• 实时天气:多伦多 28°
    温度感觉: 27°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 21°
    温度感觉: 23°
  • 实时天气:卡加利 28°
    温度感觉: 26°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 24°
    温度感觉: 28°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 24°
    温度感觉: 24°
查看: 1445|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

胳膊扭不过大腿,唐炜臻上诉申请被拒

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-4-7 10:45:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
News Releases
  
Title:
  
  
Judgments in Leave Applications
  
  
Collection:
  
  
News Releases
  
  
Date:
  
  
2016-04-07
  
SupremeCourt of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
  
(le fran?ais suit)
JUDGMENTSIN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
April 7, 2016
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The SupremeCourt of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in thefollowing applications for leave to appeal.
Summaries of these cases areavailable at http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/news/en/item/5203/index.do.
JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDESD’AUTORISATION
Le 7 avril 2016
Pour diffusion immédiate
Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty theQueen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36754)
(The motion for an extension of time to serve and file theapplication for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel isdismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The applicationfor leave to appeal is dismissed. /
La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et dedép?t de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La requête en nominationd’un procureur est rejetée. La requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments depreuve est rejetée. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.)
Coram: Cromwell / Wagner / C?té

A expert react

Am shocked. Completely. Nothing to say at all.

I have read the notation of yourcase. The only reason they dismissed it is because they did not accept theaffidavit constituting new evidence. If they had accepted the new evidenceregarding Peter Boushy and Legal Aid refusal to fund counsel, you would havewon the case. But these course took the easy way and dismissed application forleave to adduce new evidence.
The only thing is to write a book to expose the injustice.It is to go public.
****

沙发
发表于 2016-4-7 11:53:49 | 只看该作者
查查, 有没有比最高法院还大的法院, 去上诉?
回复

使用道具 举报

板凳
发表于 2016-4-7 14:25:26 | 只看该作者
看来这个老唐还没疯,还分得清胳膊大腿的比例,这个老唐也就是一个典型知识分子的思路,自作聪明,想走捷径?以为可以“翻案”?一旦翻案,所有人都会立即对他另眼相看?哈,就像叫这个老唐改变不仁不义的本性,有可能吗?没有。所以一样,翻案?哈,没有可能。捷径,就更没有了。
回复

使用道具 举报

地板
发表于 2016-4-7 14:27:55 | 只看该作者
以前哪个电影里的?在人民政府面前抵赖?没有用!哈
回复

使用道具 举报

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-7 15:09:49 | 只看该作者
JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
April 7, 2016
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in the following applications for leave to appeal.

JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36754)
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel is dismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. /
Expert Opinion

Am shocked. Completely. Nothing to say at all.

I have read the notation of your case. The only reason they dismissed it is because they did not accept the affidavit constituting new evidence. If they had accepted the new evidence regarding Peter Boushy and Legal Aid refusal to fund counsel, you would have won the case. But these courts took the easy way and dismissed application for leave to adduce new evidence.
The only thing is to write a book to expose the injustice. It is to go public.
回复

使用道具 举报

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-7 15:11:02 | 只看该作者
胳膊扭不过大腿,唐炜臻申请允许上诉被拒。
唐炜臻一个人正在面对几十个律师和法官,面对强大的政府力量。
不是势均力敌,而是蚂蚁拌大象。没有中间力量。真正的胜利需要来自人民群众的支持和参与,
今天是决定很多人的命运的一天,特别是我,关系到大家的极大利益, 证券会,律师,法官和投资人,大家都在等最高法院的消息。
相当于他们死,输,我活,我赢,关系到法庭的名誉和声誉的问题,权力在他们手里。他们要维护司法的完整性和自己的尊严,面子。
他们目无国法,破坏司法程序搞我。
人们普遍以为他们是公平的,其实不然。
回复

