昨天法官的判决书

唐炜臻

昨天的司法胜利,法庭拿到了银行律师的钱, 律师现在不能再随便拿我的钱, 告我的人说我欠他们7,80万, 尽管是法庭判的, 昨天也没有从法庭拿到我的钱，我们现在有机会夺回部分或者全部的钱，银行和银行的律师想结案,不留后患，法官不同意，现在他们要对我们的损失可能要负责。


T.D. vs Tang


Date： Jan 13/16


The defendants have appeared and take a strong position that the action of the plaintiff have been wrongful. They ask that not only the surplus funds be paid into court, but all the money received from the sale be paid into court. The execution creditors, for their part, claim that no money should be paid in, rather, they should be paid their pro rata share of the funds immediately.
In my view, the fairest deposition is to require the funds to be paid into court. If the defendants have a claim, they can asset it (together with any additional claim they may make in another proceeding if as advised ) on any motion to pay out the funds.

Order to issue as signed by me. The cross motion is adjourned

Justice Gray  

Attached please find a copy of the endorsement

唐炜臻

湖南商会会长说“陈望抓小偷的事改变了加拿大法律，希望你唐炜臻的案例也要改变加拿大法律”。我早说过陈旺的案子，我去过他的法庭，国会议员邹智慧也去过他的法庭，福建同乡会也去过才扳过来，我的案子比陈旺他的复杂得多,价值和司法用途更大，影响更深，我希望国会议员谭耕和湖南同乡会,华人积极参与，这是一个极大司法和投资机会，牵涉到数千万，几个亿的经济价值,社会价值。打官司就是打仗，成者为王，败者为寇，要看我们大家的努力和能力。