如何挽救“华人巴菲特“名誉和地位行动为自己和集体谋...

唐炜臻

挽救“华人巴菲特“名誉和地位行动为大家服务，属于公义和公正，不是圈钱。有比较才有鉴别，研究唐炜臻可以维护华人形象，尊严和权利。

Help me support the 'Donations could  Save the ChineseWarren Buffett' fundraiser on Generosity

朋友们，你们好！

Hi there,

我现在需要你们的支持和帮助，捐款挽救“华人巴菲特”。

I'm reaching out to ask for your support for the"Donations could  Save the Chinese Warren Buffett" fundraiser onGenerosity.

唐炜臻想说, 投资人的损失不是唐炜臻造成的，我是金融市场大规模欺诈的受害者之一，主要是金融市场危机和政府的人为干预造成的，有投资人告我不一定有罪，重大刑事案件，没有律师进行审判是违法的，我的刑事和案例不是个人，家庭,朋友的事,是集体，社会和海外华人在海外普遍面临的荣辱和生存大计。

我跟你们一样从不犯罪，我只是很出名，出了头，枪打出头鸟就被定了罪。

在海外华人人人都一样，不管是有名还是有钱，有价值，有用都可能被律师和法庭非法抢劫。加拿大很多人被政府强大的执法人员用法律手段抢劫，强奸。

加拿大非常文明，而且很可怕，他们要你的名和钱，不要我们的命，温水煮蛤蟆不觉得。

我呼吁社会和国际社会的关注,调查研究和干预这种事件，维护司法的公正和尊严，我需要有组织,进行司法战争。

唐炜臻到最高法院的上诉成功可能使成千上万人无罪释放，家庭幸福，导致纳税人减税，使更多的人避免进监狱，天灾人祸。

唐炜臻因祸得福走向世界。唐炜臻得到了一座金山，需要资金支持和大家的支持，共同来搬家，对唐炜臻的支持很重要，是给自己一个机会。

有几个方式可以帮忙：

There are a few ways to help:

第一，捐款，有五个级别，1块，50块，500块和1000块不等，无论你捐多少是个意思，你们的捐款行动将会产生很大的，及其深远的影响。

1.      Donate - Everything helps. Even small donationshave a big impact.

第二，通过你们的网络，微信，微博，QQ，电子邮件等广泛传播，告诉每一个接触的人捐款

2.      Post to Facebook - The more people who hearabout us, the more likely we are to meet our target.

第三，举办筹款活动，到社区活动，告诉你们的朋友，同事和活动把消息传播出去

3.      Share with your community - Call your friends,tell your co-workers, make an announcement at your organization's event tospread the word.

第四．捐款平台为这次捐款提供免费服务，也可以直接跟唐炜臻联系，国内的朋友可以用红包。

Generosity has zero platform fees, so your donation goesfarther to help us reach our goal.

谢谢你们！

Thank you!

