are CV-13-492999, CV-13-490839 and CV-14-495752. I act for the defendants Bennett Jones LLP, Lincoln Caylor, Michael Paris, Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP and James H. Grout in CV-14-495752. I have copied the plaintiff in all three actions, Mr. Weizhen Tang, and all of the defence counsel. I have attached Justice Firestone’s August 21, 2015 scheduling endorsement.
Nothing has happened that would suggest that we are not proceeding on January 19 and 20, 2015. It is our expectation that the motions will proceed as scheduled.
Please note that as a result of allegations in the statements of claim, it may not be appropriate for certain judges to hear these motions: in Toronto, Justices Marrocco, Nordheimer and O’Marra; and outside Toronto, Justices Skarica, Gray and Miller.
Lucas Lung
Mr. Tang On behalf of Legal Aid Ontario, I can advise that we do not intend to adjourn the motion to strike scheduled in the Superior Court of Justice, for January 19 and 20, 2016. Criminal appeals and Civil Actions are very different legal issues. Your claim against Legal Aid Ontario is that we did not issue you a certificate to defend the criminal charges. A SCC appeal to set aside your conviction will not alter the fact that there is no basis for a claim against Legal Aid Ontario. Yours truly J. Stanley Jenkins Legal Counsel – Legal Aid Ontario
Mr. Tang, My clients are not prepared at this time to consent to a further stay of the proceedings. Please confirm whether you will be opposing the motion by the Toronto Police defendants and/or seeking an adjournment of the motion. If I don’t hear from you by January 8, I will assume that you will be opposing the motion and seeking an adjournment. Fred Fischer City of Toronto Legal Services Mr. Tang, My clients will not consent to a further stay of the proceedings or an adjournment of their motion, which is scheduled to be heard with the motions in the other actions onJanuary 19 and 20. You have had almost two years to prepare for these motions. You raised no issue regarding the timing when the motions were scheduled in August. We will oppose any request for an adjournment. If you intend to seek an adjournment, then you should obtain an urgent attendance in Civil Practice Court so you can make the request well before the hearing on January 19. If you take no steps by January 8 to obtain an attendance in Civil Practice Court, we will assume that you will be proceeding on January 19. If you then appear on January 19 and request an adjournment, we will take the position that the request should be denied because you had an opportunity to request an adjournment prior to the hearing but chose not to do so. If you want to request an urgent attendance in Civil Practice Court, you should send an email to Michelle Chen, the motions coordinator, at [email protected] and copy the rest of us. Lucas
Mr Tang: On behalf of the Ontario Securities Commission we take the same position.? We will also be opposing any request for adjournment.
Yours truly,
Freya Kristjanson
Counsel to the Ontario Securities Commission
Hello Ms. Chen, There are multiple motions in three actions that are scheduled to be heard on January 19 and 20, 2016. Defence counsel have advised Mr. Tang that any request to adjourn the motions will be opposed. We informed Mr. Tang that any request for an adjournment should be made in Civil Practice Court prior to the January 19 and 20 hearing dates. Defence counsel believed that this would be preferable to arguing a contested adjournment on the morning ofJanuary 19. We request an urgent attendance in Civil Practice Court so Mr. Tang’s adjournment request can be dealt with prior to the scheduled hearing dates. I will take any day you can squeeze us in between now and January 13. Thank you, Lucas
I was working on my application for leave to appeal to the Supreme court of Canada and I did not to file any documents yet and I would like to ask for adjournment and continue to stay until the criminal appeal run its course in Supreme court of Canada and I will expect a response from the crown office on January 8, 2016.
I will be seeking an adjournment or stay until the issues are resolved by the Supreme Court of Canada as everything is frosted and stems from the criminal charges and conviction. Without the criminal charge and conviction, all these issues would not be there. band I was charged because of the OSC who also froze my accounts which disabled you from engaging counsel and legal Aid did not fund my defence. Please do not prepare for the Motion as they will be incurring needless costs since I will be seeking and adjournment.
| 
狗仔卡
发表于 2016-1-6 09:02:50
收藏
顶
踩
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
楼主
发表于 2016-1-6 11:06:56