无罪推定原则 is a criminal law concept. In civil laws, the operating principle is balance of probabilities.
In Zhang's compassionate application, she must submit information to answer all these questions, in order to be considered that she is eligible to stay in Canada on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.
I understand this is all Zhang's privacy and none of others' business. However, Mr. Kellogg is asking for public support to "bomb" the Ministry with emails. The case then has become a public interest and the public has the rights to know before writing an email.
For example, I want to know where the man is. Is he involved? Does he pay child support? Can he look after the child? Is Zhang covering him up because he is also illegal in Canada? The answers to these questions will affect her compassionate application and will help 51ers to decide whether to give her the support.作者: 久石让的粉丝 时间: 2007-4-19 10:59 最初由[小心为上]发布
当年她黑下来---错了
黑下来有生孩子---又错了
想用孩子给自己弄身份----更错
无罪推定原则 is a criminal law concept. In civil laws, the operating principle is balance of probabilities.
In Zhang's compassionate application, she must submit information to answer all these questions, in order to be considered that she is eligible to stay in Canada on humanitarian and compassionate grounds.
I understand this is all Zhang's privacy and none of others' business. However, Mr. Kellogg is asking for public support to "bomb" the Ministry with emails. The case then has become a public interest and the public has the rights to know before writing an email.
For example, I want to know where the man is. Is he involved? Does he pay child support? Can he look after the child? Is Zhang covering him up because he is also illegal in Canada? The answers to these questions will affect his compassionate application and will help 51ers to decide whether to give her the support.
How does she predict her child and her lives in the future in Canada? :confused: Can you?作者: 三个戴表 时间: 2007-4-19 12:45 最初由[Arthur001]发布
假如我了解了事情的所有真相,知道她是一个什么样的人,我有可能去同情帮助她。(这是在她正直、诚实、又受了许多不该受的委屈的前提下)
一个人不愿意暴露隐私也可以理解,但是有另一个问题,现在正是可以得到他人了解和同情的最好时机,张女士却任何情况都不提供。这就让人无法相信她是值得帮助的。
一个人的经历可能有光彩的一面,也有不光彩的一面,在这个需要帮助的时刻,完全可以暴露她光彩的可以见人的那一面,这对她和她的孩子只有好处。但是遗憾的是她什么也不能提供,不得不让人怀疑她十年的经历都是不可见人的。
我们在不了解一个人的时候是不是要无原则的去帮一个人确实是值得考虑的问题。有时表面是做好事但是实际却成全了罪恶。
--------------
問題就在這裏,大家想知道的,她說是隱私,什麼也不說。罷了!但她一點也沒少說,對著西人媒體講什麼14萬(應該是加元,既然是對西人媒體講的)罰款、17000加元的教育費。還有女兒是加拿大公民在中國會受到歧視,成為二等公民,沒有前途等。
To 51.ca, if you have the capability to help her, then just do it. Do not set up condition(s) for giving a hand to who needs help, esp peeking for her privacy.作者: 堂堂正 时间: 2007-4-19 16:27 标题: 回复:做人要厚道,重复我的反对理由 一直关注张虹母女的情况。看了这篇做人要厚道的道理,很赞成,但实在不敢苟同那反对的理由。