唐炜臻

Rowbotham – The Road to Acquittal
May 12, 2015
Criminal charges can have a devastating impact on anyone’s life. There is a lot at stake. Your liberty, for one. But also your livelihood, your relationships, and your personal integrity. Hiring a criminal defence lawyer to represent you is fundamental to your defence, and often the only way to mitigate the damage before it is done.
But there is a cost.
Lawyers are expensive, and for good reason. Litigation is costly, lengthy and time consuming. Individuals who cannot afford to pay a lawyer often apply for state-funded assistance through Legal Aid Ontario. But in order to do so, you have to meet a strict eligibility test.
The criteria to qualify for Legal Aid Ontario’s certificate program are harsh. A single individual will not be eligible for publicly funded representation if they earn more than $12,135 per year. For families of two, the cut-off is $20,993. The eligibility threshold maxes out at $30,016 for families of five or more. These figures fall well-below the low-income cut-offs established by Statistics Canada.
Let’s put that in simple terms – unless you live in poverty, you will not get a lawyer. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms speaks of access to counsel – a right that is effectively denied to the poor and middle-class.
Access to justice, deemed “abysmal” in Canada, is unashamedly being denied to individuals because they own property or have a modest income. The working class is most at risk. People who make too little but not enough are left to fend for themselves, at a time when we’re told by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada that access to justice is the most pressing challenge facing the administration of justice.
There is one option of last resort to obtain counsel and preserve your right to a fair trial.
A Robowtham application is an solution for those who don’t qualify for legal aid and still can’t afford to pay legal fees out of pocket. In other words – most middle class people. It’s based on the premise that all accused persons have a right to a fair trial. This right is deeply entrenched within our constitution, as reflected in sections 7, 10(b) and 11(d) of the Charter.
If a judge decides that an accused person can’t afford to hire a lawyer and that a lawyer is essential to a fair trial, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Rowbotham insisted that proceedings may be stayed (suspended) under s. 24(1) of the Charter until such time as funding is provided. In other words, if the state does not fund counsel the state cannot continue the prosecution.
Instead of having a representative from legal aid decide whether or not you qualify, a judge decides. And unlike LAO’s decision-making process, judges have an obligation to ensure that accused persons rights are not compromised by their inability to pay. The Ontario Court of Appeal has made it clear that judges are mandated to ensure all accused persons receive a fair trial, and that the government has a positive obligation to fund counsel of choice in all but rare instances.
Rowbotham orders used to be considered exceptional, because it was hard to imagine a situation where state-funded legal aid programs would deny an indigent accused person funding for counsel. That is no longer the case. More and more, individuals are going to the courts to request state-funded representation because legal aid has failed to protect their rights. And these applications have been granted in an overwhelming number of cases. To read more about these developments, check out this blog post by AGP partner, Michael Spratt.
It is the sad reality that you now often need a lawyer not only to defend your charges but also to fight for your right to even have a lawyer. Our firm has successfully argued dozens of Robowtham applications over the years – both at the pre-trial and trial stage of proceedings (Click here for a recent example.)
We can assist you by bringing a Rowbotham application and by ensuring that your rights are not imperilled.
Please Contact us to learn more.
Chelsea Moore

唐炜臻

Rowbotham – The Road to Acquittal
May 12, 2015
Criminal charges can have a devastating impact on anyone’s life. There is a lot at stake. Your liberty, for one. But also your livelihood, your relationships, and your personal integrity. Hiring a criminal defence lawyer to represent you is fundamental to your defence, and often the only way to mitigate the damage before it is done.
But there is a cost.
Lawyers are expensive, and for good reason. Litigation is costly, lengthy and time consuming. Individuals who cannot afford to pay a lawyer often apply for state-funded assistance through Legal Aid Ontario. But in order to do so, you have to meet a strict eligibility test.
The criteria to qualify for Legal Aid Ontario’s certificate program are harsh. A single individual will not be eligible for publicly funded representation if they earn more than $12,135 per year. For families of two, the cut-off is $20,993. The eligibility threshold maxes out at $30,016 for families of five or more. These figures fall well-below the low-income cut-offs established by Statistics Canada.
Let’s put that in simple terms – unless you live in poverty, you will not get a lawyer. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms speaks of access to counsel – a right that is effectively denied to the poor and middle-class.
Access to justice, deemed “abysmal” in Canada, is unashamedly being denied to individuals because they own property or have a modest income. The working class is most at risk. People who make too little but not enough are left to fend for themselves, at a time when we’re told by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada that access to justice is the most pressing challenge facing the administration of justice.
There is one option of last resort to obtain counsel and preserve your right to a fair trial.
A Robowtham application is an solution for those who don’t qualify for legal aid and still can’t afford to pay legal fees out of pocket. In other words – most middle class people. It’s based on the premise that all accused persons have a right to a fair trial. This right is deeply entrenched within our constitution, as reflected in sections 7, 10(b) and 11(d) of the Charter.
If a judge decides that an accused person can’t afford to hire a lawyer and that a lawyer is essential to a fair trial, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Rowbotham insisted that proceedings may be stayed (suspended) under s. 24(1) of the Charter until such time as funding is provided. In other words, if the state does not fund counsel the state cannot continue the prosecution.
Instead of having a representative from legal aid decide whether or not you qualify, a judge decides. And unlike LAO’s decision-making process, judges have an obligation to ensure that accused persons rights are not compromised by their inability to pay. The Ontario Court of Appeal has made it clear that judges are mandated to ensure all accused persons receive a fair trial, and that the government has a positive obligation to fund counsel of choice in all but rare instances.
Rowbotham orders used to be considered exceptional, because it was hard to imagine a situation where state-funded legal aid programs would deny an indigent accused person funding for counsel. That is no longer the case. More and more, individuals are going to the courts to request state-funded representation because legal aid has failed to protect their rights. And these applications have been granted in an overwhelming number of cases. To read more about these developments, check out this blog post by AGP partner, Michael Spratt.
It is the sad reality that you now often need a lawyer not only to defend your charges but also to fight for your right to even have a lawyer. Our firm has successfully argued dozens of Robowtham applications over the years – both at the pre-trial and trial stage of proceedings (Click here for a recent example.)
We can assist you by bringing a Rowbotham application and by ensuring that your rights are not imperilled.
Please Contact us to learn more.
Chelsea Moore