使用道具 举报

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-7 19:03:12 | 只看该作者
36754

Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Date         Proceeding         Filed By
(if applicable)
Proceedings 2016-04-07         Decision on the application for leave to appeal, Cro Wa C?t, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel is dismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal from the judgments of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Numbers C56745 and C60528, dated June 10, 2015, June 25, 2015 and October 5, 2015, is dismissed.
Dismissed        
2016-04-07         Decision on motion to adduce new evidence, Cro Wa C?t
Dismissed        
2016-04-07         Decision on the motion to appoint counsel, Cro Wa C?t
Dismissed        
2016-04-07         Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, Cro Wa C?t
Granted        
2016-03-07         All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Cro Wa C?t        
2016-03-07         Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, Cro Wa C?t        
2016-03-07         Submission of motion to appoint counsel, Cro Wa C?t        
2016-03-07         Submission of motion to adduce new evidence, Cro Wa C?t        
2015-12-08         Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, File opened on 2015-12-08        
2015-12-08         Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Motion for the decision of 2015-06-25, Completed on: 2015-12-08         Weizhen Tang
2015-12-02         Letter requesting materials at end of review period; Court file no. not assigned        
2015-11-27         Letter acknowledging receipt of an application for leave to appeal        
2015-11-26         Motion to appoint counsel, (Included in the application for leave to appeal), Completed on: 2015-11-26         Weizhen Tang
2015-11-26         Motion to adduce new evidence, (Included in the application for leave to appeal), Completed on: 2015-11-26         Weizhen Tang
2015-11-26         Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Included in the application for leave to appeal)         Weizhen Tang
2015-11-26         Application for leave to appeal, (4 volumes), C/A order from 2015-10-05 is missing - Rec'd on 2015-12-10. C/A order from 2015-06-25 rec'd on 2015-12-08, Completed on: 2015-12-10
回复

使用道具 举报

8#
发表于 2016-4-9 00:39:18 | 只看该作者
因为老唐进去了,好久都没来51.ca
如今老唐终于出来了。
回复

使用道具 举报

9#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-9 13:10:20 | 只看该作者
昨天遇到几个打官司有经验的朋友,从武汉来的,我们发现这是一个奇怪的领域,华人在海外打官司很薄弱,需要培养教育和训练,打官司是个好生意,我们可以一起来打,把它做成一个大生意,我们自己研究,自主,尽心尽力,价廉物美,发挥主管能动性和自由。用自己的案例和知识经验帮助别人。

很多人遇到官司头痛,紧张,害怕,逃跑。请律师没有钱,更麻烦的是,一般律师收钱不办事,办不了事,把你卖了还要你付钱。

最好是请律师有经验的人们把案子先搞清楚,法律研究清楚,战略战术,搞清楚,文件做好,让当事人出面或者请律师出庭就行。
回复

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2016-4-9 18:05:22 | 只看该作者
厉害,非常厉害
回复

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-9 18:27:03 | 只看该作者
—————  2016-04-09  —————

唐炜臻  18:52

昨天遇到几个打官司有经验的朋友,我们发现这是一个奇怪的领域,华人在海外打官司很薄弱,需要培养教育和训练,打官司是个好生意,我们可以一起来打,把它做成一个大生意,我们自己研究,自主,尽心尽力,价廉物美,发挥主管能动性和自由。用自己的案例和知识经验帮助别人。

很多人遇到官司头痛,紧张,害怕,逃跑。请律师没有钱,更麻烦的是,一般律师收钱不办事,办不了事,把你卖了还要你付钱。

最好是先请有经验的人们把案子先自己搞清楚,法律研究清楚,战略战术,搞清楚,文件做好,让当事人自己出面或者请律师出庭就行。

唐老师在如此境遇中,还能想到要用自己的案例帮助别人,说明唐老师是一个坚持正义,乐于助人的人。想信所有支持正义的人们,都会支持您。

我是全心全意为投资人和人民群众服务的,始终把投资人的利益放在首位,我的打官司难度越大,作用越大,影响越大,利益就越大,我坚信我一定会赢的,前天是一个十分重要的决定,但不是唯一的决定,我会有很多法庭活动,越打越有经验和智慧,力量。

打官司,最佳方案是自力更生,艰苦奋斗。案情自己最清楚,法律明白,知己知彼,百战不胜。

相信会有水落石出真相大白的一天,但这也许也是一个异常艰辛漫长的过程。
回复

使用道具 举报

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-9 20:23:33 | 只看该作者
RICKCANADA 发表于 2016-4-7 14:27
以前哪个电影里的?在人民政府面前抵赖?没有用!哈

你认为我当时对你不好,不要你为我工作,是我不仁不义,你也一再表示不会落井下石,你现在的行为说明什么?
回复

使用道具 举报

13#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-4-10 09:23:14 | 只看该作者
加拿大老张 发表于 2016-4-7 11:53
查查, 有没有比最高法院还大的法院, 去上诉?

还有司法部专案审查的,叫司法流产审查
回复

使用道具 举报

14#
发表于 2016-4-12 11:29:58 | 只看该作者
唐炜臻 发表于 2016-4-9 20:23
你认为我当时对你不好,不要你为我工作,是我不仁不义,你也一再表示不会落井下石,你现在的行为说明什么 ...

哈,以前,你是不仁不义,剥削了我的劳动,但是,我曾承诺“不会落井下石”,对你“以德报怨”,多年来我也履行了!但是,第二个但是,你再次辜负了我的好意,竟然恶语相向,大放厥词,只能说明你不是君子,唐老鸭一个。所以,对小人我必须收回承诺,兼职主持正义,哈哈哈。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表