唐炜臻 发表于 2016-4-6 20:18:35

说实话我很紧张

很多人都很紧张等待着明天最高法院的决定。


A lot is at stake. If I win I will rewrite a lot of the law on this. Judges are lazy they may want to leave the status quo intact.
Too many interests at stake. But if there is any notion of Justice in Canada, this case is it and Imust win.
The government didn't even have the decency to reply and defend. This is utter contempt of justice for the small fellow.

Occasionally David beats Goliath.


唐炜臻 发表于 2016-4-6 20:20:21

打官司是无硝烟的战争,武器是律师和法律
很多人没有战争的知识,没有常识,一听起来打仗就害怕,怕打,怕受战争的损失。
打官司也一样,人们不知道是打仗,是战争,而不简单是辩论,找法律根据,而是利益的斗争和冲突,是战争。
普通人因为没有法律知识,战争知识,只能依赖律师,任凭律师摆布。
打仗需要人力,士兵和将军,武器和弹药,打官司也一样,需要指挥官,律师和公关,舆论工具。
投资是从市场赚钱,打官司是从法庭赚钱。
个人怕律师,律师怕法官,法官怕大律师行
银行和法官怕老百姓,群众,人民大众。

唐炜臻 发表于 2016-4-6 20:22:14

The Supreme Court has announced that it will bereleasing its decision on Mr. Tang’s leave application tomorrow morning at 9:45 a.m.


The whole world is holding its breadth on the Supreme Court decision. The heartbeat is racing. Many people sleep tonight.
David occasionally beats Goliath.

what will happen tomorrow

A lot is at stake. If you win you will rewrite a lot of the law on this. Judges are lazy they may want to leave the status quo intact. Too many interests at stake. But if there is any notion of Justice in Canada, this case is it and you must win. The government didn't even have the decency to reply and defend. This is utter contempt of justice for the small fellow. Occasionally David beats Goliath.

唐炜臻 发表于 2016-4-7 21:11:57

JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
April 7, 2016
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in the following applications for leave to appeal.

JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
Weizhen Tang v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36754)
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The motion to appoint counsel is dismissed. The motion to adduce fresh evidence is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. /
Expert Opinion

Am shocked. Completely. Nothing to say at all.

I have read the notation of your case. The only reason they dismissed it is because they did not accept the affidavit constituting new evidence. If they had accepted the new evidence regarding Peter Boushy and Legal Aid refusal to fund counsel, you would have won the case. But these courts took the easy way and dismissed application for leave to adduce new evidence.
The only thing is to write a book to expose the injustice. It is to go public.
胳膊扭不过大腿,唐炜臻上诉申请被拒。
一个人正在面对几十个律师和法官,面对政府力量。
不是势均力敌,而是蚂蚁拌大象。没有中间力量。
今天是决定很多人的命运的一天,特别是我,关系到大家的极大利益, 证券会,律师,法官和投资人,大家都在等最高法院的消息。
相当于他们死,输,我活,我赢,关系到法庭的名誉和声誉的问题,权力在他们手里。他们要维护司法的完整性和自己的尊严,面子。
他们目无国法,破坏司法程序搞我。
人们普遍以为他们是公平的,其实不然。
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 说实话我很紧张