让巴维权少女出局
转载：让巴维权少女出局
－－顾晓军主义：改变中国·之二千零六十七
把《只有铁腕反腐》发在雅典学园，一叫追真求恒的网友又来跟贴与我绕。其实，我能理解他们－－我被中共意识形态与政法委及所谓的知识精英们合伙封杀，结果是越封杀名气越大；所以，他们总想与我过过招，好向其他人炫耀。
别说是一般的网友如此，就连入门、做了我弟子的石三生、不也在文章中说过、半文盲觉得他的文章、比我写得好吗？
谁的文章更好，在其次；这半文盲论文章好坏，能作数吗？是不是？
《只有铁腕反腐》，是针对《习近平“打老虎”或逼局势突变……》写的，网友红尘是我的一句话、更干脆－－“从古到今没有一个贪污分子和腐败集团敢造反的”，是这个道理吧？
世上的道理，往往被这样或那样的原因扭曲了。比如，“维权”是自由世界向专制国家输出的概念。那么，自由世界是不是应该考虑专制国家的具体情况呢？
应该。但美国精英们没有考虑。他们只知道“保护对少数失去公民权者的侵蚀”（请参考美国《外交政策》之《怎样将民主带到中国》作者：黄亚生），而忘记了在专制体制内大多数人的公民权都被侵蚀了。
因此，在这样的情况下，“保护对少数失去公民权者的侵蚀”没有意义。你美国精英们树的“维权”典型陈光诚，与中共树的好人典型雷锋，有什么两样？甚至，还不如！雷锋做好事，还总有人授益；陈光诚出名、发财，与中国普通老百姓又有什么关系呢？
黄亚生在《怎样将民主带到中国》中已经说了“即使最具批判性的北京知识分子也承认，陈光诚和其他异议分子的想法在中国13亿中只能得到微乎其微的回应”，可自以为是的西方精英们，又打造出了“巴基斯坦维权少女马拉拉”。
这西方精英们打造的马拉拉，与中共打造的张海迪有何区别？张海迪是“身残志坚”，马拉拉是“塔利班枪口下待放的花蕾”－－张海迪高位截瘫却能开车，马拉拉是“待放的花蕾”却已获“国家和平奖”。
都已获“国家和平奖”了，还是什么“待放的花蕾”呢？这不分明是在做戏？其实，在顾粉团向美国《外交政策》推荐“全球百位思想家”、向美国《时代周刊》推荐“年度风云人物”，而《时代周刊》甩掉所有中国人、推出“巴维权少女”时，我已明白：中共意识形态与政法委及所谓的知识精英们，已与西方精英们联系好了－－打造一个弱女子的形象，从而封杀顾晓军、封杀“公正第一”。
证明：CIBN《塔利班枪口下待放的花蕾：巴基斯坦维权少女马拉拉》“国际在线报道：一个花季少女却拥有成为政治家的远大理想”。理想也能说事吗？如果一孩子想当总统咋办呢？
再证：香港中國通訊社的《巴維權少女被提名為諾貝爾和平獎候選人》。诺奖评委会不是明确提名均有50年的保密期的吗？怎么可以这样不守信用、这么造势呢？是不是中西方的精英们，看到顾粉团的《向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军(专题/中英文/更新中)》的气势着急了？想一步到位、既成事实？
可精英们却忘了：顾晓军的“公正是第一价值观”已构成思想体系，而马拉拉只有“成为政治家的远大理想”。你们虽可捧红一少女、把她捧成和平奖的获得者，但是，你们将背上阻碍人类思想发展的骂名。顾粉团会记录下这一切，并告诉这个世界的后人。除非遵守诺言－－让巴维权少女出局。
顾晓军 2013-2-1 南京
http://my.opera.com/guxiaojun/blog/show.dml/58549612
Let Pakistani human rights girl out
- Gu Xiaojun ism: change China's two thousand and sixty-seven
Translator: God has eyes
Hair "iron-fisted anti-corruption" at the Athens
Academy, called chase really seeking constant of
friends came abreast of me around. In fact, I can
understand them - I was the Communist
ideology and the Politics and Law Committee,
and the so-called intellectual elite partner
blocked, the result is more blocked fame the
greater; Therefore, they always want to exchange
blows with me, good to show off to other people.
