This is the fundamental trend of the free market that the material resource created the wealth will eventually go to the hands of the decent entrepreneurs in all kinds of ways no matter on how it will preliminarily be distributed. Those decent entrepreneurs could create their own wealth and accumulate it by controlling and monopolizing the wealth obtained from the other people. This is a fundamentally effective source to create a free market. The resources can be dynamically and freely transferred from the people who inefficiently make use of to those who could highly exploit.
There is an old saying in China that no one could still be rich over three generations. It shows Chinese people’s unwillingness and unpredictability but also discloses the kernel of its free market, namely; the wealth can’t protect itself. Therefore, the next generation of the entrepreneurs who created the wealth could unnecessarily make an efficient use of the resources in their hands . It will be disastrous for the efficient use of the resources of the whole society if those people were living with the social identity system. The free market provides the families with fully enough social system to naturally transfer the resources to the decent entrepreneurs who could efficiently control it. What if those people refuse to hand out their wealth, they would definitely be eliminated by the market, which could force them to hand out their wealth by pushing them to declare bankruptcy. The bottom line is the market will always stubbornly transfer the resource to the entrepreneurs who have the highest capability. It won’t be realized in the society of “ right controls the economy” , social identity system, or state enterprise system. Its overall efficiency of its economy will definitely lower than the one in the society that the resources could be distributed by the market.
Logically speaking, it's unnecessary to be concerned about the enterprises’ future in case people expect the function of the fully distribution of the resources made by the market itself because nobody could change the trend that the wealth and resources would eventually go to the decent entrepreneurs as long as the market is doomed to be free.
To the whole society, it is crucial to design all varieties of social protection systems for those people who have not the capability of those decent entrepreneurs could eventually hand out their wealth. Ultimately, those systems could be created and set up naturally well as long as the decent entrepreneurs could fully exploit their ability and the protection of their property rights could realistically guaranteed.
This is the fundamental trend of the free market that the material resource created the wealth will eventually go to the hands of the decent entrepreneurs in all kinds of ways no matter on how it will preliminarily be distributed. Those decent entrepreneurs could create their own wealth and accumulate it by controlling and monopolizing the wealth obtained from the other people. This is a fundamentally effective source to create a free market. The resources can be dynamically and freely transferred from the people who inefficiently make use of to those who could highly exploit.
There is an old saying in China that no one could still be rich over three generations. It shows Chinese people’s unwillingness and unpredictability but also discloses the kernel of its free market, namely; the wealth can’t protect itself. Therefore, the next generation of the entrepreneurs who created the wealth could unnecessarily make an efficient use of the resources in their hands . It will be disastrous for the efficient use of the resources of the whole society if those people were living with the social identity system. The free market provides the families with fully enough social system to naturally transfer the resources to the decent entrepreneurs who could efficiently control it. What if those people refuse to hand out their wealth, they would definitely be eliminated by the market, which could force them to hand out their wealth by pushing them to declare bankruptcy. The bottom line is the market will always stubbornly transfer the resource to the entrepreneurs who have the highest capability. It won’t be realized in the society of “ right controls the economy” , social identity system, or state enterprise system. Its overall efficiency of its economy will definitely lower than the one in the society that the resources could be distributed by the market.
Logically speaking, it's unnecessary to be concerned about the enterprises’s future in case people expect the function of the fully distribution of the resources made by the market itself because nobody could change the trend that the wealth and resources would eventually go to the decent entrepreneurs as long as the market is doomed to be free.
To the whole society, it is crucial to design all varieties of social protection systems for those people who have not the capability of those decent entrepreneurs could eventually hand out their wealth. Ultimately, those systems could be created and set up naturally well as long as the decent entrepreneurs could fully exploit their ability and the protection of their property rights could realistically guaranteed.