• 实时天气:多伦多 28°
    温度感觉: 27°
  • 实时天气:温哥华 21°
    温度感觉: 23°
  • 实时天气:卡加利 28°
    温度感觉: 26°
  • 实时天气:蒙特利尔 24°
    温度感觉: 28°
  • 实时天气:温尼伯 24°
    温度感觉: 24°
查看: 718|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

快讯:美国参议院委员会10:7批准攻击叙利亚决议

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-9-5 06:28:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 hls812 于 2013-9-5 12:10 编辑

这一次
美国支持塔利班
攻击叙利亚

这一次
美国授权诺贝尔世界和平奖得主
攻击叙利亚

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/09/04/senate-syria-committee-vote/2762415/

又一次
美国越过联合国
侵略他国

又一次
美国民众55:30反对叙利亚战争
民众是个屁
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 07:10:40 | 只看该作者
September 4, 2013

Committee voted 10-7, with both Democrats and Republicans voting for and against resolution.

WASHINGTON — The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted to authorize President Obama to use limited force against Syria Wednesday, after adopting amendments from Sen. John McCain designed to urge Obama to "change the military equation on the battlefield."

The Senate resolution would limit hostilities to 60 or 90 days, narrow military action to Syria's borders and prohibit U.S. troops on Syrian soil. McCain's proposal didn't change that scope but urged that the end goal should be "a negotiated settlement that ends the conflict and leads to a democratic government in Syria."

The vote was 10-7. Five Republicans and two Democrats voted against it. Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., voted "present."

The White House commended senators for "moving swiftly and for working across party lines on behalf of our national security."

The committee's consensus followed hours closed-door meetings Wednesday morning, which delayed the start of the committee's business by nearly three hours. As the Senate panel voted, their House counterparts heard from Secretary of State John Kerry, who appealed to their sense of humanity to stop Syria's use of chemical weapons.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted against the resolution, and unsuccessfully sought an amendment that would have reaffirmed Congress's pre-eminent role in declaring war, as reflected in the 1973 War Powers Act. "The Constitution doesn't really differentiate between big wars and small wars," he said. The committee tabled Paul's amendment by a 14-5 vote.

Paul remains a staunch opponent of an attack on Syria, and had left open the possibility of a filibuster. He said Wednesday that any suggestion he had made a decision to block the resolution with endless debate was "a misinterpretation by the media."

The committee also rejected an amendment by Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., that would have prohibited air and naval forces from being put into Syrian waters or air space. In the end, Udall was the only one to support it. "If we start down this road, we're going to be running the campaign from here, and as smart as we are, we're not that smart," said McCain, R-Ariz. Udall voted against the final resolution.

McCain's amendments were co-sponsored by Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del. The McCain-Coons amendments seek a "democratic government in Syria," despite arguments by the Obama administration that "regime change" is not the goal. And they call for giving military and humanitarian aid to "vetted elements of the Syrian opposition forces, including the Free Syrian Army."

The committee approved those amendments by a voice vote.

One unresolved issue was what happens after the resolution's time limit. The president would be authorized to strike for 60 days — and an additional 30 days if he tells Congress it's necessary. "The question that's been raised is, what happens on the 91st day? What happens if Assad decides on that 91st day to use chemical weapons again?" asked Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.

Committee Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said Congress should "make sure Assad understands he can't just wait us out, use chemical weapons, and face no consequences."

Democrats who voted against the resolution said the Senate version was much improved over the language the White House suggested, which contained no limits on Obama's power to rid Syria of chemical weapons. Udall said he feared any action could escalate the Syrian civil war and perhaps expand into regional conflict. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said he gagged every time he saw photos of the Syrian victims of chemical weapons but voted no because "I have deep concerns about the limits of American power."

After the vote, Menendez said the committee action bodes well for passage by the full body. He noted the support of McCain on the right, and Durbin on the left, "and I think that's a pretty good width as far as the spectrum of views in the United States Senate." He said the timing of the full Senate vote was "above my pay grade."

Voting yes were Menendez; Coons; Durbin; McCain; Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.; Ben Cardin, D-Md.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Tim Kaine, D-Va., Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.