唐炜臻

第一次见唐老师在群发表言论，以为您是个爱搞名堂的律师。后来发现您是充满正能量的律师，就加您，您没回，心想律事都忙，没事人家不加陌生人的。今天您给我回，我很意外。从和您的交谈口吻，觉得您不象律事。很好奇，您朋友圈又没多少信息可了解。突发奇想：百度一下，说不准能摆到呢。谁知不查不知道，一查吓一跳，原来您竟是名人！而且人生如此精彩，不由得敬佩您。其实我在想您是着了美国人的道，您一心想中国人谋利益，而且智商超人，美国人会想办法摧毁您在萌芽中的，他们不是也在做空中国奴役着中国人吗？原谅那些同胞们，他们就那样认赢不认输心态，其实这样心胸格局，人生也不会幸福的。相信您充满阳光正能量的心，会让您的未来更加精彩！做您粉丝，支持您！

唐炜臻

看过您发的有关您的资料，惊呆了：唐炜臻是个传奇！
应该说您的遭遇是美国人和加政府联手狼狈为奸造成。我们祖国的经济被多国瓜分人民被无形奴役，海外华侨没有地位任人欺凌。但这一切很快将过去，因为中国正在崛起，伴随着她的强大，她在海外的千万儿女，也将扬眉吐气成为世界各地的精英领袖！

唐炜臻

我发现很多人糊涂，把我也搞糊涂了，这叫我们华人的染缸和泥潭作用。我说我有冤，没有罪，我是有根据的，我不是要跟大家解析和狡辩，也不是要大家替我喊冤和狡辩，我有没有罪还是法庭说了算，我是说有情况，法庭有不公和错，我们有努力的目标和方向。我要筹款不是因为我穷，而是不公，有机会和办法为大家做大好事，我创造了一个极大的机会，大家不但不信，还要谴责我。我的心和目的很明显，是为大家服务，为人民服务，但几年来，在我们最困难的时候，绝望的时候也没有人主动和积极出面，只有个别老华侨鼎力相助，很多人不仗义，没有良心。我不告诉你们是我的问题，不信，想不到是你们的问题。如果我冤，不能反过来，这个世界没有人能反过了，很多人只能认命，冤是无处伸，无法喊的，其实我比大多数人幸运，我敢喊，我能喊，法官怕我喊。

唐炜臻

@cici 不能要某个人筹款搞翻译，特别是国内的朋友，筹款不是分任务，不是讨钱，讨债。
筹款是自发,自愿, 在力所能及的情况下。海外华人为自己的事有的是钱，我以前三年融资5900万。
翻译唐炜臻的法庭文件是供大家学习，研究和分享，是要让大家知道加拿大的司法真相，以便利用唐炜臻的司法文件为自己，为人民服务。
唐炜臻估计我的法庭文件翻译成中文以后，大家了解了真实情况和加拿大的法律，一旦真相大白会发生翻天覆地的变化，人人会看到自己的机会，愿意参与唐炜臻的事业，出钱出力，主动捐款解放自己和为自己的子孙后代造福。
翻译唐炜臻的文件本身是有名有利可图的，可以出名留名和得到经济报酬。