快信：唐炜臻11月4日到魁北克，5日出席证券会听证

唐炜臻

唐炜臻11月4日到魁北克的满地可市。5日到魁北克证券会


目的是跟随安省证券会结案，取消公司禁止令和讨论冻结在魁北克的资金问题。

地址: ：

The Bureau de décision et de révision

The Paul-Fortugno room,

500, blv. René-Lévesque West, suite 16.40,

Montréal

(Québec)

H2Z 1W7

[size=17.3333px]有朋友在魁北克需要联系和有兴趣讨论，可以跟我本人联系。

[size=17.3333px]我和我太太亲临魁北克证券会。

我的电话：426-886-8715

邮件：[email protected]

我是你们了解加拿大的窗口，黑白两道。

唐炜臻

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Open letter to the honorable Christopher Portner        5
The Commission, in making its decision,        6
1.        failed to observe a principle of fundamental justice:        6
2.        made an error of law:        6
3.        breached or failed to apply an commission policy:        6
4.        based its decision on erroneous or incomplete information and wrongful conviction:        6
5.        acted without jurisdiction or beyond its jurisdiction, or failed to exercise its jurisdiction:        6
OSC failed to observe the principles of fundamental justice, made me lost name, business and house and money borrowed from TD bank and freedom and life and those of investors before trial and due process.        6
Many issues would be raised including whether        7
(4)  the Court should weigh the evidence and draw its own conclusions because the OSC  failed to properly assess credibility and came to conclusions which were not supported by the evidence.        7
(5) The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “        7
(6) Staff use malicious conviction to get advantage for new allegation        7
OSC conducted an unusual search and seizure and malicious Prosecution        7
OSC also breached the constitution act and  privacy act of my investors        7
OSC hearings lacked due process not only in my case, but also in many other cases, which need serious consideration and investigation, judicial competent review.        8
The court conduct and trial judge        8
Charter Enforcement and Remedies        8
Notice of Motion to Revoke Cease Trade Order        13
Background Introduction        18
Over 100 of investors signed a petition to OSC for Mr. Weizhen Tang to trade        19
Minutes of the OCF Investors’ Meeting of October 25, 2009        26
Weizhen Tang 25 reasons to stop the extension of OSC cease order admitted as trial evidence        30
Institutional Investors after my Public Real Time Demonstration        33
唐炜臻的投资人主动为唐炜臻找资金做交易和司法辩护        56
Investors were looking for fund for Mr. Weizhen Tang to trade and defence        56
Previous Letters from Investors after OSC charges        60
Letter One        61
Letter Two        63
Letter Three        64
Letter Four        65
Letter Six        66
Letter Eight        66
Letter Nine        67
投资人纷纷来信        68
投资人来信照登 1        69
投资人来信 2        69
投资人来信 3        70
投资人的信 4        70
唐炜臻回投资人来信        71
投资人来信（8）：如果你人出了问题一切雄心壮志都成空        71
投资人年来信照登 9        72
投资人来信照登 10        72
投资人来信 12        73
投资人来信 13        73
投资人来信 14        74
投资人来信 15        75
早期投资人见证书        76
Hong Xiao, the Victim Impacts of OSC and Crown in the article of Chinese News Group        86
“Weizhen Tang:  my wife suffers because of OSC”        86
Issue with OSC and its Staff        88
ISSUES WITH OSC        91
Many issues were raised including whether:        91
1.        OSC unreasonably freeze my trading account and cease my trading and stop my legal business and destroyed my defence in no time since march 18, 2009.        91
2.        The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “        91
3.        There was a reasonable perception of bias and competent concerning the expert and incorrectly applied his own expertise to enhance the evidence;        91
4.        The so-called senior investigator, Mr. Jeff Thomson, the questions are who is him and what background and expertise he has and what he believe or not believe cause me and damages to the case and investors.        91
5.        Withholding evidence, there were 44 investors and interviews, only used those few witnesses against the accused, ignored the majority of supportive and positive evidence        91
6.        Failed to apply proper standards in determining what constitute its quash-criminal charges and charge criminally        91
7.        OSC abused my motion to lift Cease Trade order transcript from OSC Nov 13 2009 to find evidence against me, not to properly consider and make decision for my investors and business.        91
AN UNPLEASANT O.S.C. HEARING FOR WEIZHEN TANG and his clients        91
Court looks to release OSC frozen $200,000 personal funds to retain counsel on July 12, 2011        96
Transcript of Court proceedings  to argue before  Justice Nordheimer to release personal funds frozen by OSC to retain counsel August 15 ,  2011        114
And when my (the judge) first inquiry at the pretrial of Mr. Tang is, “ do you intend to continue to represent yourself in these proceedings?” I am told immediately that he is desirous of having counsel with respect to this matter,        115
Transcript of Court proceedings  of August 15, 2011 p. 13        116
Nordheimer J. Noticed that Mr. Tang’s right to use those funds to fulfill his constitutional rights to counsel and to make full answer and defence?        116
Body of law: Mareva injunctions        117
Transcript of Court proceedings  to argue Rowbotham Application before  Justice Nordheimer  on         September 23,  2011        118
Mr. Hutchison: one might ask that with respect to every single fraudster who walks in here and has legal aid.        118
Justice Nordheimer: They might.        118
Merits of the proposed appeal based on the supplemental record or supplemental arguments not before Rosenberg J.A.        119
Nordheimer J. erred in refusing to appoint counsel for the applicant pursuant to my R. v. Tang Rowbotham application;        119
The evidence of the crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigators as opposed to an “ independent “        119
The trial judge erred in finding that this was an appropriate case for a fine in lieu of forfeiture given the purpose of such an Order (i.e. to deprive fraudster of their unlawful person gain).        119
My Ideas, Theory and Practice and Experience and Recount My Injustice: The Truth, Evidences and History, Fascinating Story and Recount Index        120
The Collapse of Lehman Brothers and induced 2008 global financial crisis and erosion of  $10 trillion in market capitalization in Oct, 2008        121
OSC Massive Investigation and Gross Violation of Investors’ Right and Privacy and Attacking Chinese Investors by OSC Staff for months        124
OSC lead SEC to investigated Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership        124
SEC appointed Receivership and  Seize and Stolen Fund from My  Investors and Business        124
My Intention to have massive lawsuits against Media and OSC , the police and the crown for Defamation, Slander and Libel to stop them        124
SEC Interlocutory Judgment: “NO ADMISSION AND NO DENY”, SEC asked AND  RUN AWAY        124
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership Meeting Minutes , dated  October 25, 2009.        124
IMPORTANT COURT PROCEEDING AND TIMELINE INDEX        125

