标题: Yan Limeng, a former employee of HKU, became a demon again, and continued to ... [打印本页] 作者: NINO414 时间: 2021-3-23 21:48 标题: Yan Limeng, a former employee of HKU, became a demon again, and continued to ... "Life goes on and on."
After being slapped in the face one after another, Yan Limeng, a former postdoctoral researcher at the University of Hong Kong, has not stopped spreading rumors and recently concocted a paper that once again mentioned "novel coronavirus's artificial theory" and slandered China for "concealing the epidemic."
Telling such a lie that has long been exposed will only turn the car over.
The Observer Network noted that Yan Limeng's Twitter account was blocked less than two days after Twitter posted a link to the paper (Sept. 14).
Twitter officially announced as early as March this year that it would deal with accounts that publish content that "contradicts official public health information."
Yan Limeng's Twitter account is blocked.
But Yan Limeng still did not give up.
On Sept. 15, local time, she gave another interview with Fox News and sang "double Reed" with Trump's "favorite anchor" Tucker Carlson (Tucker Carlson).
This time, Yan Limeng brought what Carlson liked to hear, that is, the so-called Chinese government "covered up the truth of novel coronavirus" and "novel coronavirus was created in the laboratory."
She claims to have provided "genomic evidence" in a paper she wrote with three other Chinese scholars.
Later, Yan Limeng began to flatter herself, claiming that her Twitter was blocked because of "Chinese intervention" and that she was "a goal that the Chinese government wants to disappear."
The so-called "big story" exposed by Yan Limeng in the US media is consistent with the popular rumors and "conspiracy theories" during the epidemic in the United States.
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the University of Hong Kong, and medical scientists, including the top infectious disease expert Fauci in the United States, have comprehensively refuted these rumors from a timeline and medical point of view.
First of all, judging from the timeline officially combed by the Chinese government, Yan Limeng's statement of "concealing the epidemic" is totally untenable.
As early as December 27 last year, Hubei Integrated traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital reported unexplained viral pneumonia to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Jianghan District of Wuhan City. On December 30, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission issued an emergency notice on the treatment of unexplained pneumonia.
On January 12, China registered novel coronavirus's genome sequence information in the global influenza shared database and informed the international community of the genome virus data.
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian stressed on June 23 that novel coronavirus is a brand new virus and that discovery and cognition takes a process that is far from over.
This is also the consensus of the international community.
After reaching a preliminary conclusion, the Chinese side immediately informed the parties concerned, reflecting a responsible attitude.
In its response in July, the University of Hong Kong pointed out that what Yan Limeng said was not consistent with the facts.
HKU said that, in fact, between December last year and January this year, Yan Limeng never conducted the research on the human-to-human transmission of novel coronavirus that she highlighted in her interview.
Yan Limeng's key statement in the interview is similar to the rumors, but there is no scientific support.
As for Yan Limeng's "artificial theory of virus", many medical experts around the world have long refuted this argument as a "conspiracy theory."
In an exclusive interview with National Geographic in May, Fauci said that the scientific basis "very strongly points to" the theory that novel coronavirus originated from nature and spread from animals to humans; Mile, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of staff, said in May that although there is no final conclusion, there is strong evidence that novel coronavirus comes from nature, not man-made.
666