这应该是一种入侵吧。
国家太小，相对而言，容易被大国欺负。
Edward 是不是叛徒在美国也有争议，更不要说其他国家。就算是叛徒，有了敢和美国作对的俄罗斯，他也有了一个归宿。中国和俄国的叛徒也一样。否则就象我一直说的，反共的可以去投靠美国；反美的就只有投靠上帝了。
This is your exaggerations. Nobody says 和美国有相同价值观的人是人，不同的就不是人. In fact, there are billions of people who have different values (like yourself) from the US living in the world, and living very well.
Edward Snowden is not a和美国有不同价值观的人, he is a traitor who tells the world all the US national secrets he has ever known while working for the CIA. His information jeopardize US national security, compromise US defense networks against terrorists and put many Americans' lives at risk (including his CIA colleagues).
Tell me how Russia or China would react if a Russian or Chinese does the same thing to them?
weinberger 发表于 2014-3-6 16:16 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
There are a lot of 反共people in China and Russia, but none has done as much damages to their countries than what Snowden has done to the USA by leaking all its national secrets to its enemies.
Edward 是不是叛徒在美国也有争议，更不要说其他国家。就算是叛徒，有了敢和美国作对的俄罗斯，他也有了一个归宿。中国和俄国的叛徒也一样。否则就象我一直说的，反共的可以去投靠美国；反美的就只有投靠上帝了。
SUPERFAN 发表于 2014-3-6 17:20 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
不是间谍的间谍才最危险。美国的教育制度造就了他们这样的人，泄露国家机密就快是美国人的传统了，但坏事有时候也是好事，国家安全局的保密制度会变的更严密。
There are a lot of 反共people in China and Russia, but none has done as much damages to their countries than what Snowden has done to the USA by leaking all its national secrets to its enemies.
weinberger 发表于 2014-3-6 17:35 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
Global research is a ultra left-wing media. The article is an opinion and analysis by Global research, not the facts that are present in the UN report.
weinberger 发表于 2014-3-6 16:06 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif
你争论到最后就开始耍赖了。人家的报道是摘自UN报告的第几页，第几行。说的都是事实吧！尽管极左派专找有利于左派的段落，但那也是事实。是你要看的事实。当别人给了你了，你居然说别人是及左派，不算！至少不是中共，北韩，俄罗斯的报道吧！按你的逻辑，是不是我可以说“Assad use chemical weapon”是及右派的诬蔑呢？
本帖最后由 weinberger 于 2014-3-6 22:25 编辑
Which page, which lines in the UN report said, "it's only the rebel forces that used chemical weapons against the civilians, Assad forces have never used chemical weapons?" These are all Global Research's own interpretation by cutting bits and pieces out of the UN report. Take a look at many other articles there, all filled with half truth, exaggeration and misinterpretations in order to serve their own left wing, anti-US political purposes.
你争论到最后就开始耍赖了。人家的报道是摘自UN报告的第几页，第几行。说的都是事实吧！尽管极左派专找有利于左派的段落，但那也是事实。是你要看的事实。当别人给了你了，你居然说别人是及左派，不算！至少不是中共，北韩，俄罗斯的报道吧！按你的逻辑，是不是我可以说“Assad use chemical weapon”是及右派的诬蔑呢？
aaazzz 发表于 2014-3-6 21:30 http://bbs.51.ca/images/common/back.gif