遥望王师又一年

唐先生对资金兴趣浓厚，尽管未必最感兴趣【还有比大钱更感兴趣的东西】。

资金问题说好办也好办，说难办也难办。
1、本人或亲朋好友有资金吗？若有则资金问题岂不解决了？
2、若希望从亲朋好友之外的人得到资金则需要赢得有资金的人的高度信任。

遥望王师又一年

喜欢钱的人可多了。

资金从哪里来？从傻子或无知那里来？！真有本事则从洋人那里搞到大量资金，不过需要会说洋话、看懂洋文、会写洋字。

我估计毛泽东思想能得逞一时但时间久了会寸步难行，毛泽东思想的主要内容是斗，核心是骗人害人，通常是骗民。

遥望王师又一年

投资的目的都是为了挣钱而不是为了亏钱，更不是为了让大钱打水漂【肉包子打狗】。

唐炜臻

唐炜臻现在很活跃在加拿大的法庭和证券会，积累了丰富的经验。
唐炜臻和夫人于11月4日开车到魁北克省首府满地可，经当地朋友华人接待入住酒店。11日经朋友陪同一起参加魁北克省的听证会。
一到魁北克省监管局，接待员秘书告知唐炜臻11月5日的议程是排期，对方要求继续延长临时交易禁止令。
下午两点钟正是开始，唐炜臻一案排行第三，轮到唐炜臻的时候，证券会主席问唐炜臻是否有意见，唐炜臻当场表示反对临时交易禁止令和冻结六年太长，证券会主席临时决定受理并请专门的法官听证双方陈词和辩论，一直到下午四点才结束。法官（证券会专员）宣布听证结束，唐炜臻回家等结果。听证会结束后，唐炜臻马不停蹄开车回到多伦多已经快到午夜。
第二天，唐炜臻有清早开车到多伦多市中心的安省证券会讨论冻结的资金和个人交易禁止令和安排下一步的议事日程，包括公众听证要不要对唐炜臻进行证券方面的行政和法规限制已结案。因为预定的时间关系，会议延期到11月25日。安省证券会容许唐炜臻有六个投资人和公众明年一月份为自己辩护。

人参娃娃

P民的税钱就这样被轻飘飘地挥霍着。拿着高薪的法官大人们连犯罪和精神病都分不清，一点屁事也要审好几年。