安省回归20年前性教育 很多人坐不住了

xdk001

dalien 发表于 2018-7-14 08:19
科学技术日新月异，你的性别也一天一个样？你现在是男是女？出来溜溜给大家看一眼以示服众 ...

你怎么不让孔夫子来教你，男女授受不亲？是不是你家里女人都大门不卖，二门不出？

xdk001

为什么总有些人智商那么弱，提到电脑说明的是现在还在通过电脑得到的信息远多于过去，那么性教育就要根据信息社会的现实调整，和电脑技术有毛关系啊？明明人家说的是孩子可以通过电脑得到的性知识好不好？难怪爆粉尽说些傻X话

约克鹿

有些网友对家长们为何反对新性教大纲不太理解，以下是家长们反对的部分主要理由：

为何对对不负责的新性教大纲说不？

1、对过早和不当向儿童引入性观念说不！
   各种概念如 4 年级 P141 “超越朋友的关係”“出去约会”（这部分指引涉嫌违法）、5 年级 P157 性行为“阴茎进入阴道”、6年级 P175 “手淫是正常，愉悦的”、7 年级 P196 引入“肛交，口交”概念、8 年级 P216 性别的流动性“变性人，双性恋”，这些是孩子生理和心理都无法理解的。

2、对不完整和修剪过的信息说不！
  （1）7 年级 P197 介绍艾滋病“经过治疗可以有正常人的寿命”，却不提病患依然有高传染性，和高死亡率。
  （2）1 年级 P93 要求“指出阴部各器官”，却不告诉孩子别人不可以碰，暴露他们于性罪犯的侵害下。
  （3）未能警告儿童性行为的法律风险，比如《刑事法》151、152 条：16 岁以下的性行为属于非法；《刑事法》159 条：18 岁以下的肛交行为属于非法。

3、对没有道德指引说不！
  （1）完全忽略生育，婚姻，家庭，责任与性行为的关係。止步于性行为中对身体的保护：七年级：P196
“如果你考虑发生性行为，你会如何保护自己？”八年级：P216 “如果你选择发生性行为前咨询医生，
你会更倾向于使用避孕套”
  （2）提供过多空间给教师，使他们可以灌输也许与儿童家庭文化习俗相悖的性教育。

4、对不尊重多元文化说不！
  3 年级 P124 要求学生接受和尊重“双母或双父家庭”，却不尊重学生自己的家庭文化习俗。

5、对未经充分咨询说不！
  同一份大纲曾经在 2010 年在公众压力下被中止，而 2015 年未经充分咨询公众就再次强制实施。

6、对儿童色情罪犯 Ben Levin 监督下拟就的性教育说不！
  此教纲为前代理教育厅长 Ben Levin 在任期间编撰，他被控多项儿童色情罪名并已认罪。

约克鹿

这是The Well Informed Parent的【性教大纲建议修改版】关心性教育大纲的父母们和朋友们可以多做针对性的讨论。
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a ... jUxNTkwM2VmYjhkYjc4


比如：
Specific Expectation:
教学期望
P. 141 - C1.3 Teacher prompt: “In cases of abuse, it is not uncommon for the person
being abused to know the person who is abusing them. If a friend told you that she had
a secret and that she was being abused, how could you help?”
Student: “I would tell my friend to ask an adult that she trusts so that she can get help. I
would listen and be there to support my friend.”
P. 141 - C1.3 教师提示:“在虐待的情形中,被虐待人认识或知道虐待人并非罕见
如果一位朋友告诉你,她有个秘密,她被虐待,你怎样可能帮助她?”
学生:“我会告诉我的朋友去询问她所信任的一位成人以便获得帮助。我会倾听并
在那儿支持我的朋友。”

Proposed Expectation:
建议期望
C1.3 Teacher prompt: “In cases of abuse, it is not uncommon for the person being
abused to know the person who is abusing them. If a friend told you that she had a
secret and that she was being abused, how could you help?”
Student: “I would tell my friend to talk to her parents and the teacher so that she can
get help. I would listen and be there to support my friend.”
 P. 141 - C1.3 教师提示:“在虐待的情形中,被虐待人认识或知道虐待人并非罕见。
如果一位朋友告诉你,她有个秘密,她被虐待,你怎样可能帮助她?”
学生:“我会告诉我的朋友去告诉她的父母和老师以便获得帮助。我会倾听并在那
儿支持我的朋友。”

约克鹿

大纲之下的意识形态与父母的权益

Every school, and every curriculum, has an underlying belief system, and imparts knowledge from a particular set of assumptions, or worldview. Collecting taxes from citizens who adhere to a wide range of different world views, and only returning the money to parents for education if those parents agree to have their children educated in the way chosen by the state, is quasi-totalitarian.When politicians and bureaucrats use the education system as a tool to impose their own moral beliefs on every child through a “one-size-fits-all” curriculum, they threaten Canada’s free society.

Whether Premier Wynne’s curriculum is good for children is not something that parents will ever agree on. That is exactly why, in Canada’s still-free society, parents should have the right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children. There is no reason for education funding to be limited to only one curriculum, and only one kind of school.

来源：National Post

http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/03/09/john-carpay-imposing-moral-beliefs-on-children-through-a-one-size-fits-all-curriculum/