既然如此，为什么不修改中国的国籍法呢?作者: 南山月 时间: 2007-2-11 08:31 标题: ５１网友陆海认为：涉及法律根本问题 This is a serious issue.
就目前看到的消息，这是一个全部是涉及法律根本的问题。不管这玉江山或塞利尔是干什么的、他有多么严重地触犯什么法律，现在中加争拗的关键是他是哪国公民。
China has been very consistent. Chinese citizens must apply for immigration status and citizenship of other countries by lawful means including real documents. If their Canadian citizenship is obtained by unlawful means, China has the rights not to recognize the new citizenship. In addition, 玉江山 still has a bench warrant of arrest on him after he escaped from the jail.
This is the legal principle of "clean hand". I am afraid 玉江山 doesn't have too clean his hands.作者: 陆海 时间: 2007-2-11 11:20 最初由[Sedona]发布
China has been very consistent. Chinese citizens must apply for immigration status and citizenship of other countries by lawful means including real documents. If their Canadian citizenship is obtained by unlawful means, China has the rights not to recognize the new citizenship. In addition, 玉江山 still has a bench warrant of arrest on him after he escaped from the jail.
This is the legal principle of "clean hand". I am afraid 玉江山 doesn't have too clean his hands.
Whether Celil got his Canadian citizenship by lawful means or not is not a judgment in the position of Chinese government. NATIONALITY LAW OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA says, “Any Chinese national who has settled abroad and who has been naturalized as a foreign national or has acquired foreign nationality of his own free will shall automatically lose Chinese nationality”, which does not say if a foreign nationality was acquired by lawful or unlawful means. It didn’t or couldn’t mention the term of “lawful” or “unlawful means” because it is not up to Chinese government or Chinese legal system to judge, it is an issue in that foreign country. “Lawful” or “unlawful” can only be determined in the relevant legal system. That means the validity of a Canadian citizenship can only be determined in the Canada law system, not the Chinese government or its legal system; vice versa.
If Cecil illegally got Canadian citizenship, the interested party should challenge it in a Canadian citizenship court. Without a ruling from a Canadian citizenship court, Celil’s Canadian citizenship will remain valid, because it was issued by the authorized body of Canadian Citizenship Act.作者: 51says 时间: 2007-2-11 12:46 标题: 回复：中国政府突然承认“双重国籍”了? 最初由[南山月]发布 中国政府突然承认“双重国籍”了?
这不是自相矛盾么？这跟主犯从犯没有一丁点干系的。作者: 51北山 时间: 2007-2-11 16:17 标题: 俺要沐浴了，C U later。 IT WAS NICE TALKING TO YOU。作者: Arthur001 时间: 2007-2-11 16:17
中国应该注意国际形象，但是这件事情明显没处理好，让北山一解释，更解释成无赖形象了作者: 51says 时间: 2007-2-11 16:20 标题: 回复：俺要沐浴了，C U later。 呵呵，the same to you.
沐浴时可以顺道思考一下更能园得过去的解释 和 何时申请警告 2个问题。
最初由[51北山]发布 俺要沐浴了，C U later。
IT WAS NICE TALKING TO YOU。作者: 51says 时间: 2007-2-11 16:24
呼呼。。。不知不觉中俺成了[无可匹敌]拉，可俺也今天就跟山山掐了一会儿，算是暂时性胜利罢了。。。
China has been very consistent. Chinese citizens must apply for immigration status and citizenship of other countries by lawful means including real documents. If their Canadian citizenship is obtained by unlawful means, China has the rights not to recognize the new citizenship. In addition, 玉江山 still has a bench warrant of arrest on him after he escaped from the jail.
This is the legal principle of "clean hand". I am afraid 玉江山 doesn't have too clean his hands.
I believe those from Fujian have questionable status as well if they obtain their Canadian citizenship by illegal means.
In the reality, no government can enforce every piece of the law, so they have to prioritize and turn a blind eye to some "minor" issues.
Do you know that in Toronto, you cannot park your car on your driveway unless you car is (65 ft, I guess so from my memory) from the sidewalk? How many times have you received a ticket because you park your car on the driveway? The government choose not to enforce this aged old legislation.作者: 第二次握手 时间: 2007-2-11 22:29 最初由[51says]发布
好像前些年许多庇护身份都是以“一胎化”理由得到批准的，当然现在据说其他的更容易批准些。拿美国的来说，他们得到批准，（当然这其中难免有假），后再得到绿卡，继而数年后再得到美国籍。
