• 实时天气:多伦多
    温度感觉: -1°
  • 实时天气:温哥华
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:卡加利
    温度感觉:
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔
    温度感觉: -3°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯
    温度感觉:
查看: 395|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

特斯拉关闭所有多伦多门店 19年新款只卖4万刀

跳转到指定楼层
推荐
发表于 2019-3-5 14:25:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

相关文章内容摘要

这两天的消息, 都被 特斯拉 刷屏了! 加拿大特斯拉宣布: 将在短期内 关闭所有多伦多门店! 多款车型大幅度降价! 新款SUV Model Y 将在3.14发售! 我们先来一件事一件事说... 为了降低成本,特斯拉宣布将 关闭所 ... [ 查看全文 ]

§ 发表于 2019-3-4
电动车现在的价格本身就偏高。
沙发
发表于 2019-3-9 08:23:25 来自客户端 | 只看该作者
只能说出了低端型号,不能说降价了,加拿大适用的四驱型号还是很贵,而且列出的价格有欺骗性,居然是扣除了省下的汽油费的价格,这个在提车时还是要付给特斯拉的,只是说之后不用加油了。
回复

使用道具 举报

板凳
发表于 2019-3-9 22:01:35 | 只看该作者
任何电动车我是不考虑的。目前电动车是等同烧煤的,而且处理巨量废旧电池环保代价极大。比起内燃机来,电动车就是一个谎言,何况还贵,用起来方便程度差得还很远。

不插电的油电混合好很多,但是电池处理还是不完美。
回复

使用道具 举报

地板
发表于 2019-3-9 22:10:55 | 只看该作者
The Electric Car Fraud: CLIMATE and ENERGY

The world is not ready for electric cars. Yet billions of taxpayer dollars have been squandered by our government on ‘green’ projects. Some feel that conversion to electric would be an advancement. It would not. Billions of dollars have been spent developing two types of extremely expensive electric cars; electric only and hybrids. The latter have a small gasoline engine to charge the battery. In both types, their $2,500 batteries have to be replaced every two years. Their four hour charging time is much too long for refilling at service stations. A massive infrastructure of grids and power stations would have to be built. The major problems with these cars and infrastructure are explained in this book. Hybrid cars are designed to run on both electricity and gasoline. Electric ‘only’ cars have no backup electric generators. The majority of the problems encountered lie in the support equipment and climate. The problems with the car themselves are listed in the book. The term ‘global warming” was hastily changed to “climate change” when it was discovered that the earth was not really getting warmer. Proponents of global warming claim that CO2 (carbon di-oxide) forms a layer in the stratosphere which reflects heat rays from the earth downwards thereby creating a greenhouse and raising the temperature of the earth. There is absolutely no practical reason for believing that this actually happens. But this is the reason given by environmentalists for eliminating CO2 But this theory collapses like a house of cards when it is put to the test of reality. Air and CO2 are miscible gases (which means they dissolve into one another) forming one homogeneous gas. Thus there can be no layer of carbon di-oxide in the stratosphere (neither man made nor naturally occurring) which is the mainstay of that warming theory. Reflection cannot occur within a homogenous. No layer – no reflection. No reflection – no greenhouse. No greenhouse – no global warming or climate change. There can be no argument. Yet billions of taxpayer dollars have been spent picking winners and losers (as of now, all losers). So there is no point in making equipment that does not exude CO2 because CO2 is not a problem in the first place. CO2 is an inert gas. Humans exhale it when breathing. To make the ‘culprit’ more tangible they refer to it as ‘carbon’. “Carbon emission” appears so much more threatening than “CO2 emission”. The chapter on “CLIMATE CHANGE” deals with this subject exhaustively. It takes the reader step by logical step in layman’s terms to the only possible conclusion; even if the climate is changing, it is not carbon dioxide that can possibly be the culprit. The power required to drive all the electric cars has to come from somewhere. ALTERNATE SOURCES OF ENERGY, other than NUCLEAR, have insurmountable limitations on continuity of supply and all are more expensive than gasoline. They cannot be used as primary generators. For instance, SOLAR units do not work in the dark or on cloudy days, WINDMILLS do not work in still weather and WATERFALLS freeze in winter in some geographical areas. Details of their advantage and shortcomings are included in this book.
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表