贵族工会还是很有力量的，多数政客包括哈伯都不敢惹，敢怒不敢言。普通市民没有发言的机会。福特还是很牛的。下届即使落选也是正常的。，
vvvvvvvvvvvvvv 发表于 2011-12-22 09:42 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
真正的牛人是不会落选的，看看隔壁的老太太就知道了!
福特除了嘴巴很牛，其他方面用猪形容更贴切！
kanada 发表于 2011-12-22 09:47 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
本人觉得福特还是在做事，总比那些随意扩张政府机构，随意化纳税人的钱，什么事也不做的老好人市长要好，福特精简机构，减少开支，降低不必要的浪费，纠正不合理的项目，没有给贵族工会献媚，没有向大的财团曲膝等等，历史将会证明他是一个好市长，如果本人猜得不错的话，他将继续连任，因为投票还是靠大多数人，而大多数人心里明白，但是没有说出来而已。
大忽悠 发表于 2011-12-22 10:02 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
过奖了，过奖了，
没献媚？没曲膝？那要看对谁！
警察的4年每年3%，预算不减反增怎么回事？
借你的名字用一下，历史将会证明他是一个大忽悠！
kanada 发表于 2011-12-22 10:12 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
请不要总是那警察说事，警察是一个非常特殊的行业，关系到社会稳定的问题，对于这种特殊的行业，需要逐渐理顺，不能下猛药。如果明年有很多退休，而且不增员，那也是一种降低开支，不要只看那3%。不能因为一件事就否定他的工作。苗大为倒是挺好的，那大家的钱，建立了那么多机构，雇用了那么多人，办事效率越来越低，你倒是找不出他的毛病，但是他把你的钱给了别人，你还给他鼓掌呢。
大忽悠 发表于 2011-12-22 10:35 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
苗大为已经是过去时，评论他的得失可以再开十个题目。我说得是现在和将来。
“不能因为一件事就否定他的工作“，没错。我再给你说几件事：
Javis的单车线建的时候花了5万，为什么要花21万铲掉，再到sheppard去建！
21万，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
花300万，请KPMG作查找浪费，结果人家告诉你市府没有浪费，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
transit city, 破坏市容，必须停止，违约费怎么办？交，6500万，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
你说，他把垃圾工外包，省了800万。中立调研机构说，此次外判，有1100万的盈利金额存疑。也就是说是省800万还是亏300万还不知道！即使运气好没有亏,受益的是谁？是纳税人吗？是资本家！
你说，外判垃圾工，给广大市民出气了，没错！
没错吗，那些捣乱的垃圾工还没下岗呢，不干活市府要养着。
kanada 发表于 2011-12-22 11:16 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
好生奇怪！这样一个能为民减负而又清廉的好市长, 并不多见, 居然还有人对他横挑鼻子竖挑眼？除了政敌，恐怕也就是嫌多市的税收还不过瘾的什么东东了。有些人总是自以为是，其实挺贱的。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-22 12:02 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
报纸当会有倾向，可是像星报那样党派观点强烈的报纸，全加拿大没有第二家。福特敢于向星报说不，也开了政客不再在媒体面前底声下气的先河，令人佩服。星报的党派立场已经完全和媒体监督无关，纯粹泄愤。
辣翻天 发表于 2011-12-22 18:44 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
好像没有任何封杀的事实出现，福特不愿接受星报采访，这不应该是问题。多伦多有其它报纸，福特可以通过那些报纸将自己的想法告诉市民。本周，他就刚接受了中文的新时代电视的采访，他讲了削支的理由，为何杯葛星报等问题。这次访问将在下周五晚上十时36频道播出。福特不喜欢星报，杯葛星报，这和封杀完全是两回事。星报没有因为福特的杯葛，掉了生意。福特也没有因为星报的无耻攻击，而影响他削支的决心。
辣翻天 发表于 2011-12-22 20:28 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
反对福特的能把身份亮明吗?
2012年的预算比2011年少不是福特的功劳吗? 你们特权工会还有什么办法攻击这一点?
MILLER对你们好, 市政府花费年增加7%. 他在位七年花钱无数, 挖了大坑, 自己知道玩不下去了, 连任选都不敢选了.
攻击福特的都和MILLER一样, 花别人的钱填自己的腰包.
