中国人之所以内斗厉害，是因为领导人不是全民选举出来的

霧雨長風霜塵月

几个国家采用了？
头发乱了 发表于 2010-6-10 13:13

你们应该向更多的国家推广呀

头发乱了

你们应该向更多的国家推广呀
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:14

    您这么优秀都推广不动，咱们还是省省吧。

霧雨長風霜塵月

您这么优秀都推广不动，咱们还是省省吧。
头发乱了 发表于 2010-6-10 13:16

连战眼看就要胜选了，谁料想凭空来两枪，总统成水扁了。
这事在台湾可以说是可笑，要在大陆就要可悲了

头发乱了

连战眼看就要胜选了，谁料想凭空来两枪，总统成水扁了。
这事在台湾可以说是可笑，要在大陆就要可悲了
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:20

    说明有压迫就有抵抗，压迫者必定付出代价，施压者是可悲的。

我在

中国有现成的成功政治制度，各国都可采用嘛
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:13

民主集中制就是两粒集中制，中国古代太监的睾丸都由朝廷集中保管，所以公公们对皇上忠心耿耿，很适合中国的国情。

世界各国有像中国这么多的奴才贱民吗？

霧雨長風霜塵月

说明有压迫就有抵抗，压迫者必定付出代价，施压者是可悲的。
头发乱了 发表于 2010-6-10 13:26

    这说哪去了，咱们还是好好讨论一下怎么向北美传播马列主义吧

头发乱了

这说哪去了，咱们还是好好讨论一下怎么向北美传播马列主义吧
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:29

    你去问毛腊肉吧，他当年干的挺欢。

霧雨長風霜塵月

民主集中制就是两粒集中制，中国古代太监的睾丸都由朝廷集中保管，所以公公们对皇上忠心耿耿，很适合中国的国情。

世界各国有像中国这么多的奴才贱民吗？
小墓勿盗 发表于 2010-6-10 13:28

你对美国的两党轮换制是这么认识滴，简直是深恶痛绝嘛

weinberger

hehe, Chinese style democracy, it's nothing but fake democracy, yes, you can vote, Oh, by the way, you can only vote for this one person who is pre-selected by the party.
Question is, if democracy is so bad like you guys say, why the Chinese government even bother to pretend to have a democracy? why it does not proudly say: "Yes, we are a dictatorship. Democracy is trash"

中国有现成的成功政治制度，各国都可采用嘛
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:13

霧雨長風霜塵月

hehe, Chinese style democracy, it's nothing but fake democracy, yes, you can vote, Oh, by the way, you can only vote for this one person who is pre-selected by the party.
Question is, if democracy is so bad like you guys say, why the Chinese government even bother to pretend to have a democracy? why it does not proudly say: "Yes, we are a dictatorship. Democracy is trash"
weinberger 发表于 2010-6-10 13:34

why bother vote. what a bloody voting show. nobody even interested.

weinberger

yes, two party system is democracy, one-party system is not. As soon as there are two groups of politicians competing against each other, attacking each other in order to win people's votes, people would have the political power, and a leash is put on the politicians to control their behaviour. If China allows two parties to exist, even they're Hu Jing Tao's communist party and Wen Jia Bao's communist party, let them compete for votes, China would be called a democracy, clear?

你对美国的两党轮换制是这么认识滴，简直是深恶痛绝嘛
霧雨長風霜塵月 发表于 2010-6-10 13:32

霧雨長風霜塵月

yes, two party system is democracy, one-party system is not. As soon as there are two groups of politicians competing against each other, attacking each other in order to win people's votes, people would have the political power, and a leash is put on the politicians to control their behaviour. If China allows two parties to exist, even they're Hu Jing Tao's communist party and Wen Jia Bao's communist party, let them compete for votes, China would be called a democracy, clear?
weinberger 发表于 2010-6-10 13:43

越听越糊涂，差点被你绕进去，你是赵本山的徒弟吧

从来没有救世主

噢！原来你只是在说“制度”，而不是统治制度哦！这个简单呀！想想也是，怎么能靠割小鸡鸡来统治哪？
要说一个制度，那个和尚的剃度更是延续上千年了，哦！但愿没有离题！
中国节 发表于 2010-6-10 12:26

说 '和尚的剃度' 你离题了,  中国的宦官制度, 在明代，以所谓“二十四衙门”为基本主体，包括十二监，四局、八局，还陆续设立了东厂，西厂等特务机构, 不是统治制度? 赵国贵族赵高入秦为宦官指鹿为马, 不是统治?

网上好邻居

我的看法是在白人统治的国家，是就是是，非就是非，没有外人指责和干预，而在其他国家，一旦发生争吵，总有外人插手，这是根本原因。中国政府武装干预示崴是镇压，而泰国也干同样的事没人这么说，反对美国政府的人是恐怖主义分子，而反对中国政府的人士民主勇士。

weinberger

反对美国政府的人是恐怖主义分子 -- The US government never say anything like that. There're millions of people who oppose the US government including both foreigners and American themselves. Only those who want to achieve their political goals by attacking, killing unarmed, innocent civilians are called terrorists. Afgan Taliban soldiers are killing US troops there, but the US government never call them terrorists.

我的看法是在白人统治的国家，是就是是，非就是非，没有外人指责和干预，而在其他国家，一旦发生争吵，总有外人插手，这是根本原因。中国政府武装干预示崴是镇压，而泰国也干同样的事没人这么说，反对美国政府的人是恐怖主义分子，而反对中国政府的人士民主勇士。
网上好邻居 发表于 2010-6-10 14:50