Not to mention so general users, even the entry-
do my disciples Dan Sansheng, and not also the
article said, semiliterate feel his article, I write
you?
Who better article, followed; This semiliterate
theory article is good or bad, can be operands
do? Is not it?
"Only an iron hand, anti-corruption, Xi Jinping
tigers" or mutation to force the situation ...
"written by friends Red Dust is my sentence,
more simply -" Since ancient times no one dared
to corruption of molecules and corruption Group
rebel "and the truth, right?
The truth of the world, tend to be this or that
reason distorted. For example, the "rights" is the
output of the concept of the free world to the
authoritarian state. The free world should
consider the specific circumstances of the
authoritarian state it?
Should. American elites are not considered. They
only know the "erosion protection of the minority
who lost citizenship" (please refer to United
States foreign policy, "" How to bring democracy
to China ": Yasheng Huang), and forget the
authoritarian regime within most people's
citizenship erosion a.
Accordingly, in such a case, the "protection"
meaningless minority erosion lost citizenship.
Typical American elites tree "rights" Chen
Guangcheng, and the good people of the
Chinese Communist Party tree typical Lei Feng,
What is different? Even not as good! Does good
things, but also the total was granted benefits;
Chen Guangcheng famous, fortune, and the
ordinary people in China what to do with it?
Yasheng Huang, "how to bring democracy to
China" has said "even if the most critical
intellectuals also admitted that the idea Chenof ??
and other dissidents in China's 1.3 billion can
only get a minimal response, self-righteous
Western elites, but also to create a the the
"Pakistan defenders girl malala".
Western elites to build malala, with the Chinese
Communists build Zhang Haidi What's the
difference? Zhang Haidi, "waist", malala "to be
put under the Taliban muzzle bud" - Zhang
Haidi paraplegia was able to drive, malala be
put the bud "has been" the National Peace Prize
.
Have been approved by the State Peace Prize, "to
be put the bud"? This is clearly not in a show?
In fact, in the care of the dough to the United
States' foreign policy "recommend" one hundred
global thinkers ", recommended to the United
States," the Times "Person of the Year", while
the "Times" to get rid of all the Chinese people,
launched Bavi the right girl " , I have to
understand: Ideology and Politics and Law
Committee of Communist China, and the so-
called intellectual elite who have contact with
the Western elites - and to create the image of a
weak woman, which blocked Gu Xiaojun ban "the
public impartiality".
Proof: the CIBN to be put under the Taliban
muzzle bud: Pakistani human rights activists the
girls malala "International Online reports: a
young girl, but has become the lofty ideals of
the politicians". Ideal can say things? If a child
wanted to be president supposed to do?
The card: Hong Kong China News Agency "Bavi
the right girl to be nominated for the Nobel
Peace Prize. Nobel jury is not clear the
nomination have confidentiality period of 50
years.? How can such bad faith, such a
campaign? Is not in the Western elites, see Gu
dough "Gu Xiaojun (thematic / English / update)
" momentum anxious to recommend to the Nobel
Peace Prize? One step, a fait accompli?
Elites forget: Gu Xiaojun of "the public
impartiality is the first values" constitutes a
system of thought, rather malala only "lofty
ideals become politicians. You can, although
helped popularize a girl, her name into the
Peace Prize winner, however, you will bear the
infamy hinder the development of human
thought. Gu dough will record all of this, and
tell the world to future generations. Keep their
promises - Bavi the right girl out.
Gu Xiaojun 2013-2-1 Nanjing
页:
[1]