咱普通老百姓 发表于 2011-12-22 23:30 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
不出所料，福特两个字一出现，工会驻51的特派员之一又开始上班了。说别人是福卫兵，其实别人根本都没讲几句，倒是他自己左一贴右一贴没完没了，干劲冲天。
别告诉我这么玩命攻击福特，是为了多伦多的城市发展和市民的幸福生活，傻子都不信。不如干脆直接说因为自己铁饭碗没以前那么铁了，内心紧张焦虑急躁气愤，从而坚守在网上努力宣泄。可惜啊，民主社会选出的官员，除非本人在职犯罪，否则就得老老实实地等他届满，焦急也没用。
四年后选民根据福特的表现，自然会用选票做出选择的，用不着谁来指点开导。
epoxy 发表于 2011-12-23 01:25 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
苗大为已经是过去时，评论他的得失可以再开十个题目。我说得是现在和将来。
“不能因为一件事就否定他的工作“，没错。我再给你说几件事：
Javis的单车线建的时候花了5万，为什么要花21万铲掉，再到sheppard去建！
21万，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
花300万，请KPMG作查找浪费，结果人家告诉你市府没有浪费，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
transit city, 破坏市容，必须停止，违约费怎么办？交，6500万，小钱，你不在乎是吧，对，好像他也不在乎!
你说，他把垃圾工外包，省了800万。中立调研机构说，此次外判，有1100万的盈利金额存疑。也就是说是省800万还是亏300万还不知道！即使运气好没有亏,受益的是谁？是纳税人吗？是资本家！
你说，外判垃圾工，给广大市民出气了，没错！
没错吗，那些捣乱的垃圾工还没下岗呢，不干活市府要养着。
kanada 发表于 2011-12-22 11:16 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
看来你对苗大为颇为不满，如果你觉得福特不好，你要是当上了市长，应该怎么做？
福特是做生意出身，而且看的长远，全面。不要眼中只盯着这几个钱，而且垃圾工外包，这是个正确的选择，垃圾工在私营企业就是盈利，而在政府就是包袱。不能把这两件事相提并论。
Transit city也是正确的选择，轻轨影响市容市貌，而且防止噪声需要大量的钱，如果建成，将来再拆，将会损失更大。
市长作必要的财务检查是应该的，这叫做审计。
学着点。
大忽悠 发表于 2011-12-23 13:33 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
Kanada有点"舌战群儒"的味道.很搞笑.看来是有闲阶级.很高兴从网上看到还是明白人多呀. kanada你就不要"瞎子摸大象"啦.
heleng 发表于 2011-12-23 16:05 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
AN OPEN LETTER
A Call to Eliminate Anti-Asian Racism
November 23, 2010
We, the undersigned, believe that the “Too Asian”? article in the Maclean’smagazine and the “Asian students suffering for success” article in the Toronto Star newspaper, published on November 10, 2010, worked to racially profile and stereotype Asian Canadians as perpetual foreigners in Canada. These articles served to reinforce anti-Asian resentment and antagonism by raising anxieties over Canada’s changing demographics and the emergence of China and India as global powers. Both media outlets generated binary “us” versus “them” distinctions between white and Asian Canadians, consequently inciting racial antipathy and division, instead of fostering a constructive dialogue on diversity and integration.
The articles symbolize the failure of Maclean’s and the Toronto Starto uphold their journalistic and corporate social responsibility. The damaging impact of racial stereotyping and antagonism is far-reaching, not just in the realms of media, business, education, workplace, and the society at large, but also to the targeted ethno-cultural individuals and communities.
Maclean’s and the Toronto Star recycled historical and ongoing depictions of Asians as “yellow and brown perils” that threaten the Canadian social order. These media depictions remind us of past anti-Asian government legislation, programs, and public thinking. The Head Tax and Immigration Exclusion laws, the Continuous Journey regulations, and the World War II Internment targeted the Chinese, South Asian, and Japanese Canadian communities, respectively. In 1979 the CTV television news series W5portrayed Canadian citizens and permanent residents of Asian descent as “foreigners,” allegedly taking over Canadian educational institutions. We see Maclean’sand the Toronto Staras reinforcing a long and deeply ingrained history of anti-Asian racial anxiety that has led to bigoted profiling and discrimination of Asian Canadians.
The media’s racial distinction of “us” versus “them” works within a troubling understanding of Canada in which white people or those of European descent are considered the sole rightful citizens and beneficiaries of the nation. Such an understanding makes it difficult to conceive of Canadian universities as educational institutions where Asians as well as Aboriginal peoples and other communities of colour, such as African, Caribbean, Latin American, and Middle Eastern peoples, can also belong. Racialized individuals and communities face challenges to their claims of belonging when certain institutions and entitlements are already deemed as not for them.
