到底是鸡生蛋，还是蛋生鸡？

sillymouse

A：你信上帝吗？
B：当然，圣经告诉我们，上帝创造了万物，是天父。他的儿子用自己的血替人类赎罪。。。所以我当然相信上帝。

A：你相信圣经里说的都是真的？
B：当然，上帝创造了万物，是我们的天父。他的儿子用自己的血替人类赎罪。。。我们有什么理由不相信他呢？你相信上帝，当然就会相信圣经里的话。

sillymouse

选一个做时事版的LOGO你看怎样？
落日浮云 发表于 2014-4-7 11:31

很好的主意！！在这个板块里，无论政治问题，宗教问题，还是对时事的看法，所有持不同观点的群体间，似乎都象是鸡同鸭讲！哈哈很形象，请版主考虑。

那副国画的就很好啊。

superca

看谁那么厉害！

纸纱窗

回复 36# sillymouse


    不过以你目前的状况，照TOMM 兄，有段距离哦，他对真理的理解，略微深一点....

   但有一点，你哥们是共通：
  上帝灵魂深处，需要上帝； 上帝在造你们的时候，也把心尖留个窝，只有装进去对神的信仰，你们才有满足的心，否则————两位有思考、为人也良善聪明的哥们：

你们的人生，将永远在不能停止（对真理的求索），又不能到达中，流浪！！

纸纱窗

鸡同鸭讲，很形象啊！
sillymouse 发表于 2014-4-7 11:19 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

鸡同鸭讲？
   
正确，并 加一句：

物以类聚，惺惺相惜

宇宙洪荒

鸡同鸭讲，很形象啊！
sillymouse 发表于 2014-4-7 11:19 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

    选一个做时事版的LOGO你看怎样？

sillymouse

落日浮云 发表于 2014-4-4 12:37

鸡同鸭讲，很形象啊！

宇宙洪荒

宇宙洪荒

宇宙洪荒

weinberger

Yes. But both ducks and chickens like to talk to those in-between animals which have not decided whether they want to become chickens and ducks. They both try hard to recruit new members to join their teams. And by doing so, chickens and ducks always run into each other.

鸡，不要同鸭讲；
鸭，也不要同鸡讲，
鸡和鸭，都请对各自的客户讲。
大家发财！
落日浮云 发表于 2014-4-4 12:24

宇宙洪荒

鸡，不要同鸭讲；
鸭，也不要同鸡讲，
鸡和鸭，都请对各自的客户讲。
大家发财！

费事傾

The Bible was written by several different people for the same historical events, so Christians often use messages written by one of them to prove another's. If you don't believe Bible is true, then it's the end of story, Christians can't prove anything to you because the Bible is all they have. To be able to at least have a discussion, you have to assume the Bible is true to begin with, then later on if you have enough reasons to believe things written in Bible are absurd, you can walk away from it.
weinberger 发表于 2014-4-3 21:58

"Christians can't prove anything to you because the Bible is all they have. "

You are honest! That's why they have to rely on cursing when they cannot prove what they say is true. And also, they have to intimidate those who refuse to buy their lies.

SUPERFAN

很多邪教也是用你的方法忽悠人的。意志力弱的会被催眠，一个相信上帝的疯子的破坏力是惊人的。

The Bible was written by several different people for the same historical events, so Christians often use messages written by one of them to prove another's. If you don't believe Bible is true, then it's the end of story, Christians can't prove anything to you because the Bible is all they have. To be able to at least have a discussion, you have to assume the Bible is true to begin with, then later on if you have enough reasons to believe things written in Bible are absurd, you can walk away from it.
weinberger 发表于 2014-4-3 21:58 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

weinberger

The Bible was written by several different people for the same historical events, so Christians often use messages written by one of them to prove another's. If you don't believe Bible is true, then it's the end of story, Christians can't prove anything to you because the Bible is all they have. To be able to at least have a discussion, you have to assume the Bible is true to begin with, then later on if you have enough reasons to believe things written in Bible are absurd, you can walk away from it.

你说对了一半，我不是想要说真假的问题，我要指出的是，基督徒在传教的时，向其他人证明自己观点的方法是很没有逻辑的。拿一本书里的结论A证明同一本书结论B正确，不断用同样方法用同一本书里的不同结论互相证明，以此为依据，证明整本书的观点正确。你不觉得这种认知的过程很荒谬吗？
sillymouse 发表于 2014-4-2 21:48