无忧论坛

标题: 反贫困组织：牛奶金可以增至5400元 [打印本页]

作者: jlxu 时间: 2012-11-22 10:07
标题: 反贫困组织：牛奶金可以增至5400元
If CTTB increases to $5400, many poor family will have more babys. they wouldn't provide good education for them.

作者: jlxu 时间: 2012-11-22 10:11
Many poor family will have more children for making money.

作者: panda50 时间: 2012-11-22 10:13
那只能是越帮越穷. 今年5400, 再过几年就是7800.

作者: GPS1 时间: 2012-11-22 10:37
有利于增加人口。

作者: HAPPY KITTEN 时间: 2012-11-22 10:50
:bhuhhh:俗语说救得了急救不了穷……高福利固然好，但是也是滋生懒惰的温床。看看希腊这些国家吧，教训啊！

作者: 从来没有救世主 时间: 2012-11-22 11:03
回复 1# jlxu

如果政府取消税收，每个人的HST自动变成收入，也很可观啊！

这么做的好处是政府廉政了，百姓购买力增加了，促进流通领域发展，大到买房买车，小到超市一元店，餐馆咖啡馆都会大有起色。

政府怎么不做呢？

作者: jlxu 时间: 2012-11-22 11:22
回复 6# 从来就没救世主

The problem is that many middle level people have to pay the high priced house so they have to cut off the regular spending. I know many poor people, whose family has 7 children. Some families have 3 development disorder children out of 5 or 7. I can't understand why they keep going. They never think about children. They are only interested of taking money.

If $5,400 per year per child, many family will make more children for money instead of working. Every family shoud be responsible to plan for how many children to have with their own budget.

I don't mean to take away the birth right away from low income people.

I think $5400 can be for first child and rest of child benefit should be reduced. Goverment should send stamps/tickets ( not cash) used for child educations, food and clothes.

作者: jlxu 时间: 2012-11-22 11:22
标题: RE: 反贫困组织：牛奶金可以增至5400元
回复 6# 从来就没救世主

The problem is that many middle level people have to pay the high priced house so they have to cut off the regular spending. I know many poor people, whose family has 7 children. Some families have 3 development disorder children out of 5 or 7. I can't understand why they keep going. They never think about children. They are only interested of taking money.

If $5,400 per year per child, many family will make more children for money instead of working. Every family shoud be responsible to plan for how many children to have with their own budget.

I don't mean to take away the birth right away from low income people.

I think $5400 can be for first child and rest of child benefit should be reduced. Goverment should send stamps/tickets ( not cash) used for child educations, food and clothes.

作者: 从来没有救世主 时间: 2012-11-22 11:49

回复从来就没救世主

The problem is that many middle level people have to pay the high priced house so they have to cut off the regular spending. I know many poor people, whose family has 7 children. Some families have 3 development disorder children out of 5 or 7. I can't understand why they keep going. They never think about children. They are only interested of taking money.

If $5,400 per year per child, many family will make more children for money instead of working. Every family shoud be responsible to plan for how many children to have with their own budget.

I don't mean to take away the birth right away from low income people.

I think $5400 can be for first child and rest of child benefit should be reduced. Goverment should send stamps/tickets ( not cash) used for child educations, food and clothes.
jlxu 发表于 2012-11-22 11:22 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif

所以我要求政府减税，而不是给穷人发救济发苦胖。

只有活跃了经济，才能带动生产力，提高人民生活水平。减税促生产是正面推动，扩大内需，增加就业。而发救济只是救得一时之急，不能带动社会需求，穷人只能更依赖政府补贴，生活上只能更穷。中小企业产品无销路，又要支付高的地税、物业，不可能扩大再生产，就不会有新的就业职位。

作者: 善先生 时间: 2012-11-22 12:01
有卖省长在台上，可能，，，，他生长在9个孩子的家庭。，他辞职啦，还是加税吧，从地税开始，加一点就是大头，，，，，，把房子的估价定高点就行，向万锦市学习，，，，安省有5万多注册地产经纪，他们可以再努力一点，不要总报自己低收入，，，，，，

作者: www2 时间: 2012-11-22 22:27
牛奶金至少80%以上进了毒犯口袋，烟酒商店，或赌博。一个家庭贫穷是因为大人没
有工作，吸毒，烟酒赌博成瘾。如果大人能把牛奶金用于孩子身上，说明这是一个
负责任的家庭，一般不会出现赤贫。同时查一查，为了牛奶金有多少人在偷税漏税。
取消牛奶金，这个病态社会将会前进一步。

欢迎光临无忧论坛 (https://bbs.51.ca/)