The media often portray Asian Canadians in homogeneous ways and fail to account for diversity within the group. They do not distinguish among Asians who are Canadian-born, naturalized citizens, newcomer immigrants, or international students. They neglect to consider the varying educational circumstances of Asian Canadians based on income, class, gender, religion, and language. They lump all Asian Canadians together regardless of their ancestral background, whether they are from China, India, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam, or Sri Lanka. Since Maclean’sand the Toronto Stardepicted Asian Canadians as a homogeneous model minority, they failed to acknowledge the various structural roots of the academic and social struggles that many Asian Canadian students experience. They also missed seeing how community groups are addressing barriers that hinder their goals and pathways for genuine settlement, integration, and well-being in this country.
Although Asian Canadians have been and continue to be discriminated against by racist media portrayals, government policies, and some public opinion, they also have been actively recruited for their labour and capital. Their labour has been crucial to the development of this nation, ranging from the construction of the Canadian Pacific Railway 125 years ago to the recruitment of temporary workers and live-in caregivers of children and the elderly over the last 25 years. Their financial resources have been keenly sought after, as they are considered economic migrants who could bring investment and entrepreneurial capital, and as international students whose high tuition fees augment the inadequate funding of public education. Many Canadian universities aggressively reach out to and recruit students from Asia.
As such, Asian Canadians are trapped in a perpetual racist contradiction: they are both wanted and unwanted in this country. So long as they provide labour, capital, and expertise to the Canadian economy, they are wanted. However, when they assert their entitlement to human rights, genuine integration, and even education in Canada, their sense of belonging is challenged.
Since the media – as well as educational institutions – have perpetrated racial stereotyping, oppression, and antagonism, they need to change their policies and practices in order to help realize the promise of a truly multicultural Canada.
Therefore, we demand that Maclean’s and the Toronto Star:
· must issue a comprehensive and unqualified public apology to Asian Canadians;
· must engage in public consultations to address racial profiling and stereotyping via their media outlets;
· must implement measurable corporate and editorial anti-racism policies in consultation with relevant community constituents, and must publish the results of their policies annually;
· and, must implement employment equity programs to diversify their corporate and editorial boards and frontline personnel.
We also demand that Canadian institutions of higher education:
· must develop academic programs and courses that explicitly address racism in Canada and the historical and contemporary experiences, representations, and contributions of Asian Canadians;
· must undertake and publish campus climate surveys of racialized students, staff, and faculty;
· and, must establish advocacy and support offices for racialized students, staff, and faculty.
We sign this open letter in solidarity with principles and struggles to eliminate anti-Asian racism.
Sincerely,
Canadian coalition of community partners to eliminate anti-Asian racism
National Anti-Racism Council of Canada
Estella Muyinda,
中 加 关 系 发表于 2011-12-5 12:41 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
真能钻牛角尖，连比喻都不懂。还自以为是呢。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 02:21 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
这个Kanana也许很高兴进入维护种族主义媒体多伦多星报的猪流了.
加拿大老张 发表于 2011-12-26 10:31 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
今天他封杀星报，明天他就可以明报，globe mail,后天可能就轮到你
kanada 发表于 2011-12-26 11:09 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
你在偷换概念, 什么时候加拿大的市长能封杀当地的报纸? 福特那是抵制星报. 你还是先回去搞清楚汉语里封杀和抵制的区别吧, 太小儿科了. 顺便说一句, global mail发表过批评福特的文章, 可是福特并没有抵制global mail, 大概福特还没有你那么小鸡肚肠. 你们贵族工会的对福特的市府裁员节支很不满, 我知道.
那些抗议星报种族主义社论"asian students suffering for sucess"又不道歉的亚裔也在抵制星报.抵制种族主义媒体是每个人的权利, 作为亚裔你不想抵制种族主义的星报,是你的选择.
加拿大老张 发表于 2011-12-26 15:07 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
看来你还是没懂。“比喻”是用相似或类似的事物做说明，不存在“配不上”的问题。在这里的相似点是你“舌战”，噢，更正一下，是“网战” （免得你又叫真儿，挑字眼儿）来自四面八方的反对意见。可是，你那么针尖对麦芒的昂扬斗志，实际的立足点是“瞎子摸大象。根本就是片面的，有点“攻其一点（请不要在”一点“这个词上叫真儿）不及其余”。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 15:59 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
“溜须拍马，歌功颂德，盲听盲从的事留给福卫兵们和广大需要被领导的人民群众去做就行了”
------话说得有些胡搅蛮缠了。
“我喜欢干点别人......干不了的事”。
------很自恋。
heleng 发表于 2011-12-26 21:52 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
| 欢迎光临 无忧论坛 (https://bbs.51.ca/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |