|
发表于 2005-6-2 19:49:32
|
显示全部楼层
回复:当然有本质区别
最初由[南山秀才]发布
当然有本质区别
当然有本质的区别,要不,何必修改婚姻的定义呢?修改的目的,无非是扩大婚姻的定义,让婚姻把同性恋也囊括进去。这就说明婚姻的范畴被扩大了一倍。
婚姻(传统的婚姻),不但是爱情的誓约,更重要的是一种法律性、道德性的契约;不光是夫妻双方个人的契约,也是一种对社会稳定、种族繁衍具有重大作用的契约。从这一点来看,传统异性婚姻至少具有三大功用: 1、宣示两个人感情结合,且得到律法、道德的认可; 2、组建家庭,构成社会基本单元,有利于社会的稳定; 3、阴阳结合,生儿育女,繁衍后代。
比较之下可以肯定的是: 同性婚姻至少失去了异性婚姻三分之一的功用。这是起码的本质区别。
时代已经变迁,你所说的第三条即便是异性婚姻也站不住脚了。现今的异性男女,可以不结婚而生产后代,结了婚也可以不生产后代,生了后代也可以不养,养了也不一定可以令他们幸福。
找到以前的一篇文章,描述一个人如何从反对同性婚姻到支持同性婚姻的心理变化过程:
After consider and re-consider the issue for such a long time, I am now fully support 同性恋婚姻合法化.
<本文发表于: 相约加拿大:枫下论坛 www.rolia.net/forum >
Marriage has been supposed to be between a man and a woman.
Marriage has been supposed to be between a loved couple.
Marriage has been supposed to give rise of child/children.
Marriage has been supposed to stay until the love is broken; many people believe a love within a marriage should never break.
A married person has been supposed to be loyal to his/her spouse and take the spouse as a sex partner only.
However, all these are not always feasible today.
People devorce, no matter they still love each other or not; people have children before getting married or after devorce; people get married because they have the need of such a marriage, even they don't love each other. People screw around regardless of the marriage.
Now here are two men or two women, who love each other deeply from the bottom of their hearts. They live together the same way as a husband and a wife do. They make love;; they share their happiness and tears; they even quarrel. In addition, they enjoy the same financial benefits that other people get.
They are exactly the same as me and my wife. They love each other and their kids as we do. Only a little bit different way of they sex behaviour.
What's so wrong with that?
They have all the characteristics that a marriage should have. They just need a name, a legal name.
Give them the name. It is not for mercy. It is not for sympathy. Just make it fair. Stop thinking they are abnormal. Stop saying they should not have what you have.
They deserve a name of legal marriage just like you. |
|