|
Why Your Home Is Not the Investment You Think It Is 为什么你的房子不是你所想象的投资
请看今日本文的片段:
。。。。。
Q: But it's certainly better to buy a house than to pay rent.
A: That depends on when you buy, and how long you own. Buy at the wrong time -- like during the kind of buying frenzy that much of the country has just experienced -- and you could well end up wishing you had rented instead.
Boom market or bust, home buying has so many extra costs -- from upfront "points" paid to a lender to title insurance and appraisal fees -- that over the first five to seven years, a renter who invests the equivalent of a down payment in stocks could easily do better overall than a house buyer. Compounding that problem: Most homeowners move within seven years.
As the ownership timeline stretches out to 15, 20 or 30 years, however, the buyer will almost certainly do better than the renter, especially given the tax benefits of paying mortgage interest over traditional rent and the big rebate when the owner finally sells.
But the typical buy vs. rent argument clouds the more important point: A house is an inefficient way of building wealth.
。。。。。
详见今日:
by David Crook
Thursday, March 15, 2007
provided by http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/fi/gr/partner_logos/wsj_170x33_logo.gif
http://finance.yahoo.com/real-es ... ent-you-think-it-is
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/fi/10/90/95.gif |
|