Search reflects there is no car fatality statistics based on brand names.
However, car fatality rates in China rank the second highest in the world, second only to India, based on a survey in 1998, which is dated.
http://www.safecarguide.com/exp/statistics/statistics.htm作者: TorontoRCMP2 时间: 2009-1-10 22:34
相信中国的汽车质量会不断改进，不断提高安全性能。作者: macrophage 时间: 2009-1-10 23:05 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! 谢谢提供资料。
根据你提供的资料，如果把人口总数算进去，中国的交通事故死亡率并不比美洲高（受伤率显然低于美洲），伤亡率都比印度要低多了。作者: 苍蝇拍 时间: 2009-1-10 23:08 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! [U]car fatality rates in China rank the second highest in the world, second only to India, based on a survey in 1998, which is dated.[/U]
How did you get the result above?
You mean 'fatality = fatality rate' ???
In China, the road traffic fatality was 178,894 in 1998;
In India, the road traffic fatality was 216,859 in 1998;
In North America, the road traffic fatality was 49,304.
这些年，我国交通事故死亡绝对人数一直是世界第一。对交通事故进行过专门调研的全国政协委员刘全芳在前不久闭幕的两会上说，更重要的是这些数字背后的对比。有数据表明：中国汽车拥有量是世界的1.9%，死亡人数则是世界的20%。同时,中国交通事故致死率也是世界最高的。2004年我国交通致死率为 27.3%，而同期美国为1.3%，日本为0.9%。作者: 苍蝇拍 时间: 2009-1-10 23:19
In China, the road traffic injury was 5,384,909 in 1998;
In North America, the road traffic injury was 1,670,374.
The crude rate of the road traffic injury in China was 5,384,909 /1.248 billion =0.0043 in 1998.
The crude rate of the road traffic injury in North America was 1,670,374/0.394 billion =0.0042 in 1998.
Is there a big difference in the crude rate of the road traffic injury between China and North America?
No big difference.作者: 山顶洞人 时间: 2009-1-10 23:20 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! Thanks for your information. However, it is statistics in 1998. We are in 2009 now and do you know how much change can be made in past ten years?作者: macrophage 时间: 2009-1-10 23:28 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! 有关材料表明：我国交通死亡人数86年为50063人， 87年为53439人， 88年为54814人， 89年为50441人…… 而去年，我国有107077人死于交通事故（平均每天293人），占世界的五分之一。
the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.作者: macrophage 时间: 2009-1-10 23:46 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.
这个和上面那个一样啊。
某论坛的个人评论，根本没有可信的可供论证的数据来源。
确实，the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.
However, 178,894 is the number of lives lost in the road traffic fatalities, not the number of the road traffic fatalities .作者: 苍蝇拍 时间: 2009-1-10 23:52 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! the road traffic fatality was 178,894. the road traffic fatality =/= 交通事故死亡人数.
In the absence of adequate public funding and an effective administration department under the Chinese government, the development of road traffic injury surveillance and information systems has been too slow to meet present requirements of MVC control and prevention efforts in China. In addition, it has made comparisons difficult when doing MVC research in China (15). For example, at present, much of the developed world defines the mortality of a road traffic collision according to the number of deaths occurring up to 30 days after injury (43). China, however, defines it according to the number of deaths occurring within 7 days after injury, and the number of death wasn’t taken into account for a road traffic collision’s data while the MVC occurred on the railroad in China (20). In addition, there are still eight kinds of road traffic collisions that aren’t incorporated into national statistics in China. For instance, MVCs occurring on private roads constructed by factories, mines and farms’ owners, on cluster paths between houses or buildings, on sections of road still being constructed, and at rail crossings have not been included into traffic collision statistics. Thus, there are frequent discrepancies between data from groups such as police and from health-related sources due to different standards of data collection. As well, underreporting of road traffic injuries also limits the validity of some existing data sources. There is no doubt that this kind of situation can explain why there were different statistical results reported by China and the WHO in 2002.
[U]According to a 2004 WHO report, the number of MVC mortality was 250,007 in 2002 .
The number of MVC deaths reported by the Chinese government was only 107,000 in 2002.[/U]作者: 欲晓 时间: 2009-1-10 23:55
我想在加拿大买中国汽车等了很多年了，希望早日实现我的夙愿。
me too!作者: 283y 时间: 2009-1-10 23:58 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! in the road traffic fatalities, not the road traffic fatality .
it's not 个人评论, it's from yahoo news, the title claims "公安部统计". here is another one from xinhuanet. http://www.qh.xinhuanet.com/traf ... content_9810834.htm
just do a search on yahoo or baidu,it's everywhere.作者: 苍蝇拍 时间: 2009-1-11 00:13 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!!