Voting no were Udall; Murphy; Paul; James Risch, R-Idaho; Marco Rubio, R-Fla.; Ron Johnson, R-Wis.; and John Barrasso, R-Wyo.
回复

使用道具 举报

板凳
发表于 2013-9-5 07:50:50 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 遥望王师又一年 于 2013-9-5 08:54 编辑

接下来才进入关键时期,战争是残酷无情的,无非是三种结局:赢了、输了、平了[和了,没赢没输地停了]。

我认为这次战争会对国际大局产生重要影响甚至深运影响,这次战争本应成为美国的世界霸权急剧衰落的分水岭。就看俄罗斯与中国、德国等国的能力、水平与合作得如何了。
当然还要靠叙利亚等中东阿拉伯国家的团结合作、卓有成效地迎战与应对。

奥巴马在豪赌,我判断美国这次若输了则紧接着难有更大的豪赌,更难有特大豪赌。
奥巴马的这次豪赌并不大,俄罗斯、中国、德国等国完全吃得消,大不了阿萨德垮台!
关键在于如何尽可能大地消耗美国、让美国尽可能大的得不偿失?!
回复

使用道具 举报

地板
发表于 2013-9-5 07:58:14 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 遥望王师又一年 于 2013-9-5 09:00 编辑

叙利亚等阿拉伯国家可以与中国、日本大搞贸易往来,一方面向中国扩大石油等出口,另一方面从中国大量进口急需的物资,除了大规模杀伤性武器之外一般都可以买。大到导弹,小到医药、食品。
回复

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2013-9-5 08:01:51 | 只看该作者
中国必要时要求美国政府不得将中国人的钱用于侵略,要求黑小子奥巴马做出承诺。
回复

使用道具 举报

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 08:02:28 | 只看该作者
中东地区只有伊朗支持叙利亚
沙特卡塔尔土耳其全部支持美国

除了俄罗斯
欧洲全部支持美国
回复

使用道具 举报

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 08:07:53 | 只看该作者
攻打叙利亚
彻底阻断伊朗石油西输路线

沙特全部被封闭
海湾石油西输路线全部被控制
回复

使用道具 举报

8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 08:09:59 | 只看该作者
皮球踢回给了诺贝尔世界和平奖得主
回复

使用道具 举报

9#
发表于 2013-9-5 08:40:27 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 遥望王师又一年 于 2013-9-5 09:43 编辑
皮球踢回给了诺贝尔世界和平奖得主
hls812 发表于 2013-9-5 09:09

应该给奥巴马画个巨幅画像:
1、身上悬挂诺贝尔和平奖,比如脖子里挂着诺贝尔和平奖奖牌或一手举着诺贝尔和平奖奖状与奖金!
2、一手高举导弹!比如巡航导弹,或举个大炸弹正要向下面的叙利亚首都或黑压压的叙利亚人群投弹。
3、奥巴马身边是美国航母与美国轰炸机。
4、醒目地注解: “Yes , we can ! ”
回复

使用道具 举报

10#
发表于 2013-9-5 10:40:36 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 无忧了 于 2013-9-5 12:14 编辑
皮球踢回给了诺贝尔世界和平奖得主
hls812 发表于 2013-9-5 09:09
上周,老汉听到奥巴马说“48小时内出兵”,坐等。。。
我承认他当时喝了点猫尿。
回复

使用道具 举报

11#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 11:07:34 | 只看该作者
闭门造车容易
刷刷嘴皮子也化不了几个钱
但对战争的残酷性
能有多少人有清醒认识
对战争将要付出的代价
能有多少认识
多少无辜平民将要失去生命

这一次
阿萨德攻击科威特或者以色列了吗
回复

使用道具 举报

12#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-9-5 11:12:26 | 只看该作者
本帖最后由 hls812 于 2013-9-5 12:19 编辑
应该给奥巴马画个巨幅画像:
1、身上悬挂诺贝尔和平奖,比如脖子里挂着诺贝尔和平奖奖牌或一手举着诺贝尔和平奖奖状与奖金!
2、一手高举导弹!比如巡航导弹,或举个大炸弹正要向下面的叙利亚首都或黑压压的叙利亚人群投弹。
3、奥巴马身边是美国航母与美国轰炸机。
4、醒目地注解: “Yes , we can ! ”
遥望王师又一年 发表于 2013-9-5 09:40















回复

使用道具 举报

13#
发表于 2013-9-5 12:00:04 | 只看该作者
就是要揭露美国政要说的比唱的还好听、可老干大坏事[冒天下之大不韪]!是披着羊皮的恶狼!
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 免费注册

本版积分规则

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表