作者: macrophage 时间: 2009-1-11 00:54 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! just do a search on yahoo or baidu,it's everywhere.
This whole argument is invalid. You can not get real data in China.作者: 单枪匹马 时间: 2009-1-11 11:13
国内交通事故大多是进口车干的，与国产车质量无关 作者: 山顶洞人 时间: 2009-1-11 12:00
国内交通事故大多是进口车干的，与国产车质量无关
The Excel was introduced as a replacement for the Hyundai Pony. In the United States it was the company's first and only model, but thanks to a price of [U]US$4,995 [/U] and being voted 'Best Product #10' by Fortune magazine, it set records for a first-year import by selling 168,882 units, helping push the company's cumulative production past one million by 1986.[2] Similar sales success was replicated in Australia, where it was priced at A$9,990. Sales soon dropped as serious quality problems emerged with the car.
Versions available were:
North America
1.5 base
1.5 GL
1.5 GLS (5-door and 4-door only)
1.5 GS (3-door only)
Australia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyundai_Excel作者: TianSheng 时间: 2009-1-19 10:07 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车比2003年的韩国现代强多了，完全可以打开北美大门！ Thanks for the information. That year is not 2003.作者: 山顶洞人 时间: 2009-1-19 10:19 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车比2003年的韩国现代强多了，完全可以打开北美大门！ Thanks for the information. That year is not 2003.
The Hyundai Excel (Hangul:현대 엑셀), also known as the Hyundai Pony, Hyundai Presto and the Mitsubishi Precis, was the first front wheel drive car produced by Hyundai. It was built from 1985 to 1994.
Background
The Hyundai Excel was available in hatchback and 4-door models. Originally, the Excel was supposed to be replaced by the Elantra in 1991, but ended up being sold for four more seasons until being replaced by the Hyundai Accent in 1995. The Excel was the first Hyundai car to be exported to the United States. From 1989, there was a coupe variant called the Hyundai Scoupe. The Hyundai Excel was available with either a manual or automatic transmission mated to a 4-cylinder engine aspirated by a carburetor or fuel injection system, depending on market and model year.作者: *火眼金睛* 时间: 2009-1-19 15:53 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车的车祸死亡率排名第一,如果打着爱国的旗号贪便宜,撞死活该!!! 1998 年代统计！
但是车的数量很小，也就是说，基数很小，看上去统计数量变大作者: fenye 时间: 2009-1-19 20:59 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车比2003年的韩国现代强多了，完全可以打开北美大门！ Thanks for the information. That year is not 2003.
你个支持达赖的蠢货，你除了以你的小学语文水平断章取义，就是故意歪曲胡说八道，还会些什么？
我说的2003年韩国现代汽车以8千美金保质10年成功打开了美国市场，有错嘛？你凭什么说：“That year is not 2003.”?作者: TianSheng 时间: 2009-1-21 11:40 标题: 回复：回复：回复：中国车比2003年的韩国现代强多了，完全可以打开北美大门！ 你个支持达赖的蠢货，你除了以你的小学语文水平断章取义，就是故意歪曲胡说八道，还会些什么？
我说的2003年韩国现代汽车以8千美金保质10年成功打开了美国市场，有错嘛？你凭什么说：“That year is not 2003.”?
是你自己在不断贬低你自己，怪不得他人，难道不是你先讥笑别人要补小学生课的吗？你自己理屈词穷却还要强词夺理，倒打一耙，岂不是十分可笑？！
如果你的“That year is not 2003”是回别人已经写得明明白白的信息，而不是针对我的，你的回答无异于脱裤子放屁，真是高估了你的语文水平啦！
2003年我就在美国，我的原话出于我亲眼所见的事实。至于我的原话，包括8千美金是什么意思，根本不用解释，因为，是人都能看懂，至于你不懂，你大可问问你身边的任何主人。当然，你不好意思问，也不妨猜猜那是什么意思？猜对了有奖。作者: fenye 时间: 2009-1-22 21:39 标题: 回复：回复：回复：回复：中国车比2003年的韩国现代强多了，完全可以打开北美大门！ 绕那么大的圈子，说那么多废话干什么。既然你亲眼所见，直接回答问题不就行了。2003年，什么型号的韩国现代汽车是以8千美金进入美国市场的？
